Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Application of ground penetrating radar in mapping and monitoring landfill sites

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Geology

Abstract

The internal structure and the integrity of the containment walls are aspects of landfill site management that need to be continuously monitored. Monitoring currently involves construction of boreholes and chemical analyses of surface samples which are time-consuming and expensive. The applicability of ground penetrating radar (GPR) as an aid to monitoring these processes has been investigated. GPR surveys have successfully resolved the shallow depth soil and geological structure, identified the structure and history of the waste input, defined the water table in three dimensions and identified leachout breakout points in the impermeable lining of the landfill edges. Integration of the results of GPR surveys with data from surface surveys and boreholes could provide landfill operators, environmental agencies and commercial companies with a cost-effective monitoring methodology and a mechanism for enhancing contaminant migration modelling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbaspour K, Matta V, Huggenberger P, Johnson CA (2000) A contaminated site investigation: a comparison of information gained from geophysical measurements and hydrogeological modeling. J Contaminant Hydrol 40:365–380

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ali JW, Hill IA (1991) Reflection seismics for shallow geological investigations—a case study from central England. J Geol Soc Lond 148:219–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Annan AP (1993) Practical processing of GPR data. In: Proc 2nd Government Worksh on Ground Penetrating Radar, Columbus, Ohio

  • Annan AP, Cosway SW (1992) Ground penetrating radar survey design. In: Proc Symp on The Application of Geophysics to Environmental and Engineering Problems (SAGEEP '92), pp 191–208

  • Asante-Duah DK (1996) Managing contaminated sites. Wiley-Interscience, Chichester, UK

  • Brun A, Engesgaard P (2002) Modelling of transport and biogeochemical processes in pollution plumes: literature review and model development J Hydrol 256:211–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Butt TE, Oduyemi KOK (2003) A holistic approach to concentration assessment of hazards in the risk assessment of landfill leachate. Environ Int 28:597–608

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davis JL, Annan AP (1989) Ground penetrating radar for high resolution mapping of soil and rock stratigraphy. Geophys Prospect 37:531–551

    Google Scholar 

  • De Iaco R, Green AG, Maurer HR, Horstmeyer H (2003) A combined seismic reflection and refraction study of a landfill and its host sediments. J Appl Physics 1408:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Fatta D, Naoum D, Loizidou M (2002) Integrated environmental monitoring and simulation system for use as a management decision support tool in urban areas. J Environ Manage 64:333–343

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forde MC (1996) Accuracy of GPR on contaminated land. In: Proc 4th Int Conf on Polluted and Marginal Land, London, pp 443–450

  • Knight R (2001) Ground penetrating radar for environmental applications. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 29:229–255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liner CL, Liner JL (1995) Ground penetrating radar: a near-surface experience from Washington County, Arkansas. Leading Edge 14:17–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu G, Yonggang J, Liu H, Qiu H, Qiu D, Shan H (2002) Environ Sci Technol 36:1077–1085

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meju MA (2000) Geoelectrical investigation of old/abandoned, covered landfill sites in urban areas: model development with a genetic diagnosis approach. J Appl Geophys 44:115–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobes DC (1996) Troubled waters: environmental applications of electrical and electromagnetic methods. Surv Geophys 17:393–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Padaraze I, Forde MC (1994) Limits of effectiveness of digital impulse radar in contaminated land site investigation. In: Proc 3rd Int Conf on Polluted and Marginal Land, pp 397–401

  • Peters L, Daniels JJ, Young JD (1994) Ground-penetrating radar as a subsurface environmental sensing tool. In: Proc IEEE '82, pp 1802–1822

  • Reynolds JM, Taylor DI (1992) The use of sub-surface imaging techniques in the investigation of contaminated sites. In: Proc 2nd Int Conf on polluted and marginal land, London, pp 121–131

  • Trenholme NM, Bentley LR (1998) The use of ground penetrating radar to accurately determine water table depths. In: Bell R, Powers M, Larson T (eds) Proc Symp on The Application of Geophysics to Environmental and Engineering Problems (SAGEEP '98), Environmental and Engineering Geophysics Society, Chicago, pp 829–838

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by equipment loans from the NERC Geophysical Equipment Pool. Miss Splajt's studentship was funded by Landfill Tax Credits through Enventure Northern.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, University of Hull, HU6 7RX, Hull, Humberside, England

    T. Splajt, G. Ferrier & L. E. Frostick

Authors
  1. T. Splajt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. Ferrier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. L. E. Frostick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Ferrier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Splajt, T., Ferrier, G. & Frostick, L.E. Application of ground penetrating radar in mapping and monitoring landfill sites. Env Geol 44, 963–967 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-003-0839-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-003-0839-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation