Advertisement

Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 68, Issue 2, pp 174–182 | Cite as

Bioconversion of lutein using a microbial mixture—maximizing the production of tobacco aroma compounds by manipulation of culture medium

  • Eduardo Rodríguez-Bustamante
  • Gabriela Maldonado-Robledo
  • Marco Antonio Ortiz
  • Carlos Díaz-Ávalos
  • Sergio SanchezEmail author
Biotechnological Products and Process Engineering

Abstract

The generation of aroma compounds by carotenoid cleavage in the 9–10 position was studied, due to the importance of these compounds in the flavor and fragrance industry. The bioconversion of the carotenoid lutein to C13 norisoprenoids utilizing a microbial mixture composed of Trichosporon asahii and Paenibacillus amylolyticus was carried out by a fermentation process. Applying an experimental design methodology, the effects of nutritional factors on the production of aroma compounds present in the tobacco profile were studied. After an assessment of the significance of each nutritional factor, the levels of the variables yielding the maximum response were calculated. Glucose, tryptone, and yeast extract exerted a strong negative effect over the objective function, with glucose being the strongest. Lutein possessed a positive effect over the tobacco aroma production, while sodium chloride and trace elements showed no influence over the process. The yield attained after culture medium manipulation was almost ten-fold higher, compared with the base medium; and the aroma mixture was characterized as: 7,8-dihydro-β-ionol (95.2%), 7,8-dihydro-β-ionone (3.7%), and β-ionone (1.1%).

Keywords

Carotenoid Lutein Astaxanthin Trichosporon Mass Spectral Library 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to Beatriz Ruiz and Laura Escalante for technical support in this work and to Elizabeth Langley and Romina Rodriguez-Sanoja for revising the manuscript. E.R.-B. is the recipient of a fellowship from the Dirección General de Estudios de Posgrado, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

References

  1. Armstrong DW, Brown LA, Porter S, Rutten R (1993) Biotechnological derivation of aromatic flavour compounds and precursors. In: Schreier P, Winterhalter P (eds) Progress in flavour precursor studies. Allured, Carol Stream, pp 425–438Google Scholar
  2. Bosser A, Paplorey E, Beling JM (1995) A simple way to (±)-dihydroactinidiolide from β-ionone related to enzymatic co-oxidation of β-carotene in aqueous solution. Biotechnol Prog 11:689–692Google Scholar
  3. Box GEP, Hunter WG, Hunter JS (1978) Statistics for experimenters. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Dasek J, Shepherd D, Traelnes RK (1973) Procéde de fabrication de zeaxanthine. Belgium patent 790289Google Scholar
  5. Krings U, Berger RG (1998) Biotechnological production of flavours and fragrances. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 49:1–8Google Scholar
  6. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin–phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Maldonado-Robledo G, Rodríguez-Bustamante E, Sánchez-Contreras A, Rodríguez-Sanoja R, Sanchez S (2003) Production of tobacco aroma from lutein. Specific role of the microorganisms involved in the process. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 62:484–488Google Scholar
  8. Masetto A, Flores Cotera L, Díaz C, Langley E, Sanchez S (2001) Application of a complete factorial design for the production of zeaxanthin by Flavobacterium sp. J Biosci Bioeng 92:55–58Google Scholar
  9. Montgomery DC (1997) Design and analysis of experiments. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. NIST/EPA/NIH (1992) Standard reference data program. National Institute of Standards and Technology, GaithesburgGoogle Scholar
  11. Parekh S, Vinci VA, Strobel RJ (2000) Improvement of microbial strains and fermentation processes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 54:287–301Google Scholar
  12. Rabenhorst J (2000) Biotechnological production of natural aroma chemicals by fermentation processes. In: Rehm HJ, Reed G (eds) Biotechnology. Wiley, Germany, pp 333–350Google Scholar
  13. Sánchez-Contreras A, Jiménez M, Sanchez S (2000) Bioconversion of lutein to products with aroma. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 54:528–534Google Scholar
  14. Somogyi PL (1996) The flavour and fragrance industry: serving a global market. Chem Ind 4:170–173Google Scholar
  15. Strobel RJ, Sullivan GR (1999) Experimental design for improvement of fermentations. In: Demain AL, Davies JE (eds) Manual of industrial microbiology and biotechnology. ASM, Washington, D.C., pp 80–93Google Scholar
  16. Winterhalter P (1996) Carotenoid-derived aroma compounds: biogenetic and biotechnological aspects. In: Takeoka GR, Teranishi R, Williams PJ, Kobayashi A (eds) Biotechnology for improved foods and flavors (ACS symposium series 637). American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C., pp 295–308Google Scholar
  17. Winterhalter P, Rouseff R (2002) Carotenoid-derived aroma compounds: an introduction. In: Winterhalter P, Rouseff R (eds) Carotenoid-derived aroma compounds (ACS symposium series 802). American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C., pp 1–19Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eduardo Rodríguez-Bustamante
    • 1
  • Gabriela Maldonado-Robledo
    • 1
  • Marco Antonio Ortiz
    • 1
  • Carlos Díaz-Ávalos
    • 2
  • Sergio Sanchez
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Departamento Biología Molecular y Biotecnología del Instituto de Investigaciones BiomédicasUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMéxicoMéxico
  2. 2.Instituto de Investigaciones en Matemáticas Aplicadas y SistemasUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMéxicoMéxico

Personalised recommendations