Abstract
In this study, three kinds of wines separately made from mulberry (MW), grape (GW), or mulberry/grape (MGW) were developed and their enological parameters, sensory scores, volatile components, and microbiota were investigated and compared. Contrary to the order of residual sugar and acidity of the three kinds of wines, the order of alcohol content from high to low is GW, MW, and MGW. A total of 60 volatile components (VCs), including esters (17), alcohols (12), acids (6), aldehydes (7), ketones (3), alkenes (3), amines (3), alkanes (4), pyrazines (2), benzene (1), sulfide (1), and thiazole (1), were identified by gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometer (GC-IMS). The fingerprint of VCs and principal component analysis revealed that the volatile profiles of MGW and GW were more similar in comparison to that of MW and were significantly correlated with the mass ratio of mulberry to grape. Lactobacillus, Weissella, Pantoea, Leuconostoc, Lactococcus, Paenibacillus, Pediococcus, and Saccharomyces were identified as the main microflora at the genus level shared by the MW, MGW, and GW, suggesting that the heterolactic bacteria may contribute more to the high content of volatile acids in MW and MGW. The heatmap of core microbiota and main VCs of MW, MGW, and GW suggested the complicated and significant correlation between them. The above data implied that the volatile profiles were more closely related to the raw materials of winemaking and markedly affected by the fermentation microorganisms. This study provides references for evaluation and characterization of MGW and MW and improvement of MGW and MW winemaking process.
Key points
• Fruit wine enological parameters, volatile profile, and microbiota were compared.
• Sixty volatile compounds were identified by GC-IMS in three types of fruit wines.
• Winemaking materials and microbiota affect volatile profiles of the fruit wines.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data will be made available on reasonable request.
References
Amerine MA, Roessiler EB, Filipello F (1959) Modern sensory methods of evaluating wine. Hilgardia 28(18):489–539. https://doi.org/10.3733/hilg.v28n18p477
Bagheri B, Bauer FF, Setati ME (2017) The impact of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on a wine yeast consortium in natural and inoculated fermentations. Front Microbiol 8:1988. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01988
Baumes R (2009) Wine aroma precursors. In: Moreno-Arribas MV, Polo MC (eds) Wine chemistry and biochemistry, 1st edn. Springer, New York, NY, pp 251–274
Böhmer M, Smoľak D, Ženišová K, Čaplová Z, Pangallo D, Puškárová A, Bučková M, Cabicarová T, Budiš J, Šoltýs K, Rusňáková D, Kuchta T, Szemes T (2020) Comparison of microbial diversity during two different wine fermentation processes. FEMS Microbiol Lett 367(18):fnaa150. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnaa150
Bokulich NA, Thorngate JH, Richardson PM, Mills DA (2014) Microbial biogeography of wine grapes is conditioned by cultivar, vintage, and climate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111(1):E139–E148. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317377110
Bokulich NA, Collins TS, Masarweh C, Allen G, Heymann H, Ebeler SE, Mills DA (2016) Associations among wine grape microbiome, metabolome, and fermentation behavior suggest microbial contribution to regional wine characteristics. Mbio 7(3):e00631-e716. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00631-16
Chen L, Ren L, Li D, Ma X (2021) Analysis of microbiomes in three traditional starters and volatile components of the Chinese rice wines. Food Sci Biotechnol 30(1):87–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-020-00839-y
Costantini A, Cravero MC, Panero L, Bonello F, Vaudano E, Pulcini L, Garcia-Moruno E (2021) Wine fermentation performance of indigenous Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces paradoxus strains isolated in a Piedmont vineyard. Beverages 7(2):30. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages7020030
De-la-Fuente-Blanco A, Sáenz-Navajas MP, Ferreira V (2016) On the effects of higher alcohols on red wine aroma. Food Chem 210:107–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.04.021
Devi A, Anu-Appaiah KA, Waterhouse AL (2020) Adsorption and biotransformation of anthocyanin glucosides and quercetin glycosides by Oenococcusoeni and Lactobacillus plantarum in model wine solution. J Sci Food Agr 100(5):2110–2120. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.10234
Dillon VM (2014) Natural anti-microbial systems (a) preservative effects during storage. In: Dillon VM (ed) Encyclopedia of food microbiology, 2nd edn. Elsevier Ltd, UK, pp 941–947
Feng Y, Liu M, Ouyang Y, Zhao X, Ju Y, Fang Y (2015) Comparative study of aromatic compounds in fruit wines from raspberry, strawberry, and mulberry in central Shaanxi area. Food Nutr Res 59:29290. https://doi.org/10.3402/fnr.v59.29290
Ferrando N, Araque I, Ortís A, Thornes G, Bautista-Gallego J, Bordons A, Reguant C (2020) Evaluating the effect of using non-Saccharomyces on Oenococcusoeni and wine malolactic fermentation. Food Res Int 138(Pt B):109779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109779
Fleet GH (2003) Yeast interactions and wine flavour. Int J Food Microbiol 86(1–2):11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-1605(03)00245-9
Guzzon R, Malacarne M, Larcher R, Franciosi E, Toffanin A (2020) The impact of grape processing and carbonic maceration on the microbiota of early stages of winemaking. J Appl Microbiol 128(1):209–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14462
Han DM, Chun BH, Kim HM, Jeon CO (2021) Characterization and correlation of microbial communities and metabolite and volatile compounds in doenjang fermentation. Food Res Int 148:110645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110645
Huang HP, Ou TT, Wang CJ (2013) Mulberry (sang shèn zǐ) and its bioactive compounds, the chemoprevention effects and molecular mechanisms in vitro and in vivo. J Tradit Compl Med 3(1):7–15. https://doi.org/10.4103/2225-4110.106535
Iorizzo M, Testa B, Lombardi SJ, García-Ruiz A, Muñoz-González C, Bartolomé B, Moreno-Arribas MV (2016) Selection and technological potential of Lactobacillus plantarum bacteria suitable for wine malolactic fermentation and grape aroma release. LWT-Food Sci Technol 73:557–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2016.06.062
Jan B, Parveen R, Zahiruddin S, Khan MU, Mohapatra S, Ahmad S (2021) Nutritional constituents of mulberry and their potential applications in food and pharmaceuticals: a review. Saudi J Bio Sci 28(7):3909–3921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.03.056
Jeromel A, Korenika AJ, Ivana A (2019) An influence of different yeast species on wine aroma composition. Fermented Beverages 5:171–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815271-3.00006-3
Jiang Y, Nie WJ (2015) Chemical properties in fruits of mulberry species from the Xinjiang province of China. Food Chem 174:460–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.11.083
Krieger-Weber S, Heras JM, Suarez C (2020) Lactobacillus plantarum, a new biological tool to control malolactic fermentation: a review and an outlook. Beverages 6(2):23. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages6020023
Lasik-Kurdyś M, Majcher M, Nowak J (2018) Effects of different techniques of malolactic fermentation induction on diacetyl metabolism and biosynthesis of selected aromatic esters in cool-climate grape wines. Molecules 23(10):2549. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23102549
Liu SQ, Pilone GJ (2000) An overview of formation and roles of acetaldehyde in winemaking with emphasis on microbiological implications. Int J Food Sci Tech 35(1):49–61. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2621.2000.00341.x
Liu S, Wu C, Fan G, Li T, Ying R, Miao Y (2017) Effects of yeast strain on anthocyanin, color, and antioxidant activity of mulberry wines. J Food Biochem 41(6):e12409. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfbc.12409
Lu Y, Guan X, Li R, Wang J, Liu Y, Ma Y, Lv J, Wang S, Mu J (2021) Comparative study of microbial communities and volatile profiles during the inoculated and spontaneous fermentation of persimmon wine. Process Biochem 100:49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2020.09.023
Mendoza LM, Fernández de Ullivarri M, Raya R (2018) Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a key yeast for the wine-making process. In: Perez JD (ed) A closer look at grapes, wines and winemaking. Nova Science, New York, pp 173–202
Mi S, Zhang X, Wang Y, Zheng M, Zhao J, Gong H, Wang X (2022) Effect of different genotypes on the fruit volatile profiles, flavonoid composition and antioxidant activities of chilli peppers. Food Chem 374:131751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131751
Molina AM, Swiegers JH, Varela C, Pretorius IS, Agosin E (2007) Influence of wine fermentation temperature on the synthesis of yeast-derived volatile aroma compounds. Appl Microbiol Biot 77(3):675–687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-007-1194-3
Nan L, Liu L, Li Y, Huang J, Wang Y, Wang C, Wang Z, Xu C (2021) Comparison of aroma compounds in Cabernet Sauvignon red wines from five growing regions in Xinjiang in China. J Food Quality 2021:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5562518
Nisiotou A, Dourou D, Filippousi ME, Banilas G, Tassou C (2014) Weissellauvarum sp. nov., isolated from wine grapes. Int J Syst Evol Micr 64(Pt 11):3885–3890. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.066209-0
Perestrelo R, Silva C, Câmara JS (2019) Madeira wine volatile profile. A platform to establish Madeira wine aroma descriptors. Molecules 24(17):3028. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24173028
Pozo-Bayón MÁ, Andújar-Ortiz I, Moreno-Arribas MV (2009) Volatile profile and potential of inactive dry yeast-based winemaking additives to modify the volatile composition of wines. J Sci Food Agr 89(10):1665–1673. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.3638
Rigou P, Mekoue J, Sieczkowski N, Doco T, Vernhet A (2021) Impact of industrial yeast derivative products on the modification of wine aroma compounds and sensorial profile A review. Food Chem 358:129760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129760
Robles A, Fabjanowicz M, Chmiel T, Potka-Wasylka J (2019) Determination and identification of organic acids in wine samples Problems and challenges. TRAC-Trend Anal Chem 120(11):115630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2019.115630
Rousseaux S, Diguta CF, Radoï-Matei F, Alexandre H, Guilloux-Bénatier M (2014) Non-Botrytis grape-rotting fungi responsible for earthy and moldy off-flavors and mycotoxins. Front Microbiol 38:104–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2013.08.013
Shi X, Liu Y, Ma Q, Wang J, Luo J, Suo R, Sun J (2022) Effects of low temperature on the dynamics of volatile compounds and their correlation with the microbial succession during the fermentation of Longyan wine. LWT-Food Sci Technol 154:112661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112661
Sumby K, Grbin P, Jiranek V (2010) Microbial modulation of aromatic esters in wine: current knowledge and future prospects. Food Chem 121(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.12.004
Takase H, Sasaki K, Kiyomichi D, Kobayashi H, Matsuo H, Takata R (2018) Impact of Lactobacillus plantarum on thiol precursor biotransformation leading to production of 3-sulfanylhexan-1-ol. Food Chem 259:99–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.03.116
Tata A, Massaro A, Damiani T, Piro R, Dall’Asta C, Suman M (2022) Detection of soft-refined oils in extra virgin olive oil using data fusion approaches for LC-MS, GC-IMS and FGC-Enose techniques: The winning synergy of GC-IMS and FGC-Enose. Food Control (Pt.B):108645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108645
UC Davis scoring system (2011) Wine Encyclopedia. https://www.wines.com/encyclopedia/uc-davis-scoring-system/. Accessed 18 Feb 2011
Varela C, Siebert T, Cozzolino D, Rose L, Mclean H, Henschke PA (2009) Discovering a chemical basis for differentiating wines made by fermentation with ‘wild’ indigenous and inoculated yeasts: role of yeast volatile compounds. Aust J Grape Wine R 15(3):238–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.2009.00054.x
Virdis C, Sumby K, Bartowsky E, Jiranek V (2020) Lactic acid bacteria in wine: technological advances and evaluation of their functional role. Front Microbiol 11:612118. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.612118
Wagner N, Tran QH, Richter H, Selzer PM, Unden G (2005) Pyruvate fermentation by Oenococcusoeni and Leuconostocmesenteroides and role of pyruvate dehydrogenase in anaerobic fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol 71(9):4966–4971. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.9.4966-4971.2005
Wang L, Sun X, Li F, Yu D, Liu X, Huang W, Zhan J (2015) Dynamic changes in phenolic compounds, colour and antioxidant activity of mulberry wine during alcoholic fermentation. J Funct Foods 18:254–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2015.07.013
Wang HL, Hopfer H, Cockburn DW, Wee J (2020) Characterization of microbial dynamics and volatile metabolome changes during fermentation of Chambourcin hybrid grapes from two Pennsylvania regions. Front Microbiol 11:614278. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.614278
Wang J, Lu C, Xu Q, Li Z, Song Y, Zhou S, Zhang T, Luo X (2022) Bacterial diversity and lactic acid bacteria with high alcohol tolerance in the fermented grains of soy sauce aroma type Baijiu in north China. Foods 11(12):1794. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11121794
Waterhouse AL, Sacks GL, Jeffery DW (2016) Aldehydes, ketones, and related compounds. In: Waterhouse AL, Sacks GL, Jeffery DW (eds) Understanding wine chemistry, 1st edn. Wiley, US, pp 79–87
Wei R, Ding Y, Gao F, Zhang L, Wang L, Li H, Wang H (2022) Community succession of the grape epidermis microbes of Cabernet Sauvignon (Vitisvinifera L.) from different regions in China during fruit development. Int J Food Microbiol 362:109475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2021.109475
Yang L, Gao H, Meng L, Fu X, Du X, Wu D, Huang L (2021) Nondestructive measurement of pectin polysaccharides using hyperspectral imaging in mulberry fruit. Food Chem 334:127614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127614
Zhang H, Ma ZF, Luo X, Li X (2018) Effects of mulberry fruit (Morus alba L.) consumption on health outcomes: a mini-review. Antioxidants-Basel 7(5):69. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox7050069
Zhang S, Chen X, Zhong Q, Zhuang X, Bai Z (2019) Microbial community analyses associated with nine varieties of wine grape carposphere based on high-throughput sequencing. Microorganisms 7(12):668. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7120668
Zhang J, Plowman JE, Tian B, Clerens S, On SLW (2021) Application of MALDI-TOF analysis to reveal diversity and dynamics of winemaking yeast species in wild-fermented, organically produced, New Zealand Pinot Noir wine. Food Microbiol 99:103824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2021.103824
Zhang Z, Zhang Q, Yang H, Sun L, Xia H, Sun W, Wang Z, Zhang J (2022) Bacterial communities related to aroma formation during spontaneous fermentation of ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ wine in Ningxia. China Foods 11(18):2775. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11182775
Funding
This study was supported by the Food Processing Discipline Group of Hebei Agricultural University (No. 2021–06), the earmarked fund for Hebei Fruit Innovation Team of Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System (HBCT2018100204), and Key Research and Development Program of Hebei Province, China (19227141D).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JT and GD conceived and designed research. MJ, JG, YL, YT, and CA conducted GC-IMS and microbial community analysis. MJ and JT wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ji, M., Gong, J., Tian, Y. et al. Comparison of microbial communities and volatile profiles of wines made from mulberry and grape. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 107, 5079–5094 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-023-12632-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-023-12632-y