Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 103, Issue 9, pp 3899–3913 | Cite as

The effect of environment on the microbiome associated with the roots of a native woody plant under different climate types in China

  • Peilin Chen
  • Meilin Zhao
  • Feng Tang
  • Yanmin Hu
  • Xianjun PengEmail author
  • Shihua ShenEmail author
Environmental biotechnology


Few studies have investigated the effect of environment on the root-associated microbiome, especially for woody plants in their native environment. The roots and rhizosphere soils of a native woody species (Broussonetia papyrifera) sampled across four different climate types in China were used to elucidate the influence of environment on the root-associated microbiome. Our results showed that the B. papyrifera root-associated microbiome contained abundant Proteobacteria and Basidiomycota, especially Pseudomonas and Rhizobium. The root-associated microbiomes were found to be significantly different under different climate types except for the bacterial community in the rhizosphere, and the proportion of bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTUs) shared among different climate types was lower than that of fungi. More than 50% of the total variance between microbiomes could be explained by 15 environmental factors, six of which, especially soil concentration phosphate and nitrate, had a significant effect. This study provided a comprehensive understanding of the root-associated microbiome of B. papyrifera and further confirmed the effect of environment on the root-associated microbiome of B. papyrifera under different climate types, with some exceptions in the rhizobacterial community and fungal OTUs. Our findings advanced knowledge of the effect of environment through an exploration of environmental factors and found that the nitrogen and phosphorus content represented the key factors.


Environmental factors Rhizosphere Endosphere Bacteria Fungi Broussonetia papyrifera 



This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31770360, 31870247), the Poverty Relief Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KFJ-FP-24), and the Huimin Technology Demonstration Project of the National Modern Agricultural Science and Technology Achievements City (Z151100001015008).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical statement

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

253_2019_9747_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (32 kb)
ESM 1 (XLSX 31 kb)
253_2019_9747_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (466 kb)
ESM 2 (PDF 465 kb)


  1. Asemaninejad A, Thorn RG, Lindo Z (2017) Experimental climate change modifies degradative succession in boreal peatland fungal communities. Microb Ecol 73(3):521–531. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bahram M, Hildebrand F, Forslund SK, Anderson JL, Soudzilovskaia NA, Bodegom PM, Bengtsson-Palme J, Anslan S, Coelho LP, Harend H, Huerta-Cepas J, Medema MH, Maltz MR, Mundra S, Olsson PA, Pent M, Polme S, Sunagawa S, Ryberg M, Tedersoo L, Bork P (2018) Structure and function of the global topsoil microbiome. Nature 560(7717):233–237. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bai Y, Müller DB, Srinivas G, Garrido-Oter R, Potthoff E, Rott M, Dombrowski N, Münch PC, Spaepen S, Remus-Emsermann M, Hüttel B, McHardy AC, Vorholt JA, Schulze-Lefert P (2015) Functional overlap of the Arabidopsis leaf and root microbiota. Nature 528:364–369. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beckers B, De Beeck MO, Weyens N, Acker RV, Van Montagu M, Boerjan W, Vangronsveld J (2015) Lignin engineering in field-grown poplar trees affects the endosphere bacterial microbiome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113(8):2312–2317.
  5. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B (2014) Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30(15):2114–2120. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bouffaud ML, Kyselková M, Gouesnard B, Grundmann G, Muller D, Moënne-Loccoz Y (2012) Is diversification history of maize influencing selection of soil bacteria by roots? Mol Ecol 21:195–206. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Fierer N, Pena AG, Goodrich JK, Gordon JI, Huttley GA, Kelley ST, Knights D, Koenig JE, Ley RE, Lozupone CA, McDonald D, Muegge BD, Pirrung M, Reeder J, Sevinsky JR, Turnbaugh PJ, Walters WA, Widmann J, Yatsunenko T, Zaneveld J, Knight R (2010) QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7(5):335–336. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chang CS, Liu HL, Moncada X, Seelenfreund A, Seelenfreund D, Chung KF (2015) A holistic picture of Austronesian migrations revealed by phylogeography of Pacific paper mulberry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112(44):13537–13542. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coleman-Derr D, Desgarennes D, Fonseca-Garcia C, Gross S, Clingenpeel S, Woyke T, North G, Visel A, Partida-Martinez LP, Tringe SG (2016) Plant compartment and biogeography affect microbiome composition in cultivated and native Agave species. New Phytol 209(2):798–811. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dastmalchi M, Chapman P, Yu J, Austin RS, Dhaubhadel S (2017) Transcriptomic evidence for the control of soybean root isoflavonoid content by regulation of overlapping phenylpropanoid pathways. BMC Genomics 18(1):70–86. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Zelicourt A, Al-Yousif M, Hirt H (2013) Rhizosphere microbes as essential partners for plant stress tolerance. Mol Plant 6(2):242–245. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Desgarennes D, Garrido E, Torres-Gomez MJ, Pena-Cabriales JJ, Partida-Martinez LP (2014) Diazotrophic potential among bacterial communities associated with wild and cultivated Agave species. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 90(3):844–857. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R (2011) UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27(16):2194–2200. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Edwards J, Johnson C, Santos-Medellin C, Lurie E, Podishetty NK, Bhatnagar S, Eisen JA, Sundaresan V (2015) Structure, variation, and assembly of the root-associated microbiomes of rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112(8):911–920. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Errasti AD, Carmarán CC, Novas MV (2010) Diversity and significance of fungal endophytes from living stems of naturalized trees from Argentina. Fungal Divers 41(1):29–40. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fahimipour AK, Kardish MR, Lang JM, Green JL, Eisen JA, Stachowicz JJ (2017) Global-scale structure of the eelgrass microbiome. Appl Environ Microbiol 83(12):1–12. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Friesen ML, Porter SS, Stark SC, von Wettberg EJ, Sachs JL, Martinez-Romero E (2011) Microbially mediated plant functional traits. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 42(1):23–46. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gadd GM (1999) Fungal production of citric and oxalic acid: importance in metal speciation, physiology and biogeochemical processes. Adv Microb Physiol 41:47–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Geel MV, Jacquemyn H, Plue J, Saar L, Kasari L, Peeters G, van Acker K, Honnay O, Ceulemans T (2017) Abiotic rather than biotic filtering shapes the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities of European seminatural grasslands. New Phytol 220:1262–1272. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Glassman SI, Wang IJ, Bruns TD (2017) Environmental filtering by pH and soil nutrients drives community assembly in fungi at fine spatial scales. Mol Ecol 26(24):6960–6973. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hazard C, Gosling P, Mitchell DT, Doohan FM, Bending GD (2014) Diversity of fungi associated with hair roots of ericaceous plants is affected by land use. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 87(3):586–600. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Innerebner G, Knief C, Vorholt JA (2011) Protection of Arabidopsis thaliana against leaf-pathogenic Pseudomonas syringae by Sphingomonas strains in a controlled model system. Appl Environ Microbiol 77(10):3202–3210. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Julien M, Lindow SE (2000) Role of leaf surface sugars in colonization of plants by bacterial epiphytes. Appl Environ Microbiol 66(1):369–374. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ko HJ, Oh SK, Jin JH, Son KH, Kim HP (2013) Inhibition of experimental systemic inflammation (septic inflammation) and chronic bronchitis by new phytoformula BL containing Broussonetia papyrifera and Lonicera japonica. Biomol Ther (Seoul) 21(1):66–71. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Laforest-Lapointe I, Messier C, Kembel SW (2016) Host species identity, site and time drive temperate tree phyllosphere bacterial community structure. Microbiome 4(1):27. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lauber CL, Hamady M, Knight R, Fierer N (2009) Pyrosequencing-based assessment of soil pH as a predictor of soil bacterial community structure at the continental scale. Appl Environ Microbiol 75(15):5111–5120. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li L, Tilman D, Lambers H, Zhang F-S (2014) Plant diversity and overyielding: insights from belowground facilitation of intercropping in agriculture. New Phytol 203(1):63–69. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lundberg DS, Lebeis SL, Paredes SH, Yourstone S, Gehring J, Malfatti S, Tremblay J, Engelbrektson A, Kunin V, del Rio TG, Edgar RC, Eickhorst T, Ley RE, Hugenholtz P, Tringe SG, Dangl JL (2012) Defining the core Arabidopsis thaliana root microbiome. Nature 488(7409):86–90. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Magoc T, Salzberg SL (2011) FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 27(21):2957–2963. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Malapi-Wight M, Salgado-Salazar C, Demers J, Veltri D, Croucha JA (2015) Draft genome sequence of Dactylonectria macrodidyma, a plant-pathogenic fungus in the Nectriaceae. Genome Announc 3(2).
  31. Maron JL, Marler M, Klironomos JN, Cleveland CC (2011) Soil fungal pathogens and the relationship between plant diversity and productivity. Ecol Lett 14(1):36–41. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morris MH, Smith ME, Rizzo DM, Rejmanek M, Bledsoe CS (2008) Contrasting ectomycorrhizal fungal communities on the roots of co-occurring oaks (Quercus spp.) in a California woodland. New Phytol 178(1):167–176. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Naylor D, DeGraaf S, Purdom E, Coleman-Derr D (2017) Drought and host selection influence bacterial community dynamics in the grass root microbiome. ISME J 11(12):2691–2704. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Neal AL, Ahmad S, Gordon-Weeks R, Ton J (2012) Benzoxazinoids in root exudates of maize attract pseudomonas putida to the rhizosphere. PLoS One 7(4):e35498.
  35. Niu B, Paulson JN, Zheng XQ, Kolter R (2017) Simplified and representative bacterial community of maize roots. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114(12):E2450–E2459. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Oldroyd GE (2013) Speak, friend, and enter: signalling systems that promote beneficial symbiotic associations in plants. Nat Rev Microbiol 11(4):252–263. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Peay KG, von Sperber C, Cardarelli E, Toju H, Francis CA, Chadwick OA, Vitousek PM (2017) Convergence and contrast in the community structure of Bacteria, Fungi and Archaea along a tropical elevation-climate gradient. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 93(5).
  38. Peiffera JA, Sporb A, Korenb O, Jinb Z, Tringed SG, Dangle JL, Bucklera ES, Ley RE (2013) Diversity and heritability of the maize rhizosphere microbiome under field conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110(16):6548–6553. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Peng XJ, Shen S (2018) The paper mulberry: a novel model system for woody plant research. Chin Bull Bot 53(3):372–381Google Scholar
  40. Peng XJ, Teng LH, Wang XM, Wang YC, Shen SH (2014) De novo assembly of expressed transcripts and global transcriptomic analysis from seedlings of the paper mulberry (Broussonetia kazinoki x Broussonetia papyifera). PLoS One 9(5):e97487. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Peng XJ, Liu H, Chen PL, Tang F, Hu YM, Wang FF, Pi Z, Zhao ML, Chen NZ, Chen H, Zhang XK, Yan XQ, Liu M, Fu XJ, Zhao GF, Yao P, Wang LL, Dai H, Li XM, Xiong W, Xu WC, Zheng HK, Yu HY, Shen SH (2019) A chromosome-scale genome assembly of paper mulberry (Broussonetia papyrifera) provides new insights into its forage and papermaking usage. Mol Plant.
  42. Philippot L, Raaijmakers JM, Lemanceau P, van der Putten WH (2013) Going back to the roots: the microbial ecology of the rhizosphere. Nat Rev Microbiol 11(11):789–799. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pi Z, Zhao ML, Peng XJ, Shen SH (2017) Phosphoproteomic analysis of paper mulberry reveals phosphorylation functions in chilling tolerance. J Proteome Res 16(5):1944–1961. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Robinson RJ, Fraaije BA, Clark IM, Jackson RW, Hirsch PR, Mauchline TH (2016) Wheat seed embryo excision enables the creation of axenic seedlings and Koch’s postulates testing of putative bacterial endophytes. Sci Rep 6:25581. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Santhanam R, Luu VT, Weinhold A, Goldberg J, Oh Y, Baldwin IT (2015) Native root-associated bacteria rescue a plant from a sudden-wilt disease that emerged during continuous cropping. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112(36):E5013–E5020. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Santos-Medellin C, Edwards J, Liechty Z, Nguyen B, Sundaresan V (2017) Drought stress results in a compartment-specific restructuring of the rice root-associated microbiomes. MBio 8(4):e00764–e00717. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sawers RJ, Gutjahr C, Paszkowski U (2008) Cereal mycorrhiza: an ancient symbiosis in modern agriculture. Trends Plant Sci 13(2):93–97. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shakya M, Gottel N, Castro H, Yang ZK, Gunter L, Labbé J, Muchero W, Bonito G, Vilgalys R, Tuskan G, Podar M, Schadt CW (2013) A multifactor analysis of fungal and bacterial community structure in the root microbiome of mature Populus deltoides trees. PLoS One 8(10):e76382. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shen SH, Peng XJ (2017) The black tech in “paper mulberry poverty alleviation” fills the lack of crude protein feed material of Chinese animal husbandry. Sci Technol Dev 13(6):435–442. Google Scholar
