Advertisement

European Biophysics Journal

, Volume 43, Issue 8–9, pp 433–443 | Cite as

Intermediates in the folding equilibrium of repeat proteins from the TPR family

  • Vicente González-Charro
  • Antonio ReyEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

In recent decades, advances in computational methods and experimental biophysical techniques have improved our understanding of protein folding. Although some of these advances have been remarkable, the structural variability of globular proteins usually encountered makes it difficult to extract general features of their folding processes. To overcome this difficulty, experimental and computational studies of the folding of repeat (or modular) proteins are of interest. Because their native structures can be described as linear arrays of the same, repeated, supersecondary structure unit, it is possible to seek  a possibly independent behavior of the different modules without taking into account the intrinsic stability associated with different secondary structure motifs. In this work we have used a Monte Carlo-based simulation to study the folding equilibrium of four repeat proteins belonging to the tetratricopeptide repeat family. Our studies provide new insights into their energy profiles, enabling investigation about the existence of intermediate states and their relative stabilities. We have also performed structural analyses to describe the structure of these intermediates, going through the vast number of conformations obtained from the simulations. In this way, we have tried to identify the regions of each protein in which the modular structure yields a different behavior and, more specifically, regions of the proteins that can stay folded when the rest of the chain has been thermally denatured.

Keywords

Molecular modeling Protein folding Coarse graining Monte Carlo Structure-based interactions 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (grant no. FIS2009-13364-C02-02), and by Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid (grant no. S2009/PPQ-1551). VGC acknowledges a stipend from Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid. AR wishes to acknowledge Dr A.L. Cortajarena for her advice about the PDB files.

References

  1. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE (2000) The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 28:235–242PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Clarke DT (2012) Circular dichroism in protein folding studies. Curr Protoc Protein Sci 70:28.3.1–28.3.17Google Scholar
  3. Cortajarena AL, Mochrie S, Regan L (2008) Mapping the energy landscape of repeat proteins using NMR-detected hydrogen exchange. J Mol Biol 379:617–626PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cortajarena AL, Regan L (2011) Calorimetric study of a series of designed repeat proteins: modular structure and modular folding. Protein Sci 20:336–340PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dill KA, Ozkan SB, Weikl TR, Chodera JD, Voelz VA (2007) The protein folding problem: when will it be solved? Curr Opin Struct Biol 17:342–346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Estácio SG, Krobath H, Vila-Viçosa D, Machuqueiro M, Shakhnovich EI, Faísca PFN (2014) A simulated intermediate state for folding and aggregation provides insights into \(\Delta\)N6 \(\beta _2\)-microglobulin amyloidogenic behavior. PLoS Comput Biol 10(e1003606):1–17Google Scholar
  7. Faccin M, Bruscolini P, Pelizzola A (2011) Analysis of the equilibrium and kinetics of the ankyrin repeat protein myotrophin. J Chem Phys 134(075102):1–11Google Scholar
  8. Ferreiro DU, Walczak AM, Komives EA, Wolynes PG (2008) The energy landscape of repeat-containing proteins: topology, cooperativity and the folding funnels of one-dimensional architectures. PLoS Comput Biol 4(e1000070):1–13Google Scholar
  9. Hagai T, Levy Y (2008) Folding of elongated proteins: Conventional or anomalous? J Am Chem Soc 130:14253–14262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hagai T, Azia A, Trizac E, Levy Y (2012) Modulation of folding kinetics of repeat proteins: Interplay between intra and interdomain interactions. Biophys J 103:1555–1565PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hansman UHE (1997) Parallel tempering algorithm for conformational studies of biological molecules. Chem Phys Lett 281:140–150Google Scholar
  12. Jackson SE (1998) How do small single-domain protein fold? Fold Des 3:R81–R91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnson CM (2013) Differential scanning calorimetry as a a tool for protein folding and stability. Arch Biochem Biophys 531:100–109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kajander T, Cortajarena AL, Main E, Mochrie SGJ, Regan L (2005) A new folding paradigm for repeat proteins. J Am Chem Soc 127:10188–10190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kajander T, Cortajarena AL, Mochrie SG, Regan L (2007) Structure and stability of a consensus TPR superhelix. Acta Cryst 63:800–811Google Scholar
  16. Kloss E, Courtemanche N, Barrick D (2008) Repeat protein folding; New insights into origins of cooperativity, stability and topology. Arch Biochem Biophys 469:83–99PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Krobath H, Estácio SG, Faísca PFN, Shakhnovich EI (2012) Identification of a conserved aggregation-prone intermediate state in the folding pathways of Spc-SH3 amyloidogenic variants. J Mol Biol 422:705–722PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kumar S, Rosenberg JM, Bouzida D, Swendsen RH, Kollman PA (1992) The weighted histogram analysis method for free-energy calculations on biomolecules. I. The method. J Comput Chem 13:1011–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lane TJ, Shukla D, Beauchamp KA, Pande VS (2013) To milliseconds and beyond: challenges in the simulation of protein folding. Curr Opin Struct Biol 23:58–65PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lane TJ, Schwantes CR, Beauchamp KA, Pande VS (2013) Probing the origins of two-state folding. J Chem Phys 139(145104):1–8Google Scholar
  21. Larriva M, Prieto L, Bruscolini P, Rey A (2010) A symple simulation model can reproduce the thermodynamic folding intermediate of flavodoxin. Proteins 78:73–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Main E, Jackson SE, Regan L (2003) The folding of repeat proteins: reaching a consensus. Curr Opin Struct Biol 13:482–489PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Main ERG, Xion Y, Cocco MJ, D’Andrea L, Regan L (2003) Design of stable alpha helical arrays from an idealized TPR motif. Structure 11:497–508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Phillips JJ, Javadi Y, Millership C, Main ERG (2011) Modulation of the multistate folding of designed TPR proteins through intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Protein Sci 21:327–338PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Piana S, Lindorff-Larsen K, Shaw DE (2012) Protein folding kinetics and thermodynamics from atomistic simulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:17845–17850PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pirchi M, Ziv G, Riven I, Cohen SS, Zohar N, Barak Y, Haran G (2011) Single-molecule fluorescence spectroscopy maps the folding landscape of a large protein. Nat Commun 2:493–500PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Plaxco KW, Simons KT, Baker D (1998) Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins. J Mol Biol 277:985–994PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Prieto L, de Sancho D, Rey A (2005) Thermodynamics of Gō type models for protein folding. J Chem Phys 123:154903–154911PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Prieto L, Rey A (2007a) Influence of the chain stiffness on the thermodynamics of a Gō type model for protein folding. J Chem Phys 126:165103–165111PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Prieto L, Rey A (2007b) Influence of the native topology on the folding barrier for small proteins. J Chem Phys 127:175101–175111PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Scian M, Shu I, Olsen KA, Hassam K, Andersen NH (2013) Mutational effects on the folding dynamics of a minimized hairpin. Biochemistry 52:2556–2564PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shakhnovich E (2006) Protein folding thermodynamics and dynamics: where physics, chemistry and biology meet. Chem Rev 106:1559–1588PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sugita Y, Okamoto Y (1999) Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding. Chem Phys Lett 314:141–151Google Scholar
  34. Taketomi H, Ueda Y, Gō N (1975) Studies on protein folding, unfolding and fluctuations by computer simulation. 1. Efect of specific amino-acid sequence represented by specific inter-unit interactions. Int J Pept Protein Res 7:445–459PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tang Y, Liu G, Hamilton GK, Ciccosanti G, Shastry R, Rost B, Acton TB, Xiao R, Everett JK, Montelione GT (2014) Northest structural genomic consortium target HR4403E (to be published)Google Scholar
  36. Thirumalai D, O’Brien EP, Morrison G, Hyeon C (2010) Theoretical perspectives of protein folding. Ann Rev Biophys 39:159–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zweifel ME, Barrick D (2001) Studies of the ankyrin repeats of the Drosophila melanogaster Notch receptor. 2: solution stability and cooperativity of unfolding. Biochemistry 40:14357–14367PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Biophysical Societies' Association 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Química Física I, Facultad de Ciencias QuímicasUniversidad ComplutenseMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations