Skip to main content
Log in

Efficient methods for large-area surface sampling of sites contaminated with pathogenic microorganisms and other hazardous agents: current state, needs, and perspectives

  • Mini-Review
  • Published:
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The recovery operations following the 2001 attacks with Bacillus anthracis spores were complicated due to the unprecedented need for large-area surface sampling and decontamination protocols. Since this event, multiple reports have been published describing recovery efficiencies of several surface sampling materials. These materials include fibrous swabs of various compositions, cloth wipes, vacuum socks, and adhesive tapes. These materials have reported recovery efficiencies ranging from approximately 20% to 90% due to the many variations in their respective studies including sampling material, composition of surface sampled, concentration of contaminant, and even the method of deposition and sample processing. Additionally, the term recovery efficiency is crudely defined and could be better constructed to incorporate variations in contaminated surface composition and end user needs. While significant efforts in devising protocols for large-area surface sampling have been undertaken in the years since the anthrax attacks, there is still a general lack of consensus in optimal sampling materials and the methodology in which they are evaluated. Fortunately, sampling efforts are continuing to be supported, and the knowledge gaps in our procedures, methodology, and general understanding of sampling mechanisms are being investigated which will leave us better prepared for the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beecher DJ (2006) Forensic application of microbiological culture analysis to identify mail intentionally contaminated with Bacillus anthracis spores. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:5304–5310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown GS, Betty RG, Brockmann JE, Lucero DA, Souza CA, Walsh KS, Boucher RM, Tezak M, Wilson MC, Rudolph T, Lindquist HDA, Martinez KF (2007a) Evaluation of rayon swab surface sample collection method for Bacillus spores from nonporous surfaces. J Appl Microbiol 103:706–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown GS, Betty RG, Brockmann JE, Lucero DA, Souza CA, Walsh KS, Boucher RM, Tezak M, Wilson MC (2007b) Evaluation of vacuum filter sock surface sample collection method for Bacillus spores from porous and non-porous surfaces. J Environ Monit 9:666–671

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown GS, Betty RG, Brockmann JE, Lucero DA, Souza CA, Walsh KS, Boucher RM, Tezak M, Wilson MC, Rudolph T (2007c) Evaluation of a wipe surface sample method for collection of Bacillus spores from nonporous surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:706–710

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buttner MP, Cruz P, Stetzenbach LD, Klima-Comba AK, Stevens VL, Emanuel PA (2004) Evaluation of the Biological Sampling Kit (BiSkit) for large-area surface sampling. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:7040–7045

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds J, Collett PJ, Valdes ER, Skowronski EW, Pellar GJ, Emanuel PA (2009) Surface sampling of spores in dry-deposition aerosols. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:39–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frawley D, Samaan MN, Bull RL, Robertson JM, Mateczun AJ, Turnbull PC (2008) Recovery efficiencies of anthrax spores and ricin from nonporous or nonabsorbent and porous or absorbent surfaces by a variety of sampling methods. J Forensic Sci 53:1102–1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodges LR, Rose LJ, Peterson A, Noble-Wang J, Arduino MJ (2004) Evaluation of a macrofoam swab protocol for the recovery of Bacillus anthracis spores from a steel surface. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:4429–4430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jernigan D, Raghunathan PL, Bell BP, Brechner R, Bresnitz EA et al (2002) Investigation of bioterrorism-related anthrax, United States, 2001: epidemiologic findings. Emerg Infect Dis 8:1019–1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose L, Jensen B, Peterson A, Banerjee SN, Arduino MJ (2007) Swab materials and Bacillus anthracis spore recovery from nonporous surfaces. Emerg Infect Dis 10:1023–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson WT, Hein MJ, Taylor L, Curwin BD, Kinnes GM, Seitz TA, Popovic T, Holmes HT, Kellum ME, McAllister SK, Whaley DN, Tupin EA, Walker T, Freed JA, Small DS, Klusaritz B, Bridges JH (2002) Surface sampling methods for Bacillus anthracis spore contamination. Emerg Infect Dis 8:1145–1151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson WT, Stoddard RR, Echt AS, Piacitelli CA, Kim D, Horan J, Davies MM, McCleery RE, Muller P, Schnorr TM, Ward EM, Hales TR (2004) Bacillus anthracis contamination and inhalational anthrax in a mail processing and distribution center. J Appl Microbiol 96:9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi N, Ishidoshiro A, YoshidaY ST, Senda S, Nasu M (2002) Development of an adhesive sheet for direct counting of bacteria on solid surfaces. J Microbiol Methods 53:405–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason M. Edmonds.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Edmonds, J.M. Efficient methods for large-area surface sampling of sites contaminated with pathogenic microorganisms and other hazardous agents: current state, needs, and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 84, 811–816 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-2136-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-2136-z

Keywords

Navigation