Skip to main content
Log in

Relative humidity impacts development and activity against Aedes aegypti adults by granular formulations of Metarhizium humberi microsclerotia

  • Biotechnological products and process engineering
  • Published:
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The impact of ambient relative humidity (RH) on conidial production of Metarhizium humberi IP 46 microsclerotia (MS) formulated in pellets or granules was investigated, and a promising granular formulation was tested against Aedes aegypti adults to confirm its efficacy. Microcrystalline cellulose (MC) and diatomaceous earth (DE) or a combination of vermiculite (VE), DE and silicon dioxide (SD) were tested as carriers in granular formulations containing MS. A range of 93–96.5% RH was critical for fungal development, and at least 96.5–98.5% RH was required for high conidial production on pellets or granules. Conidial production was clearly higher on pellets and granules prepared with VE than MC as the main carrier. VE granules containing MS were highly active against A. aegypti adults. Most mosquitoes were killed within 6 days after treatment regardless of the exposure time of adults to the formulation (1 min–24 h) or ambient humidity (75 or >98%). Production of conidia on dead adults varied between 7.3 × 106 and 2.2 × 107 conidia/individual, when exposed to MS granules for 12 h and 1 min, respectively. Granular formulations containing VE as the main carrier and MS as the active ingredient of M. humberi have strong potential for use against A. aegypti.

Key points

• High conidial production on granular microsclerotial formulations at >96.5% RH

• Vermiculite is more appropriate as a carrier than microcrystalline cellulose

• Granules with IP 46 microsclerotia are highly active against Aedes aegypti adults

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data available on request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Elen Regozino Muniz and Prof. Walquíria Arruda (ICB, UFG) for technical assistance, and Prof. Eliana M. Lima, coordinator of FARMATEC-UFG for providing facilities.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, CNPq, Universal (14/2012 48329/2012-0), Coordination of the Improvement of Higher Education, CAPES/MEC, CNPq/MCTI and Brazilian Ministry of Health, Decit/SCTIE/MS (440506/2016) and scholarships to JR, AC and FP (CNPq) and to AS, JM and TS (CAPES). We also thank CNPq for the grants PQ 308850/2015-7 to ÉF and PQ 303096/2019-5 to CL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CL, RM, GM, ÉF and RH conceived the research. JR, AC, FP, TS, JM, RM, GM, ÉF and CL designed the experiments. JR, AC and AS performed the experiments. JR, AC and JM assisted in the insect rearing and analysed the data. JR, AC, RH and CL wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Luz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

JR, AC, AS, FP, TS, JM, RM, GM, ÉF, RH and CL declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rodrigues, J., Catão, A.M.L., dos Santos, A.S. et al. Relative humidity impacts development and activity against Aedes aegypti adults by granular formulations of Metarhizium humberi microsclerotia. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 105, 2725–2736 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-021-11157-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-021-11157-6

Keywords

Navigation