Biogas desulfurization using autotrophic denitrification process
The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of an autotrophic denitrification process for desulfurization of biogas produced from a chicken manure digester. A laboratory scale upflow fixed bed reactor (UFBR) was operated for 105 days and fed with sodium sulfide or H2S scrubbed from the biogas and nitrate as electron donor and acceptor, respectively. The S/N ratio (2.5 mol/mol) of the feed solution was kept constant throughout the study. When the UFBR was fed with sodium sulfide solution with an influent pH of 7.7, about 95 % sulfide and 90 % nitrate removal efficiencies were achieved. However, the inlet of the UFBR was clogged several times due to the accumulation of biologically produced elemental sulfur particles and the clogging resulted in operational problems. When the UFBR was fed with the H2S absorbed from the biogas and operated with an influent pH of 8–9, around 98 % sulfide and 97 % nitrate removal efficiencies were obtained. In this way, above 95 % of the H2S in the biogas was removed as elemental sulfur and the reactor effluent was reused as scrubbing liquid without any clogging problem.
KeywordsClogging Elemental sulfur Nitrate Scrubbing Sulfide oxidation
This work was financially supported by Marmara University Scientific Research Committee BAPKO (Project No. FEN-A-100713-0323).
Compliance with ethical standards
This study was funded by Marmara University Scientific Research Committee BAPKO (Project No. FEN-A-100713-0323).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- APHA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. APHA-AWWA-WEF, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- Chen Y, Fan Z, Ma L, Yin J, Luo M, Cai W (2014) Performance of three pilot-scale immobilized-cell biotrickling filters for removal of hydrogen sulfide from a contaminated air steam. Saudi J Biol Sci (0) doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2014.05.008
- Deublein D, Steinhauser A (2011) Biogas from waste and renewable resources: an introduction. John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
- Dinamarca C (2014) Anaerobic expanded granular sludge bed (EGSB) reactor for the removal of sulphide by autotrophic denitrification. Journal Homepage: www IJEE IEEFoundation org 5(1):111–118Google Scholar
- Dolejs P, Paclík L, Maca J, Pokorna D, Zabranska J, Bartacek J (2014) Effect of S/N ratio on sulfide removal by autotrophic denitrification. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol: 1-10Google Scholar
- Findlay AJ, Gartman A, MacDonald DJ, Hanson TE, Shaw TJ, Luther GW (2014) Distribution and size fractionation of elemental sulfur in aqueous environments: the Chesapeake Bay and Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Geochim Cosmochim Acta (0) doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2014.07.032
- Guerrero RB, Bevilaqua D (2015) Biotrickling filtration of biogas produced from the wastewater treatment plant of a brewery. J Environ EngGoogle Scholar
- Ko JH, Xu Q, Jang Y-C (2015) Emissions and control of hydrogen sulfide at landfills: a review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology (just-accepted):00–00Google Scholar
- López ME, Rene ER, Veiga MC, Kennes C (2012) Biogas technologies and cleaning techniques environmental chemistry for a sustainable world. Springer, pp 347-377Google Scholar
- Montebello AM, Fernández M, Almenglo F, Ramírez M, Cantero D, Baeza M, Gabriel D (2012) Simultaneous methylmercaptan and hydrogen sulfide removal in the desulfurization of biogas in aerobic and anoxic biotrickling filters. Chem Eng J 200–202(0):237–246. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.06.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Oh S, Kim K, Choi H, Cho J, Kim I (2000) Kinetics and physiological characteristics of autotrophic dentrification by denitrifying sulfur bacteria. Water Sci Technol 42(3–4):59–68Google Scholar
- Petersson A, WeLLInGer A (2009) Biogas upgrading technologies—developments and innovations. IEA Bioenergy 20Google Scholar
- Syed M, Soreanu G, Falletta P, Béland M (2006) Removal of hydrogen sulfide from gas streams using biological processes—a review. Can Biosyst Eng 48:2Google Scholar
- Üresin E, Saraç Hİ, Sarıoğlan A, Ay Ş, Akgün F (2014) An experimental study for H2S and CO2 removal via caustic scrubbing system. Process Safety and Environmental Protection (0) doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2014.06.013