  50. Silva UC, Medeiros JD, Leite LR, Morais DK, Cuadros-Orellana S, Oliveira CA, de Paula Lana UG, Gomes EA, Dos Santos VL (2017) Long-term rock phosphate fertilization impacts the microbial communities of maize rhizosphere. Front Microbiol 8:1266. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Souza R, Ambrosini A, Passaglia LM (2015) Plant growth-promoting bacteria as inoculants in agricultural soils. Genet Mol Biol 38(4):401–419. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stefanova P, Taseva M, Georgieva T, Gotcheva V, Angelov A (2014) A modified CTAB method for DNA extraction from soybean and meat products. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 27(3):3803–3810. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Swamy CT, Gayathri D, Devaraja TN, Bandekar M, D'Souza SE, Meena RM, Ramaiah N (2016) Plant growth promoting potential and phylogenetic characteristics of a lichenized nitrogen fixing bacterium, Enterobacter cloacae. J Basic Microbiol 56(12):1369–1379. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Takahashi S, Katanuma H, Abe K, Kera Y (2017) Identification of alkaline phosphatase genes for utilizing a flame retardant, Tris(2-chloroethyl) phosphate, in Sphingobium sp. strain TCM1. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 101(5):2153–2162. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Van Elsas JDV, Trevors JT, Starodub ME (1988) Bacterial conjugation between pseudomonads in the rhizosphere of wheat. FEMS Microbiol Lett 4(5):299–306.
  56. Wagner MR, Lundberg DS, Del Rio TG, Tringe SG, Dangl JL, Mitchell-Olds T (2016) Host genotype and age shape the leaf and root microbiomes of a wild perennial plant. Nat Commun 7:12151. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wang Y, Sheng HF, He Y, Wu JY, Jiang YX, Tam NF, Zhou HW (2012) Comparison of the levels of bacterial diversity in freshwater, intertidal wetland, and marine sediments by using millions of Illumina tags. Appl Environ Microbiol 78(23):8264–8271. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wang JS, Liu JS, Peng XJ, Ni ZY, Wang GJ, Shen SH (2014) Applied hybrid paper mulberry in ecological virescence of the coastal saline. Tianjin Agric Sci 20:95–101Google Scholar
  59. Wani ZA, Kumar A, Sultan P, Bindu K, Riyaz-Ul-Hassan S, Ashraf N (2017) Mortierella alpina CS10E4, an oleaginous fungal endophyte of Crocus sativus L. enhances apocarotenoid biosynthesis and stress tolerance in the host plant. Sci Rep 7(1):8598. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Xiao X, Chen W, Zong L, Yang J, Jiao S, Lin Y, Wang E, Wei G (2017) Two cultivated legume plants reveal the enrichment process of the microbiome in the rhizocompartments. Mol Ecol 26(6):1641–1651. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yan J, Wang PS, Du HZ, Zhang QE (2011) First report of black spot caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides on paper mulberry in China. Plant Dis 95(7):880–880. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yeoh YK, Paungfoo-Lonhienne C, Dennis PG, Robinson N, Ragan MA, Schmidt S, Hugenholtz P (2016) The core root microbiome of sugarcanes cultivated under varying nitrogen fertilizer application. Environ Microbiol 18(5):1338–1351. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yoneyama K, Mori N, Sato T, Yoda A, Xie XN, Okamoto M, Iwanaga M, Ohnishi T, Nishiwaki H, Asami T, Yokota T, Akiyama K, Yoneyama K, Nomura T (2018) Conversion of carlactone to carlactonoic acid is a conserved function of MAX1 homologs in strigolactone biosynthesis. New Phytol 218(4):1522–1533. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. You YH, Park JM, Seo YG, Lee W, Kang MS, Kim JG (2017) Distribution, characterization, and diversity of the endophytic fungal communities on Korean seacoasts showing contrasting geographic conditions. Mycobiology 45(3):150–159. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yu P, Wang C, Baldauf JA, Tai H, Gutjahr C, Hochholdinger F, Li C (2017) Root type and soil phosphate determine the taxonomic landscape of colonizing fungi and the transcriptome of field-grown maize roots. New Phytol 217(3):1240–1253. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zarraonaindia I, Owens SM, Weisenhorn P, West K, Hampton-Marcell J, Lax S, Bokulich NA, Mills DA, Martin G, Taghavi S, van der Lelie D, Gilbert JA (2015) The soil microbiome influences grapevine-associated microbiota. MBio 6(2):e02527–e02514. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zhai XQ, Zeng H, Liu YP, Liu F (2012) Change of nutrients and shape of Broussonetia papyrifera leaves from different clones. J Northeast Forest Univ 40(11):38–52Google Scholar
  68. Zhang Y, Ni J, Tang F, Pei K, Luo Y, Jiang L, Sun L, Liang Y (2016) Root-associated fungi of Vaccinium carlesii in subtropical forests of China: intra- and inter-annual variability and impacts of human disturbances. Sci Rep 6:22399. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Plant Resources, Institute of BotanyChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations