Abstract
Human ErbB family of proteins contains four receptor tyrosine kinases (EGFR, Her2, Her3 and Her4) and has been established as a group of attractive druggable targets against diverse cancers. Over the past decades, a variety of ATP-competitive inhibitors have been discovered to target the orthosteric site of EGFR, which, however, would eventually develop acquired drug resistance due to the missense mutations T790M/C797S occurring in orthosteric site. In recent years, a number of forth-generation inhibitors have been successfully designed to overcome the T790M/C797S-induced drug resistance by targeting EGFR allosteric site instead of orthosteric site. Considering that the four proto-oncogenic ErbB kinases share a high conservation in sequence, structure and function, we herein attempted to investigate the binding potency and cross-reactivity of cognate EGFR allosteric inhibitors over noncognate Her2, Her3 and Her4 kinases––they are closely related to gynecological tumors such as ovarian cancer but no allosteric inhibitors have been reported specifically for them to date. A systematic affinity profile of 12 allosteric inhibitors and 4 orthosteric inhibitors to the 4 ErbB kinases was created by integrating dynamics simulations, energetics calculations and biochemical assays, which was then used to derive a systematic inhibitor selectivity profile for EGFR over other three kinases. It is found that allosteric and orthosteric inhibitors exhibit moderate and modest cross-reactivity across the ErbB family, respectively, but the former generally has a higher binding potency than the latter due to the additional energy cost used for inducing kinase conformational change. Moreover, most allosteric inhibitors can be sensitized by Her2 T798M gatekeeper mutation, a counterpart of EGFR T790M gatekeeper mutation that has been previously reported to cause generic drug resistance for orthosteric inhibitors.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdelbaset MS, Abdel-Aziz M, Ramadan M, Abdelrahman MH, Abbas Bukhari SN, Ali TFS, Abuo-Rahma GEA (2019) Discovery of novel thienoquinoline-2-carboxamide chalcone derivatives as antiproliferative EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem 27:1076–1086
Ai X, Sun Y, Wang H, Lu S (2014) A systematic profile of clinical inhibitors responsive to EGFR somatic amino acid mutations in lung cancer: implication for the molecular mechanism of drug resistance and sensitivity. Amino Acids 46:1635–1648
Bai Z, Hou S, Zhang S, Li Z, Zhou P (2017) Targeting self-binding peptides as a novel strategy to regulate protein activity and function: a case study on the proto-oncogene tyrosine protein kinase c-Src. J Chem Inf Model 57:835–845
Bayly CI, Cieplak P, Cornell WD, Kollman PA (1993) A well-behaved electrostatic potential based method using charge restraints for deriving atomic charges: the RESP model. J Phys Chem 97:10269–10280
Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE (2000) The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 28:235–242
Chung YW, Kim S, Hong JH, Lee JK, Lee NW, Lee YS, Song JY (2019) Overexpression of HER2/HER3 and clinical feature of ovarian cancer. J Gynecol Oncol 30:e75
Cui YH, Chen J, Xu T, Tian HL (2015) Structure-based grafting and identification of kinase-inhibitors to target mTOR signaling pathway as potential therapeutics for glioblastoma. Comput Biol Chem 54:57–65
Darden T, York D, Pedersen L (1993) Particale mesh Ewald and N.log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J Chem Phys 98:10089–10092
Forli S, Huey R, Pique ME, Sanner MF, Goodsell DS, Olson AJ (2016) Computational protein-ligand docking and virtual drug screening with the AutoDock suite. Nat Protoc 11:905–919
Genheden S, Ryde U (2010) How to obtain statistically converged MM/GBSA results. J Comput Chem 31:837–846
Genheden S, Ryde U (2015) The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities. Expert Opin Drug Discov 10:449–461
Ghorban DL, Madadkar SA, Shafiei A, Mahmoudian M (2004) Flexible ligand docking studies of matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors using Lamarckian genetic algorithm. Daru J Pharm Sci 12:1–10
Hamilton EP, Patel MR, Rodon J, Hong DS (2020) Masterkey-01: Phase I/II, open-label multicenter study to assess safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of BDTX-189, an inhibitor of allosteric ErbB mutations, in patients with advanced solid malignancies. J Clin Oncol 38:TPS3665
He X, Hao Y, Liu X, Guan J, Wang L (2021) Noncognate sensitivity to cognate EGFR allosteric inhibitors at molecular level: new uses for old drugs in gynecological tumors. J Chin Chem Soc 69:1–10
Hou T, Yu R (2007) Molecular dynamics and free energy studies on the wild-type and double mutant HIV-1 protease complexed with amprenavir and two amprenavir-related inhibitors: mechanism for binding and drug resistance. J Med Chem 50:1177–1188
Hou T, McLaughlin WA, Wang W (2008) Evaluating the potency of HIV-1 protease drugs to combat resistance. Proteins 71:1163–1174
Izadi S, Harris RC, Fenley MO, Onufriev AV (2018) Accuracy comparison of generalized Born models in the calculation of electrostatic binding free energies. J Chem Theory Comput 14:1656–1670
Jänne PA (2008) Challenges of detecting EGFR T790M in gefitinib/erlotinib-resistant tumors. Lung Cancer 60:S3–S9
Jia Y, Yun CH, Park E, Ercan D, Manuia M, Juarez J, Xu C, Rhee K, Chen T, Zhang H, Palakurthi S, Jang J, Lelais G, DiDonato M, Bursulaya B, Michellys PY, Epple R, Marsilje TH, McNeill M, Lu W, Harris J, Bender S, Wong KK, Jänne PA, Eck MJ (2016) Overcoming EGFR(T790M) and EGFR(C797S) resistance with mutant-selective allosteric inhibitors. Nature 534:129–132
Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML (1983) Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 79:926–935
Kelley LA, Gardner SP, Sutcliffe MJ (1996) An automated approach for clustering an ensemble of NMR-derived protein structures into conformationally related subfamilies. Protein Eng 9:1063–1065
Kong LL, Ma R, Yao MY, Yan XE, Zhu SJ, Zhao P, Yun CH (2017) Structural pharmacological studies on EGFR T790M/C797S. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 488:266–272
Landi L, Cappuzzo F (2013) Irreversible EGFR-TKIs: dreaming perfection. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2:40–49
Li M, Guo J (2021) Deciphering the T790M/L858R-selective inhibition mechanism of an allosteric inhibitor of EGFR: insights from molecular simulations. ACS Chem Neurosci 12:462–472
Li Z, Yan F, Miao Q, Meng Y, Wen L, Jiang Q, Zhou P (2019a) Self-binding peptides: binding-upon-folding versus folding-upon-binding. J Theor Biol 469:25–34
Li Z, Miao Q, Yan F, Meng Y, Zhou P (2019b) Machine learning in quantitative protein–peptide affinity prediction: implications for therapeutic peptide design. Curr Drug Metab 20:170–176
Ma C, Wei S, Song Y (2011) T790M and acquired resistance of EGFR TKI: a literature review of clinical reports. J Thorac Dis 3:10–18
Madeswaran A, Asokkumar K (2015) Evaluation of inhibitory affinity potential of the alkaloids against crystal structure of human angiotensin-converting enzyme using Lamarckian genetic algorithm. Orient Pharm Exp Med 15:183–189
Maier JA, Martinez C, Kasavajhala K, Wickstrom L, Hauser KE, Simmerling C (2015) ff14SB: improving the accuracy of protein side chain and backbone parameters from ff99SB. J Chem Theory Comput 11:3696–3713
Meher BR, Wang Y (2012) Interaction of I50V mutant and I50L/A71V double mutant HIV-protease with inhibitor TMC114 (darunavir): molecular dynamics simulation and binding free energy studies. J Phys Chem B 116:1884–1900
Meng X, Li Y, Tang H, Mao W, Yang H, Wang X, Ding X, Xie S (2016) Drug response to HER2 gatekeeper T798M mutation in HER2-positive breast cancer. Amino Acids 48:487–497
Miller BR, McGee TD, Swails JM, Homeyer N, Gohlke H, Roitberg AE (2012) MMPBSA.py: an efficient program for end-state free energy calculations. J Chem Theory Comput 8:3314–3321
Morris GM, Goodsell DS, Halliday RS, Huey R, Hart WE, Belew RK, Olson AJ (1998) Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. J Comput Chem 19:1639–1662
Morris GM, Huey R, Lindstrom W, Sanner MF, Belew RK, Goodsell DS, Olson AJ (2009) AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J Comput Chem 30:2785–2791
Ni D, Li Y, Qiu Y, Pu J, Lu S, Zhang J (2020) Combining allosteric and orthosteric drugs to overcome drug resistance. Trends Pharmacol Sci 41:336–348
Ning X, Ren X, Xie X, Yan P, Wang D, Huang X (2020) A caffeic acid phenethyl ester analog inhibits the proliferation of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells via targeting epidermal growth factor receptor. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 34:e22491
Palmieri L, Rastelli G (2013) αC helix displacement as a general approach for allosteric modulation of protein kinases. Drug Discov Today 18:407–414
Peng YH, Shiao HY, Tu CH, Liu PM, Hsu JT, Amancha PK, Wu JS, Coumar MS, Chen CH, Wang SY, Lin WH, Sun HY, Chao YS, Lyu PC, Hsieh HP, Wu SY (2013) Protein kinase inhibitor design by targeting the Asp-Phe-Gly (DFG) motif: the role of the DFG motif in the design of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors. J Med Chem 56:3889–3903
Puigserver P (2018) Signaling transduction and metabolomics. Hematology 7:68–78
Robert X, Gouet P (2014) Deciphering key features in protein structures with the new ENDscript server. Nucleic Acids Res 42:W320–W324
Roskoski R (2019) Small molecule inhibitors targeting the EGFR/ErbB family of protein-tyrosine kinases in human cancers. Pharmacol Res 139:395–411
Ryckaert JP, Ciccotti G, Berendsen HJC (1977) Numerical integration of the cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J Comput Phys 23:327–341
Salentin S, Schreiber S, Haupt VJ, Adasme MF, Schroeder M (2015) PLIP: fully automated protein-ligand interaction profiler. Nucleic Acids Res 4:W443–W447
Santos EDS, Nogueira KAB, Fernandes LCC, Martins JRP, Reis AVF, Neto JBV, Júnior IJDS, Pessoa C, Petrilli R, Eloy JO (2021) EGFR targeting for cancer therapy: Pharmacology and immunoconjugates with drugs and nanoparticles. Int J Pharm 592:120082
Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D, Gibson TJ, Karplus K, Li W, Lopez R, McWilliam H, Remmert M, Söding J, Thompson JD, Higgins DG (2011) Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol 7:539
Stamos J, Sliwkowski MX, Eigenbrot C (2002) Structure of the epidermal growth factor receptor kinase domain alone and in complex with a 4-anilinoquinazoline inhibitor. J Biol Chem 277:46265–46272
Steffensen KD, Waldstrøm M, Andersen RF, Olsen DA, Jeppesen U, Knudsen HJ, Brandslund I, Jakobsen A (2008) Protein levels and gene expressions of the epidermal growth factor receptors, Her1, Her2, Her3 and Her4 in benign and malignant ovarian tumors. Int J Oncol 33:195–204
Sun H, Duan L, Chen F, Liu H, Wang Z, Pan P, Zhu F, Zhang JZH, Hou T (2018) Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 7. Entropy effects on the performance of end-point binding free energy calculation approaches. Phys Chem Chem Phys 20:14450–14460
Tripathi SK, Biswal BK (2021) Allosteric mutant-selective fourth-generation EGFR inhibitors as an efficient combination therapeutic in the treatment of non-small cell lung carcinoma. Drug Discov Today 26:1466–1472
UniProt C (2017) UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res 45:D158–D169
Wan S, Yan R, Jiang Y, Li Z, Zhang J, Wu X (2019) Insight into binding mechanisms of EGFR allosteric inhibitors using molecular dynamics simulations and free energy calculations. J Biomol Struct Dyn 37:4384–4394
Wang J, Wang W, Huo S, Lee M, Kollman PA (2001) Solvation model based on weighted solvent accessible surface area. J Phys Chem B 105:5055–5067
Wang J, Wolf RM, Caldwell JW, Kollman PA, Case DA (2004) Development and testing of a general amber force field. J Comput Chem 25:1157–1174
Wang S, Song Y, Liu D (2017) EAI045: The fourth-generation EGFR inhibitor overcoming T790M and C797S resistance. Cancer Lett 385:51–54
Waterhouse A, Bertoni M, Bienert S, Studer G, Tauriello G, Gumienny R, Heer FT, de Beer TAP, Rempfer C, Bordoli L, Lepore R, Schwede T (2018) SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res 46:W296–W303
Wu SG, Shih JY (2018) Management of acquired resistance to EGFR TKI-targeted therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Mol Cancer 17:38
Xu G, Abad MC, Connolly PJ, Neeper MP, Struble GT, Springer BA, Emanuel SL, Pandey N, Gruninger RH, Adams M, Moreno-Mazza S, Fuentes-Pesquera AR, Middleton SA (2008) 4-Amino-6-arylamino-pyrimidine-5-carbaldehyde hydrazones as potent ErbB-2/EGFR dual kinase inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 18:4615–4619
Yoshizawa T, Uchibori K, Araki M, Matsumoto S, Ma B, Kanada R, Seto Y, Oh-Hara T, Koike S, Ariyasu R, Kitazono S, Ninomiya H, Takeuchi K, Yanagitani N, Takagi S, Kishi K, Fujita N, Okuno Y, Nishio M, Katayama R (2021) Microsecond-timescale MD simulation of EGFR minor mutation predicts the structural flexibility of EGFR kinase core that reflects EGFR inhibitor sensitivity. NPJ Precis Oncol 5:32
Yu H, Zhou P, Deng M, Shang Z (2014) Indirect readout in protein–peptide recognition: a different story from classical biomolecular recognition. J Chem Inf Model 54:2022–2032
Yun CH, Mengwasser KE, Toms AV, Woo MS, Greulich H, Wong KK, Meyerson M, Eck MJ (2008) The T790M mutation in EGFR kinase causes drug resistance by increasing the affinity for ATP. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:2070–2075
Zhang Q, Jing T, Cui X, Zhao L (2020) Rational molecular profiling of receptor-associated late transducer peptide selectivity across Her/Rtk kinases. Int J Pept Res Ther 27:1945–1951
Zhang D, Wu H, Zhao J (2021) Computational design and experimental substantiation of conformationally constrained peptides from the complex interfaces of transcriptional enhanced associate domains with their cofactors in gastric cancer. Comput Biol Chem 94:107569
Zhao Y, Jiao Y, Sun F, Liu X (2018) Revisiting the molecular mechanism of acquired resistance to reversible tyrosine kinase inhibitors caused by EGFR gatekeeper T790M mutation in non-small-cell lung cancer. Med Chem Res 27:2160–2170
Zhao Y, Zhu D, Gao J (2021) Molecular analysis and systematic profiling of allosteric inhibitor response to clinically significant epidermal growth factor receptor missense mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. J Chin Chem Soc 68:2021–2034
Zhou P, Miao Q, Yan F, Li Z, Jiang Q, Wen L, Meng Y (2019) Is protein context responsible for peptide-mediated interactions? Mol Omics 15:280–295
Zhou P, Yan F, Miao Q, Chen Z, Wang H (2021a) Why the first self-binding peptide of human c-Src kinase does not contain class II motif but can bind to its cognate Src homology 3 domain in class II mode? J Biomol Struct Dyn 39:310–318
Zhou P, Wang H, Chen Z, Liu Q (2021b) Context contribution to the intermolecular recognition of human ACE2-derived peptides by SARS-CoV-2 spike protein: implications for improving the peptide affinity but not altering the peptide specificity by optimizing indirect readout. Mol Omics 17:86–94
Zhou P, Liu Q, Wu T, Miao Q, Shang S, Wang H, Chen Z, Wang S, Wang H (2021c) Systematic comparison and comprehensive evaluation of 80 amino acid descriptors in peptide QSAR modeling. J Chem Inf Model 61:1718–1731
Zhu SJ, Zhao P, Yang J, Ma R, Yan XE, Yang SY, Yang JW, Yun CH (2018) Structural insights into drug development strategy targeting EGFR T790M/C797S. Oncotarget 9:13652–13665
Zuo X, Zhao H, Li D (2021) Systematic inhibitor selectivity between PARP1 and PARP2 enzymes: molecular implications for ovarian cancer personalized therapy. J Mol Recog 34:e2891
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the CCH foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ma, Y., Qi, B., Ning, M. et al. Systematic analysis and molecular profiling of EGFR allosteric inhibitor cross-reactivity across the proto-oncogenic ErbB family kinases by integrating dynamics simulation, energetics calculation and biochemical assay. Eur Biophys J 51, 283–295 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-022-01594-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-022-01594-0