Induction of defense responses against Alternaria rot by different elicitors in harvested pear fruit
- 740 Downloads
Pear fruit (Pyrus pyrifolia L. cv. Yali) treated by different elicitors, such as salicylic acid (SA), oxalic acid, calcium chloride, and antagonistic yeast Cryptococcus laurentii, were investigated to determine the induction of defense responses. The possible mechanism by which elicitors induced the resistance of pear fruit against postharvest disease was also evaluated. The results indicated that all the elicitors could significantly enhance defense-related enzyme activities, such as β-1,3-glucanase, phenylalanine ammonia lyase, peroxidase, and polyphenol oxidase activity, and reduce the disease incidence caused by Alternaria alternata in pear fruit (P=0.05). Among these different elicitors, SA treatment showed the best result in inducing the defense responses and reducing the decay in pear fruit.
KeywordsSalicylic Acid Oxalic Acid Phenylalanine Ammonia Lyase Salicylic Acid Treatment Alternaria Alternata
This work was supported by grants from the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of China (30225030) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30430480).
- Droby S, Chalutz E (1994) Mode of action of biocontrol agents of postharvest diseases. In: Wilson CL, Wisniewski ME (eds) Biological control of postharvest diseases—theory and practice. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 63–75Google Scholar
- Jiang AL, Tian SP, Xu Y (2002) Effects of controlled atmospheres with high O2 or high CO2 concentrations on postharvest physiology and storability of “Napoleon” sweet cherry. Acta Bot Sin 44:925–930Google Scholar
- Meena B, Marimuthu T, Velazhahan R (2001) Salicylic acid induces systemic resistance in groundnut against late leaf spot caused by Cercosporidium personatum. J Mycol Plant Pathol 31:139–145Google Scholar
- Palva TK, Hurtig M, Saindrenan P, Palva ET (1994) Salicylic-acid induced resistance to Erwinia carotovora subsp. Carotovora in tobacco. Mol Plant-Microb Interact 7:356–363Google Scholar
- Sommer NF (1985) Role of controlled environmental in suppression of postharvest disease. Can J Plant Pathol 7:331–339Google Scholar
- Tian SP, Chan ZL (2004) Potential of induced resistance in postharvest disease control of fruits and vegetables. Acta Phytopathol Sin 34(5):385–394Google Scholar
- Wilson CL, Wisniewski ME (1989) Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables: an emerging technology. Annu Rev Phytopathol 27:425–441Google Scholar