Abstract
Susceptibility to autoimmune diabetes is a complex genetic trait. Linkage analyses exploiting the NOD mouse, which spontaneously develops autoimmune diabetes, have proved to be a useful tool for the characterization of some of these traits. In a linkage analysis using 3A9 TCR transgenic mice on both B10.BR and NOD.H2k backgrounds, we previously determined that both the Idd2 and Idd13 loci were linked to the proportion of immunoregulatory CD4-CD8- double negative (DN) T cells. In addition to Idd2 and Idd13, five other loci showed weak linkage to the proportion of DN T cells. Of interest, in an interim analysis, a locus on chromosome 12 is linked to DN T cell proportion in both the spleen and the lymph nodes. To determine the impact of this locus on DN T cells, we generated two congenic sublines, which we named Chr12P and Chr12D for proximal and distal, respectively. While 3A9 TCR:insHEL NOD.H2k-Chr12D mice were protected from diabetes, 3A9 TCR:insHEL NOD.H2k-Chr12P showed an increase in diabetes incidence. Yet, the proportion of DN T cells was similar to the parental 3A9 TCR NOD.H2k strain for both of these congenic sublines. A genome-wide two dimensional LOD score analysis reveals genetic epistasis between chromosome 12 and the Idd13 locus. Altogether, this study identified further complex genetic interactions in defining the proportion of DN T cells, along with evidence of genetic epistasis within a locus on chromosome 12 influencing autoimmune susceptibility.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
References
Allen PM, Matsueda GR, Evans RJ, Dunbar JB Jr, Marshall GR, Unanue ER (1987) Identification of the T-cell and Ia contact residues of a T-cell antigenic epitope. Nature 327:713–5
Anderson MS, Bluestone JA (2005) THE NOD MOUSE: a model of immune dysregulation. Annu Rev Immunol 23:447–85
Carlborg O, Haley CS (2004) Epistasis: too often neglected in complex trait studies? Nat Rev Genet 5:618–25
Chen YG, Mathews CE, Driver JP (2018) The role of NOD mice in type 1 diabetes research: lessons from the past and recommendations for the future. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 9:51
Chen YG, Scheuplein F, Osborne MA, Tsaih SW, Chapman HD, Serreze DV (2008) Idd9/11 genetic locus regulates diabetogenic activity of CD4 T-cells in nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice. Diabetes 57:3273–80
Collin R, Doyon K, Mullins-Dansereau V, Karam M, Chabot-Roy G, Hillhouse EE, Orthwein A, Lesage S (2018) Genetic interaction between two insulin-dependent diabetes susceptibility loci, Idd2 and Idd13, in determining immunoregulatory DN T cell proportion. Immunogenetics 70:495–509
Collin R, Dugas V, Chabot-Roy G, Salem D, Zahn A, Di Noia JM, Rauch J, Lesage S (2015) Autoimmunity and antibody affinity maturation are modulated by genetic variants on mouse chromosome 12. J Autoimmun 58:90–9
Collin R, Dugas V, Pelletier AN, Chabot-Roy G, Lesage S (2014) The mouse Idd2 locus is linked to the proportion of immunoregulatory double-negative T cells, a trait associated with autoimmune diabetes resistance. J Immunol 193:3503–12
Driver JP, Serreze DV, Chen YG (2011) Mouse models for the study of autoimmune type 1 diabetes: a NOD to similarities and differences to human disease. Semin Immunopathol 33:67–87
Dugas V, Beauchamp C, Chabot-Roy G, Hillhouse EE, Lesage S (2010) Implication of the CD47 pathway in autoimmune diabetes. J Autoimmun 35:23–32
Dugas V, Liston A, Hillhouse EE, Collin R, Chabot-Roy G, Pelletier AN, Beauchamp C, Hardy K, Lesage S (2014) Idd13 is involved in determining immunoregulatory DN T-cell number in NOD mice. Genes Immun 15:82–7
Duncan B, Nazarov-Stoica C, Surls J, Kehl M, Bona C, Casares S, Brumeanu TD (2010) Double negative (CD3+ 4- 8-) TCR alphabeta splenic cells from young NOD mice provide long-lasting protection against type 1 diabetes. PLoS One 5:e11427
Esteban LM, Tsoutsman T, Jordan MA, Roach D, Poulton LD, Brooks A, Naidenko OV, Sidobre S, Godfrey DI, Baxter AG (2003) Genetic control of NKT cell numbers maps to major diabetes and lupus loci. J Immunol 171:2873–8
Esterhazy D, Canesso MCC, Mesin L, Muller PA, de Castro TBR, Lockhart A, ElJalby M, Faria AMC, Mucida D (2019) Compartmentalized gut lymph node drainage dictates adaptive immune responses. Nature 569:126–130
Farh KK, Marson A, Zhu J, Kleinewietfeld M, Housley WJ, Beik S, Shoresh N, Whitton H, Ryan RJ, Shishkin AA, Hatan M, Carrasco-Alfonso MJ, Mayer D, Luckey CJ, Patsopoulos NA, De Jager PL, Kuchroo VK, Epstein CB, Daly MJ, Hafler DA, Bernstein BE (2015) Genetic and epigenetic fine mapping of causal autoimmune disease variants. Nature 518:337–43
Ford MS, Chen W, Wong S, Li C, Vanama R, Elford AR, Asa SL, Ohashi PS, Zhang L (2007) Peptide-activated double-negative T cells can prevent autoimmune type-1 diabetes development. Eur J Immunol 37:2234–41
Fox CJ, Paterson AD, Mortin-Toth SM, Danska JS (2000) Two genetic loci regulate T cell-dependent islet inflammation and drive autoimmune diabetes pathogenesis. Am J Hum Genet 67:67–81
Hamilton-Williams EE, Bergot AS, Reeves PL, Steptoe RJ (2016) Maintenance of peripheral tolerance to islet antigens. J Autoimmun 72:118–25
Hamilton-Williams EE, Rainbow DB, Cheung J, Christensen M, Lyons PA, Peterson LB, Steward CA, Sherman LA, Wicker LS (2013) Fine mapping of type 1 diabetes regions Idd9.1 and Idd9.2 reveals genetic complexity. Mamm Genome 24:358–75
Hill NJ, Lyons PA, Armitage N, Todd JA, Wicker LS, Peterson LB (2000) NOD Idd5 locus controls insulitis and diabetes and overlaps the orthologous CTLA4/IDDM12 and NRAMP1 loci in humans. Diabetes 49:1744–7
Hillhouse EE, Beauchamp C, Chabot-Roy G, Dugas V, Lesage S (2010) Interleukin-10 limits the expansion of immunoregulatory CD4-CD8- T cells in autoimmune-prone non-obese diabetic mice. Immunol Cell Biol 88:771–80
Hillhouse EE, Delisle JS, Lesage S (2013) Immunoregulatory CD4(-)CD8(-) T cells as a potential therapeutic tool for transplantation, autoimmunity, and cancer. Front Immunol 4:6
Hillhouse EE, Lesage S (2013) A comprehensive review of the phenotype and function of antigen-specific immunoregulatory double negative T cells. J Autoimmun 40:58–65
Hillhouse EE, Liston A, Collin R, Desautels E, Goodnow CC, Lesage S (2016) TCR transgenic mice reveal the impact of type 1 diabetes loci on early and late disease checkpoints. Immunol Cell Biol 94:709–13
Hollis-Moffatt JE, Hook SM, Merriman TR (2005) Colocalization of mouse autoimmune diabetes loci Idd21.1 and Idd21.2 with IDDM6 (human) and Iddm3 (rat). Diabetes 54:2820–5
Hunter K, Rainbow D, Plagnol V, Todd JA, Peterson LB, Wicker LS (2007) Interactions between Idd5.1/Ctla4 and Other Type 1 Diabetes Genes. J Immunol 179:8341–9
Juvet SC, Zhang L (2012) Double negative regulatory T cells in transplantation and autoimmunity: recent progress and future directions. J Mol Cell Biol 4:48–58
Kachapati K, Adams DE, Wu Y, Steward CA, Rainbow DB, Wicker LS, Mittler RS, Ridgway WM (2012) The B10 Idd9.3 locus mediates accumulation of functionally superior CD137(+) regulatory T cells in the nonobese diabetic type 1 diabetes model. J Immunol 189:5001–15
Keller MP, Rabaglia ME, Schueler KL, Stapleton DS, Gatti DM, Vincent M, Mitok KA, Wang Z, Ishimura T, Simonett SP, Emfinger CH, Das R, Beck T, Kendziorski C, Broman KW, Yandell BS, Churchill GA, Attie AD (2019) Gene loci associated with insulin secretion in islets from non-diabetic mice. J Clin Invest 130:4419–4432
Lesage S, Hartley SB, Akkaraju S, Wilson J, Townsend M, Goodnow CC (2002) Failure to censor forbidden clones of CD4 T cells in autoimmune diabetes. J Exp Med 196:1175–88
Liston A, Lesage S, Gray DH, O’Reilly LA, Strasser A, Fahrer AM, Boyd RL, Wilson J, Baxter AG, Gallo EM, Crabtree GR, Peng K, Wilson SR, Goodnow CC (2004) Generalized resistance to thymic deletion in the NOD mouse: a polygenic trait characterized by defective induction of Bim. Immunity 21:817–30
Liu T, Cong M, Sun G, Wang P, Tian Y, Shi W, Li X, You H, Zhang D (2016) Combination of double negative T cells and anti-thymocyte serum reverses type 1 diabetes in NOD mice. J Transl Med 14:57
Maier LM, Wicker LS (2005) Genetic susceptibility to type 1 diabetes. Curr Opin Immunol 17:601–8
Martina MN, Noel S, Saxena A, Rabb H, Hamad AR (2015) Double Negative (DN) alphabeta T Cells: misperception and overdue recognition. Immunol Cell Biol 93:305–310
Morin J, Boitard C, Vallois D, Avner P, Rogner UC (2006) Mapping of the murine type 1 diabetes locus Idd20 by genetic interaction. Mamm Genome 17:1105–12
Mullen Y (2017) Development of the nonobese diabetic mouse and contribution of animal models for understanding type 1 diabetes. Pancreas 46:455–466
Orban T, Sosenko JM, Cuthbertson D, Krischer JP, Skyler JS, Jackson R, Yu L, Palmer JP, Schatz D, Eisenbarth G, Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1 Study G (2009) Pancreatic islet autoantibodies as predictors of type 1 diabetes in the Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1. Diabetes Care 32:2269–2274
Podolin PL, Pressey A, DeLarato NH, Fischer PA, Peterson LB, Wicker LS (1993) I-E+ nonobese diabetic mice develop insulitis and diabetes. J Exp Med 178:793–803
Polychronakos C, Li Q (2011) Understanding type 1 diabetes through genetics: advances and prospects. Nat Rev Genet 12:781–92
Ridgway WM, Peterson LB, Todd JA, Rainbow DB, Healy B, Burren OS, Wicker LS (2008) Gene-gene interactions in the NOD mouse model of type 1 diabetes. Adv Immunol 100:151–75
Rigby RJ, Rozzo SJ, Boyle JJ, Lewis M, Kotzin BL, Vyse TJ (2004) New loci from New Zealand Black and New Zealand White mice on chromosomes 4 and 12 contribute to lupus-like disease in the context of BALB/c. J Immunol 172:4609–17
Rogner UC, Boitard C, Morin J, Melanitou E, Avner P (2001) Three loci on mouse chromosome 6 influence onset and final incidence of type I diabetes in NOD.C3H congenic strains. Genomics 74:163–71
Sgouroudis E, Albanese A, Piccirillo CA (2008) Impact of protective IL-2 allelic variants on CD4+ Foxp3+ regulatory T cell function in situ and resistance to autoimmune diabetes in NOD mice. J Immunol 181:6283–92
Silva DG, Daley SR, Hogan J, Lee SK, Teh CE, Hu DY, Lam KP, Goodnow CC, Vinuesa CG (2011) Anti-islet autoantibodies trigger autoimmune diabetes in the presence of an increased frequency of islet-reactive CD4 T cells. Diabetes 60:2102–11
Steck AK, Johnson K, Barriga KJ, Miao D, Yu L, Hutton JC, Eisenbarth GS, Rewers MJ (2011) Age of islet autoantibody appearance and mean levels of insulin, but not GAD or IA-2 autoantibodies, predict age of diagnosis of type 1 diabetes: diabetes autoimmunity study in the young. Diabetes Care 34:1397–9
Tellier J, van Meerwijk JP, Romagnoli P (2006) An MHC-linked locus modulates thymic differentiation of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T lymphocytes. Int Immunol 18:1509–19
Theofilopoulos AN, Kono DH, Baccala R (2017) The multiple pathways to autoimmunity. Nat Immunol 18:716–724
Thomson CA, McCoy KD (2019) Not all lymph nodes are created equal. Immunity 51:12–14
Tsaih SW, Khaja S, Ciecko AE, MacKinney E, Chen YG (2013) Genetic control of murine invariant natural killer T cells maps to multiple type 1 diabetes regions. Genes Immun 14:380–6
Wang N, Elso CM, Mackin L, Mannering SI, Strugnell RA, Wijburg OL, Brodnicki TC (2014) Congenic mice reveal genetic epistasis and overlapping disease loci for autoimmune diabetes and listeriosis. Immunogenetics 66:501–6
Wicker LS, Todd JA, Peterson LB (1995) Genetic control of autoimmune diabetes in the NOD mouse. Annu Rev Immunol 13:179–200
Yamanouchi J, Rainbow D, Serra P, Howlett S, Hunter K, Garner VE, Gonzalez-Munoz A, Clark J, Veijola R, Cubbon R, Chen SL, Rosa R, Cumiskey AM, Serreze DV, Gregory S, Rogers J, Lyons PA, Healy B, Smink LJ, Todd JA, Peterson LB, Wicker LS, Santamaria P (2007) Interleukin-2 gene variation impairs regulatory T cell function and causes autoimmunity. Nat Genet 39:329–37
Zhang D, Zhang W, Ng TW, Wang Y, Liu Q, Gorantla V, Lakkis F, Zheng XX (2011) Adoptive cell therapy using antigen-specific CD4-CD8- T regulatory cells to prevent autoimmune diabetes and promote islet allograft survival in NOD mice. Diabetologia 54:2082–92
Ziegler AG, Rewers M, Simell O, Simell T, Lempainen J, Steck A, Winkler C, Ilonen J, Veijola R, Knip M, Bonifacio E, Eisenbarth GS (2013) Seroconversion to multiple islet autoantibodies and risk of progression to diabetes in children. JAMA 309:2473–9
Acknowledgements
We thank all of the animal house staff for aid in maintaining the mouse colonies used in this study.
Funding
This work was supported by the Canadian Diabetes Association (Grant OG-3-13-4018) and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Grant PJT 159603) to SL. RC and ANP received scholarships from Diabète Québec and l’Université de Montréal. RC and VD received scholarships from the Fonds de recherche Québec-Santé. SL is a Research Scholars Emeritus from the Fonds de recherche Québec -Santé.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
RC acquired data, analyzed data, participated in the elaboration of the experimental plan, prepared the figures, and corrected and approved the manuscript. VD acquired data, generated the congenic mice, participated in the elaboration of the experimental plan, and corrected and approved the manuscript. ANP acquired data, analyzed data, participated in the elaboration of the experimental plan, and corrected and approved the manuscript. GCR acquired data and corrected and approved the manuscript. SL participated in the elaboration of the experimental plan, supervised the study, and wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
The Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital ethics committee, overseen by the Canadian Council for Animal Protection, approved the experimental procedures.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Collin, R., Dugas, V., Pelletier, AN. et al. Evidence of genetic epistasis in autoimmune diabetes susceptibility revealed by mouse congenic sublines. Immunogenetics 73, 307–319 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00251-021-01214-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00251-021-01214-9