Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 97, Issue 8, pp 3293–3300 | Cite as

Enzyme-based formulations for decontamination: current state and perspectives

  • Navdeep Grover
  • Cerasela Zoica Dinu
  • Ravi S. Kane
  • Jonathan S. Dordick
Mini-Review

Abstract

Development of noncorrosive, cost-effective, environmentally benign, and broad-spectrum antimicrobial formulations is necessary for clinical, industrial, and domestic purposes. Many current decontaminating formulations are effective, but they require the use of strong oxidizing agents or organic solvents that have deleterious effects on human health and the surrounding environment. The emergence of antibiotic-resistant pathogens has motivated researchers to develop enzyme-based self-decontaminating formulations as alternatives to such chemical decontamination approaches. Hydrolytic and oxidative enzymes can be used to deactivate pathogens, including bacteria, spores, viruses, and fungi. Laccases, haloperoxidases, and perhydrolases catalyze the generation of biocidal oxidants, such as iodine, bromine, hypohalous acid (e.g., HOCl or HOBr), and peracetic acid. These oxidants have broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity. Due to the multi-pathway action of these oxidants, it has proven extremely difficult for microbes to gain resistance. Thus far, few examples have been reported on enzyme-based antimicrobial formulations. For these reasons, various enzyme-containing antimicrobial formulations are highlighted in this review.

