Advertisement

Environmental Geology

, Volume 47, Issue 3, pp 396–404 | Cite as

Environmental impacts of groundwater overdraft: selected case studies in the southwestern United States

  • S. Zektser
  • H. A. LoáicigaEmail author
  • J. T. Wolf

Abstract

The southwestern United States—this paper’s study region—is home to large urban centers and features a thriving agro-industrial economic sector. This region is also one of the driest in North America, with highly variable seasonal and inter-annual precipitation regimes and frequent droughts. The combination of a large demand for usable water and semi-arid climate has led to groundwater overdraft in many important aquifers of the region. Groundwater overdraft develops when long-term groundwater extraction exceeds aquifer recharge, producing declining trends in aquifer storage and hydraulic head. In conjunction with overdraft, declines in surface-water levels and streamflow, reduction or elimination of vegetation, land subsidence, and seawater intrusion are well documented in many aquifers of the southwestern United States. This work reviews case studies of groundwater overdraft in this region, focusing on its causes, consequences, and remedial methods applied to counter it.

Keywords

Groundwater overdraft Aquifer-stream interactions Baseflow Land subsidence 

References

  1. Alley WM, Healy RW, LaBaugh JW, Reilly TE (2002) Flow and storage in groundwater systems. Science 295:1985–1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bertoldi GL, Johnston RH, Evenson KD (1991) Groundwater in the Central Valley, California, a summary report. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1401A. U.S. Geological Survey, Sacramento, California http://water.usgs.gov/pubs/circ/circ1182/pdf/06sanjoaquinvalley.pdf
  3. Brown N, Pezzetti T, Carlson F, Dumas L (1997) San Francisco groundwater master plan technical memorandum TM-18. CH2MHill, San Francisco, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen C, Pei S, Jiao JJ (2002) Land subsidence caused by groundwater exploitation in Suzhou City, China. Hydrogeol J 11:275–287Google Scholar
  5. Davis FW, Stoms DM, Hollander DA, Thomas KA, Stine PA, Odion D, Borchert MI, Thorne, JH, Gray MV, Walker RE, Warner K, Graae J (1998) The California gap analysis project-final report. University of California, Santa Barbara, California http://www.biogeog.ucsb.edu/projects/gap/gap_rep.html
  6. Domenico PA, Schwartz FW (1997) Physical and chemical hydrogeology. 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. DuMars CT, Minier JD (2004) The evolution of groundwater rights and groundwater management in New Mexico and the western United States. Hydrogeol J 12(1):40–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edwards BD, Evans KR (2002) Saltwater intrusion in Los Angeles area coastal aquifers: the marine connection. U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 030–02, San Diego, California http://geopubs.wr.usgs.gov/fact-sheet/sf030–02/index.html
  9. Fleckenstein J, Suzuki E, Fogg G (2001) Local and regional scale investigation of groundwater surface-water interaction in an over-grafted groundwater basin. Hydrologic Sciences Program, University of California, Davis, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  10. Gelt J (1992) Land subsidence, earth fissures, change Arizona’s landscape. Arroyo 6(2):7–15Google Scholar
  11. Getches DH (1990) Water Law, 2nd edn. West, St. Paul, MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  12. Glennon R (2002) A matter of inches for salmon in peril on the Cosumnes. In: Water Follies: Groundwater Pumping and the Fate of America’s Fresh Waters. Island Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Glover RE, Balmer GG (1954) River depletion resulting from pumping near a well. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 35(3):468-470Google Scholar
  14. Jones LL, Larson J (1975) Economic effects of land subsidence due to excessive groundwater withdrawal in the Texas Gulf Coast area. Technical Report No. 67, Texas Water Resources Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, TexasGoogle Scholar
  15. Kernodle JM, McAda DP, Thorn CR (1995) Simulation of groundwater flow in the Albuquerque-Belen Basin, New Mexico. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 86–4194, Reston, VirginiaGoogle Scholar
  16. Lieberman L (2003) Recycled wastewater used to irrigate crops in California. In: The vegetable grower’s news. Great American, Boston, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  17. Loáiciga HA (2003a) Sustainable groundwater exploitation. Int Geol Rev 44(12):1115–1121Google Scholar
  18. Loáiciga HA (2003b) Groundwater mining. In: Stewart BA, Howell, TA (eds) Encyclopedia of Water Sciences, Dekker, New York, pp 345–349Google Scholar
  19. Loáiciga HA (2003c) Climate change and groundwater. Ann Assoc Am Geograph 93(1):30–41Google Scholar
  20. Loáiciga HA, Maidment D, Valdes JB (2000) Climate-change impacts in a regional karst aquifer, Texas, USA. J Hydrol 227:173–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Longley G (1981) The Edwards’ aquifer: Earth’s most diverse groundwater ecosystem. Int J Speleol 11:123–128Google Scholar
  22. Louie C (2001) Salt water: a threat after a century of pumping. San Mateo County Times. March 18, 2, San Mateo, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  23. Nabhan PG, Holdsworth AR (1998) State of the Sonoran desert biome: uniqueness, biodiversity, threats and the adequacy of protection in the Sonoran bioregion. Wildlands Project. University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona http://alic.arid.arizona.edu/sonoran/documents/nabhan/dbgroundwater.html
  24. Reisner M (1987) Cadillac Desert: the American west and its disappearing water. Penguin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Sanderson RE (2000) Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement, Lower Owens River Project, Inyo County, California. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, San Francisco, California http://www.inyowater.org/Annual_Reports/1998-1999/veg.htm
  26. Smith JJ (1994) The effect of drought and pumping on steelhead and coho in Redwood Creek from July to October 1994. Department of Biological Sciences, San Jose State University, San Jose, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  27. Sophocleous M, Koussis A, Martin JL, Perkins SP (1995) Evaluation of simplified stream-aquifer depletion models for water rights administration. Groundwater 33:579–588Google Scholar
  28. Stamon CL, Nishikawa T, Martin P (2001) Water supply in the Mojave River groundwater basin, 1931–99, and the benefits of artificial recharge. U.S. Geological Survey Water fact sheet 122–01, U.S. Geological Survey, San Diego, California http://water.usgs.gov/pubs/FS/fs-122–01
  29. Stienstra T (2001) Lake Merced’s troubled waters: action taken to stop overpumping at Lake. San Francisco Gate, 3–4, San Francisco, California http://www.lakemerced.org/press/stienstra/stienstra013001.html
  30. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1996) San Marcos and Comal Springs and associated ecosystems (revised) recovery plan. Ecological Services Station, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Austin, TexasGoogle Scholar
  31. Zektser IS (2000) Groundwater and the environment: applications for the global community. Lewis, Boca Raton, FloridaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA
  2. 2.Laboratory of Hydrogeology, Water Problems InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesMoscow Russia
  3. 3.Department of Environmental StudiesUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations