Skip to main content
Log in

Quality assessment of armourstone for a rubble mound breakwater (Sinop, Turkey)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Geology

Abstract

Helaldı is a fishing town in the central Black Sea region where construction of a rubble mound breakwater is being planned. The construction of the breakwater requires good quality durable armourstone. Several laboratory tests are performed for the quality assessment of the two potential armourstone, namely, limestone and sandstone. The quality evaluation of the stones is done on the basis of CIRIA/CUR criteria, saturation coefficient, wet-to-dry strength ratio, and the rock durability index. The quality evaluations are then compared with the field performance of both rocks. Laboratory test results, durability assessments and field performance of the rocks indicate that the limestone is a good quality armourstone and it can be used for the breakwater construction. However, the sandstone is marginal to poor material with very poor field performance, and should not be used for the breakwater construction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4 a

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AFNOR (1980) Essai au bleu de methylene. AFNOR 80181, La Defence, Paris, pp 18–592

  • ASTM (1989) Standard test method for resistance to degradation of large-size coarse aggregate by abrasion and impact in the Los Angeles Machine. Code no. C535, American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia, pp 285–287

  • ASTM (1990) Standard test method for soundness of aggregates by the use of sodium sulphate or magnesium sulphate. Code no. C88, American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia pp 37–41

  • ASTM (1992) Standard test method for evaluation of durability of rock for erosion control under wetting and drying conditions. Code no. D5313, American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia, pp 1347–1348

  • Bearman RA (1999) The use of the point load test for the rapid estimation of Mode I fracture toughness. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 36:257–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BSI (1975) Testing aggregates-Methods for determining the physical properties, part 2. Code no. BS 812, British Standards Institution, London

  • BSI (1990a) Method for determination of aggregate crushing value, part 110. Code no. BS 812, British Standards Institution, London

  • BSI (1990b) Testing aggregates: methods for determination of ten percent fines value (TFV), part 111. Code no. BS 812, British Standards Institution, London.

  • BSI (1990c) Testing aggregates-Methods for determination of aggregate impact value, part 112. Code no. BS 812, British Standards Institution, London

  • CIRIA/CUR (1991) Manual on the use of rock in coastal and shoreline engineering. Construction Industry Research and Information Association, London, CIRIA Spec Publ 83/CUR Report 154

  • Clark AR (1988) The use of Portland stone rock armour in coastal protection and sea defence works. Q J Eng Geol 21:113–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark AR, Palmer JS (1991) The problem of quality control and selection of armourstone. Q J Eng Geol 24:119–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Dibb TE, Hughes DW, Poole AB (1983) The identification of critical factors affecting rock durability in marine environments. Q J Eng Geol 16:149–161

    Google Scholar 

  • DIPS 5.0 (1999) DIPS-computer program for graphical and statistical analysis of orientation data. Rocscience, Toronto

  • DLH (1996) Technical documents of the Helaldı Fishing Shelter Project (in Turkish). Ministry of Transportation, Directorate of Ports, Railways and Airports, Ankara

  • Erickson RL (1993) Evaluation of limestone and dolomite armor stone durability from observations in the Great Lakes regions. In: Rock for erosion control. Philadelphia, pp 88–93

  • Fookes PG, Poole AB (1981) Some preliminary considerations on the selection and durability of rock and concrete materials for breakwaters and coastal protection works. Q J Eng Geol 14:97–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Fookes PG, Gourley CS, Ohikere C (1988) Rock weathering in engineering time. Q J Eng Geol 21:201–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosking JR, Tubey W (1969) Research on low-grade and unsound aggregates. Road Research Laboratory Report no. LR 293, Road Research Laboratory, Crowthone

  • ISRM (1981) Rock characterization, testing and monitoring. International Society for Rock Mechanics, Pergamon, Oxford

  • ISRM (1985) Suggested method for point load strength. Int J Rock Mech 22:51–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latham JP (1991) Degradation model for rock armour in coastal engineering. Q J Eng Geol 24:101–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham JP (1998) Assessment and specification of armourstone quality from CIRIA/CUR (1991) to CEN (2000): advances in aggregates and armourstone evaluation. The Geological Society, London, Engineering Geology Spec Publ no. 13, pp 65–85

  • Latham JP, Poole AB, Laan GJ, Verhoef PNF (1990) Geological constraints on the use of quarried rock in coastal structures. In: Proc of the 6th Int Congr IAEG, August 1990, Amsterdam, Balkema, Rotterdam pp 217–225

  • Lienhart DA (1994) Durability issues in the production of rock for erosion control. In: Proceedings of the 1st North American rock mechanics symposium on rock mechanics, models, and measurements, challenges from industry. June 1994, Austin, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 1083–1090

  • Lienhart DA, Stransky TE (1981) Evaluation of the potential sources of rip-rap and armourstone-methods and considerations. Bull Assoc Eng Geol 18:323–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutton RJ, Erickson RL (1992) Problems with armor-stone quality on Lakes Michigan, Huron, and Erie. In: Durability of stone for rubble mound breakwaters. American Society for Civil Engineers, New York, pp 115–136

  • Magoon OT, Baird WF (1992) Durability of armor stone for rubble mound structures. In: Durability of stone for rubble mound breakwaters. American Society for Civil Engineers, New York, pp 3–4

  • Mather RP (1985) Rock for breakwater construction in western Australia: its availability and influence on design. Eng Geol 22:35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole AB (1991) Rock quality in coastal engineering. Q J Eng Geol 24:85–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Priest SD (1993) Discontinuity analysis for rock engineering. Chapman and Hall, London

  • Schaffer RJ (1972) The weathering of natural building stones. Special Report no. 18, Department of Scientific and Industrial Researches, London

  • Smith MR (1999) Stone: building stone, rock fill and armourstone in construction. The Geological Society, London, Engineering Geology Spec Publ no. 16

  • Stank KR, Knox JW (1992) Service records of Chicago district breakwater stone and how these relate to test results. In: Durability of stone for rubble mound breakwaters. American Society for Civil Engineers, New York, pp 95–114

  • Topal T, Acir O (2002) Quality assessment of the armourstone for the Helaldı (Sinop) rockfill breakwater. METU Research Fund Project no 2001-03-09-05, METU, Ankara

  • TS 699 (1987) Methods of testing for natural building stones (in Turkish). Turkish Standards Institute, Ankara

  • Winkler EM (1986) A durability index for stone. Bull Assoc of Eng Geol 30:99–101

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by METU Research Fund Project no. 2001-03-09-05. The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. J.P. Latham for his valuable suggestions on the laboratory testing of the armourstone.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Topal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Topal, T., Acir, O. Quality assessment of armourstone for a rubble mound breakwater (Sinop, Turkey). Env Geol 46, 905–913 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-004-1102-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-004-1102-4

Keywords

Navigation