Keywords

Decontamination Antimicrobial Laccase Haloperoxidase Perhydrolase Nanocomposites 

References

  1. Alexandre G, Zhulin IB (2000) Laccases are widespread in bacteria. Trends Biotechnol 18:41–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amin NS, Boston MG, Bott RR, Cervin MA, Concar EM, Gustwiller ME, Jones BE, Liebeton K, Miracle GS, Oh H, Poulose AJ, Ramer SW, Scheibel JJ, Weyler W, Whited GM (2006) Perhydrolase. US Patent WO2005056782 (A2), C12n 9/00 ed. (EdWIPO), Genencor International, Inc. The Procter & Gamble CompanyGoogle Scholar
  3. Amitai G, Andersen J, Wargo S, Asche G, Chir J, Koepsel R, Russell AJ (2009) Polyurethane-based leukocyte-inspired biocidal materials. Biomaterials 30:6522–6529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amitai G, Murata H, Andersen JD, Koepsel RR, Russell AJ (2010) Decontamination of chemical and biological warfare agents with a single multi-functional material. Biomaterials 31:4417–4425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ansari SA, Husain Q (2012) Potential applications of enzymes immobilized on/in nano materials: a review. Biotech Advances 30:512–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Asuri P, Karajanagi SS, Sellitto E, Kim DY, Kane RS, Dordick JS (2006) Water-soluble carbon nanotube-enzyme conjugates as functional biocatalytic formulations. Biotechnol Bioeng 95:804–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Asuri P, Karajanagi SS, Vertegel AA, Dordick JS, Kane RS (2007) Enhanced stability of enzymes adsorbed onto nanoparticles. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 7:1675–1678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ayliffe G (2000) Decontamination of minimally invasive surgical endoscopes and accessories J Hospital Infection 45:263–277Google Scholar
  9. Ballard HS (1997) The hematological complications of alcoholism. Alcohol Health & Research World 21:42–52Google Scholar
  10. Barnett P, Hondmann DH, Simons LH, Ter Steeg PF, Wever R (1995) Enzymatic antimicrobial compositions. International Patent Application (PCT) WO 95/27046Google Scholar
  11. Bayramoglu G, Altintas B, Yilmaz M, Arica MY (2011) Immobilization of chloroperoxidase onto highly hydrophilic polyethylene chains via bio-conjugation: catalytic properties and stabilities. Bioresource Technol 102:475–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bernhardt P, Hult K, Kazlauskas RJ (2005) Molecular basis of perhydrolase activity in serine hydrolases. Angew Chem Int Ed 44:2742–2746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Borkar IV, Dinu CZ, Zhu G, Kane RS, Dordick JS (2010) Bionanoconjugate-based composites for decontamination of nerve agents. Biotechnol Prog 26:1622–1628Google Scholar
  14. Cabana H, Ahamed A, Leduc R (2011) Conjugation of laccase from the white rot fungus Trametes versicolor to chitosan and its utilization for the elimination of triclosan. Bioresource Technol 102:1656–1662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Corby MP (1995) Sporicidal disinfectant compositions, production and use thereof. US Patent 5,443,849AGoogle Scholar
  16. Dinu CZ, Borkar IV, Bale SS, Zhu G, Sanford K, Whited G, Kane RS, Dordick JS (2010a) Enzyme-nanotube-based composites used for chemical and biological decontamination. In: Cheng H, Gross R (eds) Green polymer chemistry: biocatalysis and biomaterials. ACS Symposium Series 1043:103-107Google Scholar
  17. Dinu CZ, Zhu G, Bale SS, Reeder PJ, Sanford K, Whited G, Kane RS, Dordick JS (2010b) Enzyme-based nanoscale composites for use as active decontamination surfaces. Adv Funct Mater 20:392–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dinu CZ, Dordick JS, Kane RS, Sanford K, Whited GM, Zhu G (2012a) Enzyme-based nanoscale decontaminating composites. US Patent PCT/US10/00104Google Scholar
  19. Dinu CZ, Borkar IV, Bale SS, Campbell AS, Kane RS, Dordick JS (2012b) Perhydrolase-nanotube-paint sporicidal composites stabilized by intramolecular crosslinking. J Mol Cat B 75:20–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dittmer NT, Suderman RJ, Jiang H, Zhu YC, Gorman MJ, Kramer KJ, Kanost MR (2004) Characterization of cDNAs encoding putative laccase-like multicopper oxidases and developmental expression in the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta, and the malaria mosquito, Anopheles gambiae. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 34:29–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fatemi P, Frank JF (1999) Inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes/Pseudomonas biofilms by peracid sanitizers. J Food Prot 62:761–765Google Scholar
  22. Fulmer PA, Wynne JH (2011) Development of broad-spectrum antimicrobial latex paint surfaces employing active amphiphilic compounds. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 3:2878–2884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Furtmüller PG, Burner U, Obinger C (1998) Reaction of myeloperoxidase compound I with chloride, bromide, iodide, and thiocyanate. Biochemistry 37:17923–17930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gagner JE, Lopez M, Dordick JS, Siegel JW (2011) Effect of gold nanoparticle morphology on adsorbed protein structure and function. Biomaterials 32:7241–7252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gianfreda L, Xu F, Bollag J-M (1999) Laccases: a useful group of oxidoreductive enzymes. Bioremediation J 3:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grover N, Borkar IV, Dinu CZ, Kane RS, Dordick JS (2012a) Laccase- and chloroperoxidase-nanotube paint composites with bactericidal and sporicidal activity. Enz Microb Technol 50:271–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grover N, Douaisi MP, Borkar IV, Lee L, Dinu CZ, Kane RS, Dordick JS (2012b) Perhydrolase-nanotube paint composites with sporicidal and antiviral activity. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. doi:10.1007/s00253-012-4573-3
  28. Hansen EH, Albertsen L, Schafer T, Johansen C, Frisvad JC, Molin S, Gram L (2003) Curvularia haloperoxidase: antimicrobial activity and potential application as a surface disinfectant. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:4611–4617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hasan Z, Renirie R, Kerkman R, Ruijssenaars HJ, Hartog AF, Wever R (2006) Laboratory-evolved vanadium chloroperoxidase exhibits 100-fold higher halogenating activity at alkaline pH. Catalytic effects from first and second coordination sphere mutations. J Biol Chem 281:9738–9744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Huang Q, Dawson RA, Pegg DE, Kearney JN, Macneil S (2004) Use of peracetic acid to sterilize human donor skin for production of acellular dermal matrices for clinical use. Wound Rep Reg 12:276–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Huang J, Liu C, Xiao H, Wang J, Jiang D, Erdan GU (2007) Zinc tetraaminophthalocyanine-Fe3O4 nanoparticle composite for laccase immobilization. Int J Nanomed 2:775–784Google Scholar
  32. Ibrahim NA, Gouda M, El-shafei AM, Abdel-Fatah OM (2007) Antimicrobial activity of cotton fabrics containing immobilized enzymes. J Appl Polym Sci 104:1754–1761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jacks TJ, De Lucca AJ, Morris NM (1999) Effects of chloroperoxidase and hydrogen peroxide on the viabilities of Aspergillus flavus conidiospores. Mol Cell Biochem 195:169–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jacks TJ, De Lucca AJ, Rajasekaran K, Stromberg K, van Pèe K-H (2000) Antifungal and peroxidative activities of nonheme chloroperoxidase in relation to transgenic plant protection. J Agric Food Chem 48:4561–4564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kanofsky JR (1984) Singlet oxygen production by chloroperoxidase-hydrogen peroxide-halide systems. J Biol Chem 259:5596–5600Google Scholar
  36. Kitis M (2004) Disinfection of wastewater with peracetic acid: a review. Environ Int 30:47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Klebanoff SJ (1967) Iodination of bacteria. A bactericidal mechanism. J Exp Medv 126:1063–1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Klebanoff SJ (1968) Myeloperoxidase-halide-hydrogen peroxide antibacterial system. J Bacteriol 95:2131–2138Google Scholar
  39. Klein E, Smith DL, Laxminarayan R (2007) Hospitalizations and deaths caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, United States, 1999–2005. Emerg Infect Dis 13:1840–1846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kulys J, Bratkovskaja I, Vidziunaite R (2005) Laccase-catalyzed iodide oxidation in presence of methyl syringate. Biotechnol Bioeng 92:124–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Li K, Xu F, Eriksson K-EL (1999) Comparison of fungal laccases and redox mediators in oxidation of a nonphenolic lignin model compound. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:2654–2660Google Scholar
  42. Littlechild J (1999) Haloperoxidases and their role in biotransformation reactions. Curr Opinion Chem Biol 3:28–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mathews I, Soltis M, Saldajeno M, Ganshaw G, Sala R, Weyler W, Cervin MA, Whited G, Bott R (2007) Structure of a novel enzyme that catalyzes acyl transfer to alcohols in aqueous conditions. Biochemistry 46:8969–8979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mayer AM, Staples RC (2002) Laccase: new functions for an old enzyme. Phytochemistry 60:551–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McDaniel SC, McDaniel J, Wales ME, Wild JR (2006) Enzyme-based additives for paints and coatings. Prog Org Coatings 55:182–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Messerschmidt A, Huber R (1990) The blue oxidases, ascorbate oxidase, laccase and ceruloplasmin, modeling and structural relationships. Eur J Biochem 187:341–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mikolasch A, Schauer F (2009) Fungal laccases as tools for the synthesis of new hybrid molecules and biomaterials. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 82:605–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Minussi RC, Pastore GM, Durán N (2002) Potential applications of laccase in the food industry. Trend Food Sci Technol 13:205–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Oestergaard HL, Christensen BE, Danielsen S (2008) Methods and compositions for killing spores. US Patent 0,286,256 A1Google Scholar
  50. Pangule RC, Brooks SJ, Dinu CZ, Bale SS, Salmon SL, Zhu G, Metzger GW, Kane RS, Dordick JS (2010) Antistaphylococcal nanocomposite films based on enzyme-nanotube conjugates. ACS Nano 4:3993–4000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Persoon IF, Hoogenkamp MA, Bury A, Wesselink PR, Hartog AF, Wever R, Crielaard W (2012) Effect of vanadium chloroperoxidase on Enterococcus faecalis biofilm. J Endod 38:72–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Piontek K, Antorini M, Choinowski T (2002) Crystal structure of a laccase from the fungus Trametes versicolor at 1.90-Å resolution containing a full complement of coppers. J Biol Chem 277:37663–37669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Renirie R, Dewilde A, Pierlot C, Wever R, Hober D, Aubry JM (2008) Bactericidal and virucidal activity of the alkalophilic P395D/L241 V/T343A mutant of vanadium chloroperoxidase. J Appl Microbiol 105:264–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sagripanti JL, Bonifacino A (1996) Comparative sporicidal effects of liquid chemical agents. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:545–551Google Scholar
  55. Sakurai T (1992) Anaerobic reactions of Rhus vernicifera laccase and its type-2 copper-depleted derivatives with hexacyanoferrate(II). Biochem J 284:681–685Google Scholar
  56. Shrivastava S, Nuffer JH, Siegel RW, Dordick JS (2012) Position-specific chemical modification and quantitative proteomics disclose protein orientation adsorbed on silica nanoparticles. Nano Lett 12:1583–1587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tennen R, Setlow B, Davis KL, Loshon CA, Setlow P (2000) Mechanisms of killing of spores of Bacillus subtilis by iodine, glutaraldehyde and nitrous acid. J Appl Microbiol 89:330–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tiller JC, Lee SB, Lewis K, Klibanov AM (2002) Polymer surfaces derivatized with poly(vinyl-N-hexyl pyridinium) kill airborne and water borne bacteria. Biotechnol Bioeng 79:465–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wever R, Dekker HL, Van Schijndel JWPM, Vollenbroek EGM (1995) Enzymatic antimicrobial compositions. Patent WO 95/27009Google Scholar
  60. Wood JP, Choi YW, Rogers JV, Kelly TJ, Riggs KB, Willenberg ZJ (2011) Efficacy of liquid spray decontaminants for inactivation of Bacillus anthracis spores on building and outdoor materials. J Appl Microbiol 110:1262–1273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Xu F (1996) Oxidation of phenols, anilines, and benzenethiols by fungal laccases: correlation between activity and redox potentials as well as halide inhibition. Biochem 35:7608–7614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Xu F, Shin W, Brown S, Wahleithner JA, Sundaram UM, Solomon EI (1996) A study of a series of recombinant fungal laccases and bilirubin oxidase that exhibit significant differences in redox potential, substrate specificity, and stability. Biochim Biophys Acta 1292:303–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Xu F, Kulys JJ, Duke K, Li K, Krikstopaitis K, Deussen H-JW, Abbate E, Galinyte V, Schneider P (2000) Redox chemistry in laccase-catalyzed oxidation of N-hydroxy compounds. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:2052–2056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yin, DeLu (Tyler), Kazlauskas RJ (2012) Revised molecular basis of the promiscuous carboxylic acid perhydrolase activity in serine hydrolases. Chem Eur J 18:8130-8139Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Navdeep Grover
    • 1
  • Cerasela Zoica Dinu
    • 2
  • Ravi S. Kane
    • 1
  • Jonathan S. Dordick
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Center for Biotechnology and Interdisciplinary StudiesRensselaer Polytechnic InstituteTroyUSA
  2. 2.Department of Chemical Engineering, Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral ResourcesWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA
  3. 3.Department of Chemical and Biological EngineeringRensselaer Polytechnic InstituteTroyUSA

Personalised recommendations