Advertisement

Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 102, Issue 13, pp 5741–5751 | Cite as

Use of carbon steel ball bearings to determine the effect of biocides and corrosion inhibitors on microbiologically influenced corrosion under flow conditions

Environmental biotechnology
  • 80 Downloads

Abstract

A consortium of sulfate-reducing bacteria consisting mostly of Desulfovibrio, Desulfomicrobium, and Desulfocurvus from oil field produced water was cultivated in a chemostat, receiving medium with 20 mM formate and 10 mM sulfate as the energy and 1 mM acetate as the carbon source. The chemostat effluent, containing 5 mM sulfide and 0.5 mM of residual acetate, was passed through 1-ml syringe columns with 60 carbon steel ball bearings (BBs) of 53.6 ± 0.1 mg each at a flow rate of 0.8 ml/h per column. These were treated every 5 days with 1.6 ml of 300 ppm of glutaraldehyde (Glut), tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)phosphonium sulfate (THPS), benzalkonium chloride (BAC), or Glut/BAC, a mixture of Glut and BAC. Alternatively, BBs were treated with 33% (v/v) of a water-soluble (CR_W) or an oil-soluble (CR_O1 or CR_O3) corrosion inhibitor for 20 s after which the corrosion inhibitor was drained off and BBs were packed into columns. The effluent of untreated control columns had no acetate. Treatment with the chemically reactive biocides Glut and THPS, as well as with Glut/BAC, gave a transient increase of acetate indicating decreased microbial activity. This was not seen with BAC alone indicating it to be the least effective biocide. Relative to untreated BBs (100%), those treated periodically with Glut, THPS, BAC, or Glut/BAC had a general weight loss corrosion rate of 91, 81, 45, and 36% of the untreated rate of 0.104 ± 0.004 mm/year, respectively. Single treatment with corrosion inhibitors decreased corrosion to 48, 2, and 1% of the untreated rate for CR_W, CR_O1 and CR_O3, respectively. Analysis of the distribution of corrosion rates from the weight loss of individual BBs (N = 120) indicated the presence of a more slowly and a more rapidly corroding group. BAC treatment prevented emergence of the latter, and this quaternary ammonium detergent appeared most effective in decreasing corrosion not because of its biocidal properties, but because of its corrosion inhibitory properties.

Keywords

Corrosion rate Sulfate-reducing bacteria Carbon steel Flow Microbial community Biocide Oil field 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Rhonda Clark and Yin Shen for administrative and Tekle Fida and Jaspreet Mand for technical support. We thank Kirk Miner and Pierre Blais from Baker Hughes Canada and Bei Yin from Dow Microbial Control for providing samples of biocides and corrosion inhibitors.

Funding information

This work was supported by an NSERC Industrial Research Chair Award to GV, which was also supported by BP America Production Co., Baker Hughes Canada, Computer Modeling Group Limited, ConocoPhillips Company, Dow Microbial Control, Enbridge, Enerplus Corporation, Intertek, Oil Search (PNG) Limited, Shell Global Solutions International, Suncor Energy Inc., and Yara Norge AS, as well as by Alberta Innovates.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

253_2018_8974_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (587 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 586 kb)

References

  1. Alberta Energy Regulator (2013) Report 2013-B: pipeline performance in Alberta. 1–104Google Scholar
  2. Al-Shamari AR, Al-Mithin AW, Olabisi O, Mathew A (2013) Developing a metric for microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) in oilfield water handling systems. NACE International Conference and Expo, Corrosion 2013, Paper 2299. doi:  https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.3234.1446
  3. An D, Dong X, An A, Park HS, Strous M, Voordouw G (2016) Metagenomic analysis indicates Epsilonproteobacteria as a potential cause of microbial corrosion in pipelines injected with bisulfite. Front Microbiol 7:28.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00028 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Angell P, Machowski WJ, Paul PP, Wall CM, Lyle FF (1997) A multiple chemostat system for consortia studies on microbially influenced corrosion. J Microbiol Methods 30:173–178.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(97)00057-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Auvinen H, Nevatalo LM, Kaksonen AH, Puhakka J (2009) Low-temperature (9°C) AMD treatment in a sulfidogenic bioreactor dominated by a mesophilic Desulfomicrobium species. Biotechnol Bioeng 104:740–751.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.22434 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Badziong W, Thauer RK (1978) Growth yields and growth rates of Desulfovibrio vulgaris (Marburg) growing on hydrogen plus sulfate and hydrogen plus thiosulfate as the sole energy sources. Arch Microbiol 117:209–214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bartlett K, Kramer J (2011) Comparative performance of industrial water treatment biocides. NACE International Conference and Expo, Corrosion 2011, Paper 11399Google Scholar
  8. Beech IB, Sunny Cheung CW, Patrick Chan CS, Hill MA, Franco R, Lino AR (1994) Study of parameters implicated in the biodeterioration of mild steel in the presence of different species of sulphate-reducing bacteria. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 34:289–303.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0964-8305(94)90089-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chang Y-J, Hung C-H, Lee J-W, Chang Y-T, Lin F-Y, Chuang C-J (2015) A study of microbial population dynamics associated with corrosion rates influenced by corrosion control materials. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 102:330–338.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.03.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cline JD (1969) Spectrophotometric determination of hydrogen sulfide. Limnol Oceanogr 14:454–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cord-Ruwisch R, Widdel F (1986) Corroding iron as a hydrogen source for sulphate reduction in growing cultures of sulphate-reducing bacteria. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 25:169–174.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00938942 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dall’Agnol LT, Cordas CM, Moura JJG (2014) Influence of respiratory substrate in carbon steel corrosion by a sulphate reducing prokaryote model organism. Bioelectrochemistry 97:43–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioelechem.2013.10.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dinh HT, Kuever J, Mussmann M, Hassel AW, Stratmann M, Widdel F (2004) Iron corrosion by novel anaerobic microorganisms. Nature 427:829–832.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02321 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dong X, Kleiner M, Sharp CE, Thorson E, Li C, Liu D, Strous M (2017). Fast and simple analysis of MiSeq amplicon sequencing data with MetaAmp. bioRxiv. Jan 1, 131631; doi:  https://doi.org/10.1101/131631
  15. Duncan KE, Perez-Ibarra BM, Jenneman G, Harris JB, Webb R (2014) The effect of corrosion inhibitors on microbial communities associated with corrosion in a model flow cell system. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:907–918.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-4906-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Enning D, Garrelfs J (2014) Corrosion of iron by sulfate-reducing bacteria: new views of an old problem. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:1226–1236.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02848-13 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Enning D, Venzlaff H, Garrelfs J, Dinh HT, Meyer V, Mayrhofer K, Hassel AW, Stratmann M, Widdel F (2012) Marine sulfate-reducing bacteria cause serious corrosion of iron under electroconductive biogenic mineral crust. Environ Microbiol 14:1772–1787.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02778.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Enzien M V., Pope DH, Wu MM, Frank J (1996) Nonbiocidal control of microbiologically influenced corrosion using organic film-forming inhibitors. NACE International Conference and Expo, Corrosion 1996, Paper 290Google Scholar
  19. Ganzer GA, McIlwaine DB, Diemer JA, Freid M, Russo M (2001) Applications of glutaraldehyde in the control of MIC. NACE International Conference and Expo, Corrosion 2001, Paper 01281Google Scholar
  20. Greene EA, Brunelle V, Jenneman GE, Voordouw G (2006) Synergistic inhibition of microbial sulfide production by combinations of the metabolic inhibitor nitrite and biocides. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:7897–7901.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01526-06 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Harris JB, Webb R, Jenneman G (2010) Evaluating corrosion inhibitors as a means to control MIC in produced water. NACE International Conference and Expo, Corrosion 2010, Paper 10256Google Scholar
  22. Islam S, Karr E (2013) Examination of metal corrosion by Desulfomicrobium thermophilum, Archaeoglobus fulgidus, and Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus. BioOne 84:59–64.  https://doi.org/10.1893/0005-3155-84.2.59 Google Scholar
  23. Jack T (2002) Biological corrosion failures. ASM Handb Vol 11 Fail Anal Prev 11:881–890Google Scholar
  24. Kahrilas GA, Blotevogel J, Stewart PS, Borch T (2015) Biocides in hydraulic fracturing fluids: a critical review of their usage, mobility, degradation, and toxicity. Environ Sci Technol 49:16–32.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es503724k CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kelland MA (2009) Production chemicals for the oil and gas industry. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee W, Characklis WG (1993) Corrosion of mild steel under anaerobic biofilm. Corrosion 49:186–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leu JY, McGovern-Traa CP, Porter JR, Hamilton WA (1999) The same species of sulphate-reducing Desulfomicrobium occur in different oil field environments in the North Sea. Lett Appl Microbiol 29:246–252.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00628.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Little BJ, Lee JS, Ray RI (2006) Diagnosing microbiologically influenced corrosion: a state-of-the-art review. Corrosion 62:1006–1017.  https://doi.org/10.5006/1.3278228 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Menon P, Voordouw G (2018) Impact of light oil toxicity on sulfide production by acetate-oxidizing, sulfate-reducing bacteria. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 126:208–215.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.11.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miranda E, Bethencourt M, Botana FJ, Cano MJ, Sanchez-Amaya JM, Corzo A, de Lomas JG, Fardeau ML, Ollivier B (2006) Biocorrosion of carbon steel alloys by an hydrogenotrophic sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio capillatus isolated from a Mexican oil field separator. Corros Sci 48:2417–2431.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2005.09.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Obuekwe CO, Al-Jadi ZK, Al-Saleh ES (2008) Comparative hydrocarbon utilization by hydrophobic and hydrophilic variants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Appl Microbiol 105:1876–1887.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03887.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Peng C, Park JK (1994) Principal factors affecting microbiologically influenced corrosion of carbon steel 8. Corros Sci 50:669–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pinnock T, Voordouw G (2016) Use of carbon steel beads to determine microbially-influenced corrosion under flow conditions. NACE International Conference and Expo, Corrosion 2016, Paper 7772Google Scholar
  34. Roden EE, Lovley DR (1993) Dissimilatory Fe(III) reduction by the marine microorganism Desulfuromonas acetoxidans. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:734–742PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Schaeufele P (1984) Advances in quaternary ammonium biocides. J Am Oil Chem Soc 61:387–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sharma M, An D, Baxter K, Henderson M, Voordouw G (2016) Understanding the role of microbes in frequent coiled tubing failures. NACE International Conference and Expo, Corrosion 2016, Paper 7815Google Scholar
  37. Shen Y, Voordouw G (2015) Primers for dsr genes and most-probable number method for detection of sulfate-reducing bacteria in oil reservoirs. In: McGenity T, Timmis K, Nogales B (eds) Hydrocarbon and lipid microbiology protocols. Springer-Verlag, Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  38. Stipaničev M, Turcu F, Esnault L, Schweitzer EW, Kilian R, Basseguy R (2013) Corrosion behavior of carbon steel in presence of sulfate-reducing bacteria in seawater environment. Electrochim Acta 113:390–406.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2013.09.059 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Videla H (2002) Prevention and control of biocorrosion. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 49:259–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Voordouw G, Grigoryan AA, Lambo A, Lin S, Park HS, Jack TR, Coombe D, Clay B, Zhang F, Ertmoed R, Miner K, Arensdorf JJ (2009) Sulfide remediation by pulsed injection of nitrate into a low temperature Canadian heavy oil reservoir. Environ Sci Technol 43:9512–9518.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es902211j CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Voordouw G, Menon P, Pinnock T, Sharma M, Shen Y, Venturelli A, Voordouw J, Sexton A (2016) Use of homogeneously-sized carbon steel ball bearings to study microbially-influenced corrosion in oil field samples. Front Microbiol 7:351.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00351 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Voordouw G, Pinnock T, Voordouw J (2017) Effect of biocides and corrosion inhibitors on SRB-mediated MIC under flow conditions. NACE International CORROSION 2017 Conference & Expo, New Orleans, LA, March 27–30, 2017. Paper 9650Google Scholar
  43. Widdel F, Bak F (1992) Gram-negative mesophilic sulfate-reducing bacteria. In: Balows A, Trüper H, Dworkin M, Harder W, Schleifer H (eds) The prokaryotes, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, pp 3352–3389CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Petroleum Microbiology Research Group, Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations