A propidium monoazide–quantitative PCR method for the detection and quantification of viable Enterococcus faecalis in large-volume samples of marine waters
- 496 Downloads
The development of rapid detection assays of cell viability is essential for monitoring the microbiological quality of water systems. Coupling propidium monoazide with quantitative PCR (PMA-qPCR) has been successfully applied in different studies for the detection and quantification of viable cells in small-volume samples (0.25–1.00 mL), but it has not been evaluated sufficiently in marine environments or in large-volume samples. In this study, we successfully integrated blue light-emitting diodes for photoactivating PMA and membrane filtration into the PMA-qPCR assay for the rapid detection and quantification of viable Enterococcus faecalis cells in 10-mL samples of marine waters. The assay was optimized in phosphate-buffered saline and seawater, reducing the qPCR signal of heat-killed E. faecalis cells by 4 log10 and 3 log10 units, respectively. Results suggest that high total dissolved solid concentration (32 g/L) in seawater can reduce PMA activity. Optimal PMA-qPCR standard curves with a 6-log dynamic range and detection limit of 102 cells/mL were generated for quantifying viable E. faecalis cells in marine waters. The developed assay was compared with the standard membrane filter (MF) method by quantifying viable E. faecalis cells in seawater samples exposed to solar radiation. The results of the developed PMA-qPCR assay did not match that of the standard MF method. This difference in the results reflects the different physiological states of E. faecalis cells in seawater. In conclusion, the developed assay is a rapid (∼5 h) method for the quantification of viable E. faecalis cells in marine recreational waters, which should be further improved and tested in different seawater settings.
KeywordsEnterococcus faecalis Marine recreational waters Propidium monoazide Quantitative PCR
This work was supported by the National Council for Scientific Research, Lebanon and the University Research Board at the American University of Beirut. The authors thank Lucy Semerjian, Nesta Sagherian, and Houssam Shaib for their advice throughout the study. The authors also thank Mahmoud Hakim and Salam Abyad for their help in the design of the light apparatus.
- Agudelo RM, Codony F, Adrados B, Fittipaldi M, Peñuela G, Morató J (2010) Monitoring bacterial faecal contamination in waters using multiplex real-time PCR assay for Bacteroides spp. and faecal enterococci. Water SA 36:127–132Google Scholar
- Ferretti JA, Tran HV, Cosgrove E, Protonentis J, Loftin V, Conklin CS, Grant RN (2011) Comparison of Enterococcus density estimates in marine beach and bay samples by real-time polymerase chain reaction, membrane filtration and defined substrate testing. Mar Pollut Bull 62:1066–1072PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kim S-W, Raynor PC, Kuehn TH, Goyal SM, Ramakrishnan MA, Anantharaman S, Farnsworth JE (2008) Optimizing the recovery of surrogates for bacterial bioterrorism agents from ventilation filters. Clean 36:601–608Google Scholar
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2009) Method 1600: Enterococci in water by membrane filtration using membrane-Enterococcus indoxyl-β-D-glucoside agar (mEI). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar