Advertisement

Induction of defense responses against Alternaria rot by different elicitors in harvested pear fruit

  • Shiping TianEmail author
  • Yakun Wan
  • Guozheng Qin
  • Yong Xu
Applied Microbial and Cell Physiology

Abstract

Pear fruit (Pyrus pyrifolia L. cv. Yali) treated by different elicitors, such as salicylic acid (SA), oxalic acid, calcium chloride, and antagonistic yeast Cryptococcus laurentii, were investigated to determine the induction of defense responses. The possible mechanism by which elicitors induced the resistance of pear fruit against postharvest disease was also evaluated. The results indicated that all the elicitors could significantly enhance defense-related enzyme activities, such as β-1,3-glucanase, phenylalanine ammonia lyase, peroxidase, and polyphenol oxidase activity, and reduce the disease incidence caused by Alternaria alternata in pear fruit (P=0.05). Among these different elicitors, SA treatment showed the best result in inducing the defense responses and reducing the decay in pear fruit.

Keywords

Salicylic Acid Oxalic Acid Phenylalanine Ammonia Lyase Salicylic Acid Treatment Alternaria Alternata 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of China (30225030) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30430480).

References

  1. Assis JS, Maldonado R, Munoz T, Escribano MI, Merodio C (2001) Effect of high carbon dioxide concentration on PAL activity and phenolic contents in ripening cherimoya fruit. Postharvest Biol Technol 23:33–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chance B, Maehly AC (1995) Assay of catalases and peroxidases. Methods Enzymol 2:764–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. De Capdeville G, Beer SV, Watkins CB, Wilson CL, Tedeschi LO, Aist JR (2003) Pre- and post-harvest harpin treatments of apples induce resistance to blue mold. Plant Dis 87:39–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Droby S, Chalutz E (1994) Mode of action of biocontrol agents of postharvest diseases. In: Wilson CL, Wisniewski ME (eds) Biological control of postharvest diseases—theory and practice. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 63–75Google Scholar
  6. Droby S, Vinokur V, Weiss B, Cohen L, Daus A, Goldschmidt EE, Porat R (2001) Induction of resistance to Penicillium digitatum by the yeast biocontrol agent Candida oleophila. Phytopathology 92:393–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. El-Ghaouth A, Wilson CL, Wisniewski M (1998) Ultrastructural and cytochemical aspect of the biocontrol activity of Candida saitoana in apple fruit. Phytopathology 88:282–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fajardo JE, McCollum TG, McDonald RE, Mayer RT (1998) Differential induction of proteins in orange flavedo by biologically based elicitors and challenged by Penicillium digitatum Sacc. Biol Control 13:143–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fan Q, Tian SP, Liu H, Xu Y (2002) Production of β-1,3-glucanase and chitinase of two biocontrol agents and their possible modes of action. Chin Sci Bull 47:292–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Friendrich L, Lawton K, Ruess W, Masner P, Specker N, Gut Rella M, Meier B, Dincher S, Staub S, Uknes S (1996) A benzothiadiazole derivative induces systemic acquired resistance in tobacco. Plant J 10:61–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hammerschmidt R, Nuckles EM, Kuc J (1982) Association of enhanced peroxidase activity with induced systemic resistance of cucumber to Colletotrichum lagenarium. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 20:73–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ippolito A, El-Ghaouth A, Wilson CL, Wisniewski M (2000) Control of postharvest decay of apple fruit by Aureobasidium pullulans and induction of defense responses. Postharvest Biol Technol 19:265–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jiang AL, Tian SP, Xu Y (2002) Effects of controlled atmospheres with high O2 or high CO2 concentrations on postharvest physiology and storability of “Napoleon” sweet cherry. Acta Bot Sin 44:925–930Google Scholar
  14. Kim YJ, Hwang BK (1997) Isolation of a basic 34-kilodalton β-1,3-glucanase with inhibitory activity against Phytophthora capsici from pepper stems. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 50:103–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Meena B, Marimuthu T, Velazhahan R (2001) Salicylic acid induces systemic resistance in groundnut against late leaf spot caused by Cercosporidium personatum. J Mycol Plant Pathol 31:139–145Google Scholar
  16. Murphy AM, Holcombe LJ, Carr JP (2000) Characteristics of salicylic acid induced delay in disease caused by a necrotrophic fungal pathogen in tobacco. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 57:47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Palva TK, Hurtig M, Saindrenan P, Palva ET (1994) Salicylic-acid induced resistance to Erwinia carotovora subsp. Carotovora in tobacco. Mol Plant-Microb Interact 7:356–363Google Scholar
  18. Pellegrini L, Rohfritsch O, Fritig B, Legrand M (1994) Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase in tobacco. Plant Physiol 106:877–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Petruzzelli L, Kunz C, Waldvogel R, Meins FJ, Leubner-Metzger G (1999) Distinct ethylene- and tissue-specific regulation of β-1,3-glucanases and chitinases during pea seed germination. Planta 209:195–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Qin GZ, Tian SP, Xu Y, Wan YK (2003) Enhancement of biocontrol efficacy of antagonistic yeasts by salicylic acid in sweet cherry fruit. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 62:147–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schneider S, Ullrich WR (1994) Differential induction of resistance and enhanced enzyme activities in cucumber and tobacco caused by treatment with various abiotic and biotic inducers. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 45:291–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sommer NF (1985) Role of controlled environmental in suppression of postharvest disease. Can J Plant Pathol 7:331–339Google Scholar
  23. Sticher L, Mauch-Mani B, Metraux JP (1997) Systemic acquired resistance. Annu Rev Phytopathol 35:235–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tian SP, Chan ZL (2004) Potential of induced resistance in postharvest disease control of fruits and vegetables. Acta Phytopathol Sin 34(5):385–394Google Scholar
  25. Tian SP, Fan Q, Xu Y, Jiang AL (2002a) Effects of calcium on biocontrol activity of yeast antagonists against the postharvest fungal pathogen Rhizopus stolonifer. Plant Pathol 51:352–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tian SP, Fan Q, Xu Y, Liu HB (2002b) Biocontrol efficacy of antagonist yeasts to grey mold and blue mold on apples and pears in controlled atmospheres. Plant Dis 86:848–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Van Loon LC, Bakker PA, Pieterse CM (1998) Systemic resistance induced by rhizophere bacteria. Annu Rev Phytopathol 36:453–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wilson CL, Wisniewski ME (1989) Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables: an emerging technology. Annu Rev Phytopathol 27:425–441Google Scholar
  29. Wisniewski M, Droby S, Chalutz E, Eilam Y (1995) Effects of Ca2+ and Mg2+ on Botrytis cinerea and Penecillium expansum in vitro and on the biocontrol activity of Candida oleophila. Plant Pathol 44:1016–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yoruk R, Marshall MR (2003) Physicochemical properties and function of plant polyphenol oxidase: a review. J Food Biochem 27:361–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shiping Tian
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yakun Wan
    • 1
  • Guozheng Qin
    • 1
  • Yong Xu
    • 1
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Photosynthesis and Environmental Molecular Physiology, Institute of BotanyThe Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations