Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Hydrogeochemical evaluation of Western Anatolian mineral waters

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Geology

Abstract

Turkey lies on the Alpine-Himalayan belt which is one of the most important geothermal belts in the World. Therefore, there are numerous mineral waters in Anatolia where geological and tectonic activities are intense. Archeological studies conducted in Anatolia, which is the cradle of various civilizations, reveal the fact that mineral water has been used as a spa in many areas.

The scope of this study is to evaluate mineral waters in Western Anatolia and their use in thermal resorts for balneological purposes. In this respect, 50 thermal waters used in spa centers were analyzed for various physical, chemical and bacteriological parameters.

Among the 50 waters tested, 40 are thermomineral waters while 10 are acratothermal waters. Some of these waters have distinct chemical compositions. Their temperatures are between 21 and 90 °C. Various types of mineral water source occur within this region: 5 of these are sulfurous, 1 has carbon dioxide, 29 have fluorine, 1 has iodine and 3 are saliferous. The thermomineral sources with saline characteristics have balneotherapy potential for treating skin illnesses including psoriasis and rheumatological illnesses.

Some waters with appreciable bicarbonate and sulfate concentrations can also be used for balneotherapy; for example for use as a cure for chronic inflammatory diseases of gastrointestinal and urinary systems. They could also be used as a cure for prophylactic and metaphylactic treatment of urolithiasis.

However, among 38 sampling sites, 12 sites are bacteriologically contaminated. This indicates that regulations governing the protection of such zones are not properly enforced and that water sources within these regions are not sufficiently protected or inspected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akat U and others (1975) Menderes Masifi Güneyi GB Toros Kusagı Iliskisi,(on rapor). MTA Raporu No.5488, Ankara, 58 pp

  • APHA, AWWA, WEF (American Public Health Association, Water Environment Federation) (1989) Standard methods for the determination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, 1391pp

  • Barnes S and others (1978) Global distribution of carbon dioxide discharges and major zones of Seismicity. U.S. Geological Survey Resources Investigations, Open-File Report, vol 132, pp 72–79

  • Barut IF (2001) Milas (Mugla)-Ekinambarı ve Savran Tuzlu Kaynaklarının Hidrokimyasal Arastırması. PhD Thesis, I.U. Fen Bilimleri Enstitusu, Istanbul, 189 pp

  • Dogal Kaynak (1997) MADEN VE IÇME SULARI İLE TIBBI SULARIN ISTIHSALI, AMBALAJLANMASI VE SATIŞI HAKKINDA YONETMELIK. Resmi Gazete 18.10.1997, Sayı 23144

  • Duchi V and others (1991) Chemical relationship between discharging fluids in the Siena-Radicofani Graben and the deep fluids produced by the geothermal fields of Mt. Amiata, Torre Alfina and Latera (Central Italy). J Volcanol Geotherm Res 31:401–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Ercan T (1979) Batı Anadolu, Trakya ve Ege adalarındaki Senozoyik volkanizması. Jeoloji Muh Dergisi, Sayı:9

  • Fyfe WS, Price FJ, Thompson AB (1978) Fluids in the Earth’s crust. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 382 pp

  • Graciansky, PC (1965) Menderes Masifi Guney Kıyısı Boyunca Gorulen Metamorfizma Hakkında Acıklamalar. MTA Dergisi, 64 pp

  • Graciansky PC (1972) Recherches Geologiques Dans Le Taurus Lycien. Fac Sci Universite Paris-Sud (Orsay), vol 896, 762 pp

  • Hem JD (1965) Study and interpretation of the chemical characteristics of natural Water, 2nd edn. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1473, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 269 pp

  • Piper AM (1953) A graphic procedure in the geochemical interpretation of water analyses. US Geol Survey, Groundwater Note 12

  • Sahinci A (1991) Yeraltısuları Jeokimyası. D.E.Üni Muh Mim Fak Yayını, 394 pp

  • Turkiye Jeotermal Envanteri (1996) Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Mudurlugu. Ankara

  • Türkman M (1972) Su Kimyası Calısmaları Rehberi. DSİ Matbaası, Ankara

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been supported by the Istanbul University Research Fund (Project No: 874/090896). The authors would like to thank to Dr.Bio. H.Demirtas for conducting the biological analyses. We also extend our warmest thanks to Prof.Dr. Namık Yalçın.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Istanbul University, Institute of Marine Sciences and Management, Müşkile sok., Vefa, 34470, Istanbul, Turkey

    I. F. Barut

  2. Medical Faculty, Medical Ecology and Hydroclimatology Department, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey

    N. Erdogan & E. Basak

Authors
  1. I. F. Barut
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N. Erdogan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. E. Basak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. F. Barut.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barut, I.F., Erdogan, N. & Basak, E. Hydrogeochemical evaluation of Western Anatolian mineral waters. Env Geol 45, 494–503 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-003-0904-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-003-0904-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation