Skip to main content
Log in

Area-scale landslide hazard and risk assessment

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Geology

An Erratum to this article was published on 03 August 2006

Abstract

The paper deals with a methodology for quantitative landslide hazard and risk assessments over wide-scale areas. The approach was designed to fulfil the following requirements: (1) rapid investigation of large study areas; (2) use of elementary information, in order to satisfy the first requirement and to ensure validation, repetition and real time updating of the assessments every time new data are available; (3) computation of the landslide frequency of occurrence, in order to compare objectively different hazard conditions and to minimize references to qualitative hazard attributes such as activity states. The idea of multi-temporal analysis set forth by Cardinali et al. (Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 2:57–72, 2002), has been stressed here to compute average recurrence time for individual landslides and to forecast their behaviour within reference time periods. The method is based on the observation of the landslide activity through aerial-photo surveys carried out in several time steps. The output is given by a landslide hazard map showing the mean return period of landslides reactivation. Assessing the hazard in a quantitative way allows for estimating quantitatively the risk as well; thus, the probability of the exposed elements (such as people and real estates) to suffer damages due to the occurrence of landslides can be calculated. The methodology here presented is illustrated with reference to a sample area in Central Italy (Umbria region), for which both the landslide hazard and risk for the human life are analysed and computed. Results show the powerful quantitative approach for assessing the exposure of human activities to the landslide threat for a best choice of the countermeasures needed to mitigate the risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AGS (2000) Landslide risk management concepts and guidelines. Aust Geomech 35:49–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Basilici G (1997) Sedimentary facies in an extensional and deep-lacustrine depositional system: the Pliocene Tiberino Basin, Central Italy. Sediment Geol 109:73–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baynes FJ, Lee M (1998) Geomorphology in landslide risk analysis, an interim report. In: Moore DP, Hungr O (eds) Proceedings of the eighth congress of the International Association of engineering geologists, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 1129–1136

  • Canuti P, Casagli N (1996) Considerazioni sulla valutazione del rischio di frana. Italian National Research Council, Publication CNR/GNDCI N. 846 p 57

  • Cardinali M, Reichenbach P, Guzzetti F, Ardizzone F, Antonimi G, Galli M, Cacciano M, Castellani M, Salvati P (2002) A geomorphological approach to the estimation of landslide hazards and risks in Umbria, Central Italy. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 2:57–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrara A, D’Elia B, Semenza E (1985) Classificazione e nomenclatura dei fenomeni franosi. Geologia Applicata e Idrogeologia 20:223–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrara A, Carton A, Dramis F, Panizza M, Prestininzi A (1987) Cartografia della pericolosità connessa ai fenomeni d’instabilità dei versanti. Bollettino Società Geologica Italiana 106:199–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrara A, Crosta G, Frattini P (2003) Geomorphological and historical data in assessing landslide hazard. Earth Surf Processes Landforms 28:1125–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catenacci V (1992) Il dissesto geologico e geoambientale in Italia dal dopoguerra al 1990. Memorie Descrittive della Carta Geologica d’Italia, Servizio Geologico Nazionale, vol. 47, 301 pp

  • Chowdhury R, Flentje P (2003) Role of slope reliability analysis in landslide risk management. Bull Eng Geol Environ 62:41–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe JA, Michael JA, Crovelli RA, Savage WZ, Laprade WT, Nashem WD (2004) Probabilistic assessment of precipitation-triggered landslides using historical records of landslide occurrence, Seattle, Washington. Environ Eng Geosci 10(2):103–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crovelli RA (2000) Probability models for estimation of number and costs of landslides. USGS OF-Report 00–249

  • Cruden DM (1997) Estimating the risks from landslides using historical data. In: Cruden DM, Fell R (eds) Landslide risk assessment. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 177–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruden DM, Varnes DJ (1996) Landslides types and processes. In: Turner K, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides investigation and mitigation, transportation research board special report NRC, Washington, 247:36–75

  • Del Prete M, Giaccari E, Trisorio-Liuzzi G (1992) Rischio da frane intermittenti a cinematica lenta nelle aree montuose e collinari urbanizzate della Basilicata. Italian National Research Council, Publication CNR/GNDCI N. 841, 84 pp

  • Einstein HH (1988) Landslide risk assessment procedure. In: Proceedings 5th international symposium on landslides, Lausanne, pp. 1075–1090

  • Evans SG (1997) Fatal landslides and landslide risk in Canada. In: Cruden DM, Fell R (eds) Landslide risk assessment. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 185–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Fell R (1994) Landslide risk assessment and acceptable risk. Can Geotechn J 31:261–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fell R, Hartford D (1997) Landslide risk management. In: Cruden DM, Fell R (eds) Landslide risk assessment, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 51–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster MA, Fell R, Spannagle M (1998) Analysis of embankment dam incidents. UNICIV report no. R-374, The University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052. ISBN: 85841 3493

  • Genevois R, Romeo RW (2003) Probability of failure occurrence and recurrence in rock slopes stability analysis. Int J Geomach ASCE 3:34–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F (2000) Landslide fatalities and the evaluation of landslide risk in Italy. Eng Geol 58:89–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hungr O (1997). Some methods of landslide hazard intensity mapping. In: Cruden DM, Fell R (eds) Landslide risk assessment. Balkema, Rotterdam pp 215–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Jibson RW, Harp EL, Michael JA (2000) A method for producing digital probabilistic seismic landslide hazard maps. Eng Geol 58:271–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim SK, Hong WP, Kim YM (1992) Prediction of rainfall-triggered landslides in Korea. In: Landslides, Proceedings of the sixth international symposium on landslides, Christchurch, New Zealand. Balkema, Rotterdam

  • Li KS (1992) A point estimate method for calculating the reliability index of slopes. In: Proceedings of 6th Australia–New Zealand conference on geomechanics, Christchurch, pp 448–451

  • Morgan GC (1997) A regulatory perspective on slope hazards and associated risks to life. In: Cruden DM, Fell R (eds) Landslide risk assessment. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 285–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenstern NR (1997) Toward landslide risk assessment in practice. In: Cruden DM, Fell R (eds) Landslide risk assessment. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 15–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Riddolls & Grocott Ltd. (1999) Quantitative risk assessment methods for determining slope stability risk in the building industry. Branz study report 83, New Zealand, p 38

  • Varnes DJ (1984) Landslide hazard zonation: a review of principles and practice. Natural Hazards, vol 3, Paris, France. UNESCO, 63 pp

  • Wong HN, Ho KS, Chan YC (1997) Assessment of consequence of landslides. In: Cruden DM, Fell R (eds) Landslide risk assessment. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 111–149

    Google Scholar 

  • WP/WLI (1993) A suggested method for describing the activity of a landslide. Bull Int Assoc Eng Geol 47:53–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu TH, Abdel-Latif A (2000) Prediction and mapping of landslide hazard. Can Geotech J 37:781–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was supported by the local government of the Umbria Region, through the grant N. 20/2002. Authors thank Dr. A Boscherini and his staff (Geological Survey of the Umbria Region) for the useful data and the anonymous reviewers for the valuable suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto W. Romeo.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0415-x

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Romeo, R.W., Floris, M. & Veneri, F. Area-scale landslide hazard and risk assessment. Environ Geol 51, 1–13 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0294-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0294-1

Keywords

Navigation