Characterization of the anti-fungal activity of a Bacillus spp. associated with sclerotia from Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
- 308 Downloads
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum fruiting bodies (sclerotia) were found to harbour bacteria that possess anti-fungal activity. Among 1,140 bacterial isolates collected, 32 were found to inhibit the growth of four common fungal pathogens of canola, S. sclerotiorum, Rhizoctonia solani, Alternaria brassicae and Leptosphaeria maculans. One of these broad-spectrum isolates, LEV-006, was found to be closely related to Bacillus subtilis based on 16S rRNA analysis. The anti-fungal activities were purified and found to be associated with a low molecular weight peptide complex consisting mostly of the cyclic lipopeptide fengycin A and B, as revealed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight and post-source decay analysis, as well as two proteins of 20 and 55 kDa. Peptide mass fingerprinting revealed that the 55-kDa protein was similar to vegetative catalase 1; however, when the enzyme was expressed in Escherichia coli, it exhibited catalase but not anti-fungal activity. The sequences of several peptides from the 20-kDa protein were obtained and indicated that it was a unique anti-fungal protein.
KeywordsBacterial Isolate Biological Control Agent Surfactin Lipopeptides Rhizoctonia Solani
This work was supported by a grant from the Saskatchewan Agricultural Development Fund. We are also grateful to C. Matsalla, D. Baldwin, D. Sutherland and W. Taylor for their technical assistance and advice.
- Boyetchko SM (1999) Biological control agents of canola and rapeseed diseases—status and practical approaches. In: Mukerji KG, Chamola BP, Upadhyay K (eds) Biotechnological approaches in biocontrol of plant pathogens. Kluwer/Plenum, New York, pp 51–71Google Scholar
- Kloepper JW, Ryu CM, Zhang S (2004) Induced systemic resistance and promotion of plant growth by Bacillus spp. Phytopathology 94:1259–1265Google Scholar
- Mulligan CN, Gibbs BF (1990) Recovery of biosurfactants by ultrafiltration. J Chem Technol Biotech 47:23–29Google Scholar
- Perna NT, Plunkett G III, Burland V, Mau B, Glasner JD, Rose DJ, Mayhew GF, Evans PS, Gregor J, Kirkpatrick HA, Posfai G, Hackett J, Klink S, Boutin A, Shao Y, Miller L, Grotbeck EJ, Davis NW, Lim A, Dimalanta ET, Potamousis KD, Apodaca J, Anantharaman TS, Lin J, Yen G, Schwartz DC, Welch RA, Blattner FR (2001) Genome sequence of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. Nature 409:463–466CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Quail JW, Ismail N, Pedras MS, Boyetchko SM (2002) Pseudophomins A and B, a class of cyclic lipodepsipeptides isolated from a Pseudomonas species. Acta Crystallogr C58:o268–o271Google Scholar
- Sambrook J, Russell DW (2003) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 3rd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Sonenchein AL, Hoch JA, Losick R (2002) Bacillus subtilis and its closest relatives: from genes to cells. In: Sonenshein AL, Hoch JA, Losick R (eds) Bacillus subtilis and other gram-positive bacteria: biochemistry, physiology, and molecular genetics. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Souto GI, Correa OS, Montecchia MS, Kerber NL, Pucheu NL, Bachur M, García AF (2004) Genetic and functional characterization of a Bacillus sp. strain excreting surfactin and antifungal metabolites partially identified as iturin-like compounds. J Appl Microbiol 97:1247–1256CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tschen JSM, Kuo WL (1985) Antibiotic inhibition and control of Rhizoctonia solani by Bacillus subtilis. Plant Prot Bull 27:95–103Google Scholar
- Vater J, Kablitz B, Wilde C, Franke P, Mehta N, Cameotra SS (2002) Matrix assisted laser adsorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry of lipopeptide biosurfactants in whole cells and culture filtrates of Bacillus subtilis C-1 isolated from petroleum sludge. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:6210–6219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zuber P, Nakano NM, Mahariel MA (1993) Peptide antibiotics. In: Sonenshein AL, Hoch JA, Losick R (eds) Bacillus subtilis and other gram-positive bacteria: biochemistry, physiology, and molecular genetics. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC, pp 897–916Google Scholar