Skip to main content
Log in

Simultaneous biological removal of phenol, sulfide, and nitrate using expanded granular sludge bed reactor

  • Environmental biotechnology
  • Published:
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biological removal of sulfide, nitrate, and phenol at loading rates of 600 g S/(m3 day), 900 g N/(m3 day), and 450 g C/(m3 day), respectively, from synthetic wastewaters was achieved in an expanded granular sludge bed (EGSB) reactor, whose rates are much higher than literature works and are considered feasible for handling high-strength petrochemical wastewaters without dilution. Effects of C/S ratio (2–2.5:1) on EGSB performance were noted insignificantly. The strains Bacillus sp., Thauera sp., and Pseudomonas sp. were the heterotrophic denitrifiers and the strains Thiobacillus sp., Azoarcus sp., and Sulfurovum sp. were the autotrophic denitrifiers in the EGSB granules. The EGSB reactor experienced biological breakdown at loadings higher than 1200 g S/(m3 day), 1800 g N/(m3 day), and 900 g C/(m3 day) by the following mechanism: high sulfide first inhibits heterotrophic denitrifies (Bacillus sp. and Pseudomonas sp.), thereby accumulating nitrite in the system; then, the accumulated nitrite inhibits autotrophic denitrifiers (Thiobacillus sp., Azoarcus sp., and Sulfurovum sp.) to complete breakdown of the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • APHA (2005) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 21st edn. American Public Health Association, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Beristain-Cardoso R, Texier AC, Alpuche-Solis A, Gomez J, Razo-Flores E (2009a) Phenol and sulfide oxidation in a denitrifying biofilm reactor and its microbial community analysis. Process Biochem 44(1):23–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beristain-Cardoso R, Texier AC, Sierra-Alvarea R, Razo-Flore EJ, Field A, Gomez J (2009b) Effect of initial sulfide concentration on sulfide and phenol oxidation under denitrifying conditions. Chemosphere 74:200–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cadena F, Peters RW (1988) Evaluation of chemical oxidizer for hydrogen sulfide control. J Water Pollut Control Fed 60(7):1259–1263

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Ren NQ, Wang AJ,  Yu  ZG, Lee DJ (2008) Simultaneous biological removal of sulfur, nitrogen and carbon using EGSB reactor. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 78:1057–1063

  • Chen C, Wang A, Ren N, Lee DJ, Lai JY (2009) High-rate denitrifying sulfide removal process in expanded granular sludge bed reactor. Bioresour Technol 100(7):2316–2319

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conner JA, Beitle RR, Duncan K, Kolhatkar R, Sublette KL (2000) Biotreatment of refinery spent-sulfidic caustic using an enrichment culture immobilized in a novel support matrix. Appl Biochem and Biotechnol Part A Enzym Eng Biotechnol 84–86:707–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eiroa M, Vilar A, Amor L, Kennes C, Veiga MC (2005) Biodegradation and effect of formaldehyde and phenol on the denitrification process. Water Res 39(2–3):449–455

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huang C, Li Z, Chen F, Liu Q, Zhao Y, Zhou J, Wang A (2015) Microbial community structure and function in response to the shift of sulfide/nitrate loading ratio during the denitrifying sulfide removal process. Bioresour Technol 197(2):227–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee DJ, Wong BT, Adav SS (2013) Azoarcus taiwanensis sp. nov., a denitrifying species isolated from a hot spring. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98(3):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B, Mao Y, Bergaust L, Bakken LR, Frostegard A (2013) Strains in the genus Thauera exhibit remarkably different denitrification regulatory phenotypes. Environ Microbiol 15(10):2816–2828

  • Liu C, Zhao C, Wang A, Guo Y, Lee DJ (2015a) Denitrifying sulfide removal process on high-salinity wastewaters. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99(15):6463–6469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu C, Zhao D, Yan L, Wang A, Gu Y, Lee DJ (2015b) Elemental sulfur formation and nitrogen removal from wastewaters by autotrophic denitrifiers and anammox bacteria. Bioresour Technol 191(5):332–336

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olmos A, Olguıin P, Fajardo C, Razo-Flores E, Monroy O (2004) Physicochemical characterization of spent caustic from the OXIMER process and source waters from Mexican oil refineries. Energ Fuel 18:302–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaee A, Godini H, Dehestaniathar S, Yazdanbakhsh A, Mosavi G, Kazemnejad A (2008) Biological denitrification by Pseudomonas stutzeri immobilized on microbial cellulose. World J Microb Biot 24(11):2397–2402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spence J, Bottrell H, Higgo W, Harrison I, Fallick AE (2001) Denitrification and phenol degradation in a contaminated aquifer. J Contam Hydrol 53(3):305–318

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas S, Sarfaraz S, Mishra LC, Iyengar L (2002) Degradation of phenol and henolic compounds by a defined denitrifying bacterial culture. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 8(1):57–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Truper HG, Schlegel HG (1964) Sulfur metabolism of Thiorhodaceae. I. Quantitative measurements on growing cells of Chromatium okenii. Anton Leeuw Int 30(1):225–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbaendert I, Boon N, Vos PD, Heylen K (2011) Denitrification is a common feature among members of the genus Bacillus. Syst Appl Microbiol 34(5):385–391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang A, Du D, Ren N, van Groenestijn JW (2005) An innovative process of simultaneous desulfurization and denitrification by Thiobacillus denitrification. J Environ Sci Health A 40(5):1939–1949

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu C, Zhou Y, Wang P, Guo S (2015) Improving hydrolysis acidification by limited aeration in the pretreatment of petrochemical wastewater. Bioresour Technol 194(2):256–262

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Q, Xiong P, Ding P, Chu L, Wang J (2015) Treatment of petrochemical wastewater by microaerobic hydrolysis and anoxic/oxic processes and analysis of bacterial diversity. Bioresour Technol 196(5):169–175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 21307160 and the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province under Grant No. ZR2013EEQ030.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Duu-Jong Lee.

Ethics declarations

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, C., Han, K., Lee, DJ. et al. Simultaneous biological removal of phenol, sulfide, and nitrate using expanded granular sludge bed reactor. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100, 4211–4217 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7293-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7293-2

Keywords

Navigation