Clonal variations in CHO IGF signaling investigated by SILAC-based phosphoproteomics and LFQ-MS
- 94 Downloads
Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells are commonly used for the production of monoclonal antibodies. Omics technologies have been used to elucidate cellular switch points which result in higher monoclonal antibody (mAb) productivity and process yields in CHO and other biopharmaceutical production cell lines such as human or mouse. Currently, investigations of the phosphoproteome in CHO cell lines are rare yet could provide further insights into cellular mechanisms related to target product expression. Therefore, we investigated CHO IGF–signaling events using a comparative expression and phosphoproteomic approach in recombinant mAb-producing XL99 cell lines and corresponding parental strain. Differences were found on the level of protein expression between producer and parental cells in the exponential growth phase, mainly in proteins related to the lysosome, oligosaccharide metabolic processes, stress response, and cellular homeostasis. Within a stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC)–based phosphoproteomic investigation of IGF signaling, expected general regulation of phosphorylation sites and cell line–specific responses were observed. Detected early phosphorylation events can be associated to observed effects of IGF on cellular growth, metabolism, and cell cycle distribution. Producer cell line–specific signaling exhibited differences to parental cells in intracellular trafficking and transcriptional processes, along with an overall lower amount of observable cross talk to other signaling pathways. By combining label-free and SILAC-based expression for phosphoproteomic analyses, cellular differences in the highly interactive levels of signaling and protein expression were detected, indicating alterations in metabolism and growth following treatment with an exogenous growth factor. The characterization of cell lines and effects of IGF addition resulted in identification of metabolic switch points. With this data, it will be possible to modulate pathways towards increased CHO process yield by targeted application of small-molecule inhibitors.
KeywordsPhosphoproteomics Chinese hamster ovary Signaling Proteomics
We would like to thank the Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, University of Queensland-Brisbane, Australia (AIBN), for providing the CHO clones. In addition, we would like to honor the refinement of graphical illustrations by our bachelor student Marina Simunovic and our lab staff Larissa Leßmann for performing the western blots.
Compliance with ethical standards
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that he/she has no conflict of interest.
- Baillat D, Hakimi M-A, Näär AM, Shilatifard A, Cooch N, Shiekhattar R (2005) Integrator, a multiprotein mediator of small nuclear RNA processing, associates with the C-terminal repeat of RNA polymerase II. Cell 123:265–276Google Scholar
- Baycin-Hizal D, Tabb DL, Chaerkady R, Chen L, Lewis NE, Nagarajan H, Sarkaria V, Kumar A, Wolozny D, Colao J, Jacobson E, Tian Y, O’Meally RN, Krag SS, Cole RN, Palsson BO, Zhang H, Betenbaugh M (2012) Proteomic analysis of Chinese hamster ovary cells. J Proteome Res 11:5265–5276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Carlage T, Kshirsagar R, Zang L, Janakiraman V, Hincapie M, Lyubarskaya Y, Weiskopf A, Hancock WS (2012) Analysis of dynamic changes in the proteome of a Bcl-XL overexpressing Chinese hamster ovary cell culture during exponential and stationary phases. Biotechnol Prog 28:814–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dorai H (2013) Proteomic analysis of bioreactor cultures of an antibody expressing CHOGS cell line that promotes high productivity. J Proteomics Bioinform 06Google Scholar
- Feichtinger J, Hernández I, Fischer C, Hanscho M, Auer N, Hackl M, Jadhav V, Baumann M, Krempl PM, Schmidl C, Farlik M, Schuster M, Merkel A, Sommer A, Heath S, Rico D, Bock C, Thallinger GG, Borth N (2016) Comprehensive genome and epigenome characterization of CHO cells in response to evolutionary pressures and over time. Biotechnol Bioeng 113:2241–2253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gullerova M, Barta A, Lorkovic ZJ (2006) AtCyp59 is a multidomain cyclophilin from Arabidopsis thaliana that interacts with SR proteins and the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase II. RNA 12:631–643Google Scholar
- Kaushik P, Henry M, Clynes M, Meleady P (2018) The expression pattern of the phosphoproteome is significantly changed during the growth phases of recombinant CHO cell culture. Biotechnol J:e1700221Google Scholar
- Lee D-F, Kuo H-P, Chen C-T, Hsu J-M, Chou C-K, Wei Y, Sun H-L, Li L-Y, Ping B, Huang W-C, He X, Hung J-Y, Lai C-C, Ding Q, Su J-L, Yang J-Y, Sahin AA, Hortobagyi GN, Tsai F-J, Tsai C-H, Hung M-C (2007) IKK beta suppression of TSC1 links inflammation and tumor angiogenesis via the mTOR pathway. Cell 130:440–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Maldonado-Agurto R, Dickson AJ (2018) Multiplexed digital mRNA expression analysis profiles system-wide changes in mRNA abundance and responsiveness of UPR-specific gene expression changes during batch culture of recombinant Chinese hamster ovary cells. Biotechnol J 13:e1700429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Meleady P, Hoffrogge R, Henry M, Rupp O, Bort JH, Clarke C, Brinkrolf K, Kelly S, Müller B, Doolan P, Hackl M, Beckmann TF, Noll T, Grillari J, Barron N, Pühler A, Clynes M, Borth N (2012b) Utilization and evaluation of CHO-specific sequence databases for mass spectrometry based proteomics. Biotechnol Bioeng 109:1386–1394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Niewiadomski P, Kong JH, Ahrends R, Ma Y, Humke EW, Khan S, Teruel MN, Novitch BG, Rohatgi R (2014) Gli protein activity is controlled by multisite phosphorylation in vertebrate Hedgehog signaling. Cell Rep 6:168–181Google Scholar
- Rossignol M, Keriel A, Staub A, Egly JM (1999) Kinase activity and phosphorylation of the largest subunit of TFIIF transcription factor. J Biol Chem 274:22387–22392Google Scholar
- Thapar R (2015) Roles of prolyl isomerases in RNA-mediated gene expression. Biomolecules 5:974–999Google Scholar
- Trummer E, Fauland K, Seidinger S, Schriebl K, Lattenmayer C, Kunert R, Vorauer-Uhl K, Weik R, Borth N, Katinger H, Müller D (2006) Process parameter shifting. Part I. Effect of DOT, pH, and temperature on the performance of Epo-Fc expressing CHO cells cultivated in controlled batch bioreactors. Biotechnol Bioeng 94:1033–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wang Y, Ding Q, Yen C-J, Xia W, Izzo JG, Lang J-Y, Li C-W, Hsu JL, Miller SA, Wang X, Lee D-F, Hsu J-M, Huo L, Labaff AM, Liu D, Huang T-H, Lai C-C, Tsai F-J, Chang W-C, Chen C-H, Wu T-T, Buttar NS, Wang KK, Wu Y, Wang H, Ajani J, Hung M-C (2012) The crosstalk of mTOR/S6K1 and Hedgehog pathways. Cancer Cell 21:374–387Google Scholar
- Xu S, Liu C-X, Xu W, Huang L, Zhao J-Y, Zhao S-M (2017) Butyrate induces apoptosis by activating PDC and inhibiting complex I through SIRT3 inactivation. Signal. Transduct. Target. Ther. 2:16035Google Scholar
- Xu X, Nagarajan H, Lewis NE, Pan S, Cai Z, Liu X, Chen W, Xie M, Wang W, Hammond S, Andersen MR, Neff N, Passarelli B, Koh W, Fan HC, Wang J, Gui Y, Lee KH, Betenbaugh MJ, Quake SR, Famili I, Palsson BO, Wang J (2011) The genomic sequence of the Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-K1 cell line. Nat Biotechnol 29:735–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yi J-M, Huan X-J, Song S-S, Zhou H, Wang Y-Q, Miao Z-H (2016) Triptolide induces cell killing in multidrugresistant tumor cells via CDK7/RPB1 rather than XPB or p44. Mol. Cancer Ther. 15:1495–1503Google Scholar