Abstract
Intermittent contact mode atomic force microscopy (AFM) was used to visualize the native plasma membrane of Xenopus laevis oocytes. Oocyte membranes were purified via ultracentrifugation on a sucrose gradient and adsorbed on mica leaves. AFM topographs and the corresponding phase images allowed for visualization and identification of both oocyte plasma membrane patches and pure lipid bilayer regions with a height of about 5 nm within membrane patches. The quantitative analysis showed a normal distribution for the lateral dimension and height of the protein complexes centered on 16.7 ± 0.2 nm (mean ± SE, n = 263) and 5.4 ± 0.1 nm (n = 262), respectively. The phase signal, providing material-dependent information, allowed for the recognition of structural features observed in AFM topographs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramson J, Smirnova I, Kasho V, Verner G, Kaback HR, Iwata S (2003) Structure and mechanism of the lactose permease of Escherichia coli. Science 301:610–615. doi:10.1126/science.1088196
Alessandrini A, Facci P (2005) AFM: a versatile tool in biophysics. Meas Sci Technol 16:R65–R92. doi:10.1088/0957-0233/16/6/R01
Barrera NP, Ge H, Henderson RM, Fitzgerald WJ, Edwardson JM (2008) Automated analysis of the architecture of receptors, imaged by atomic force microscopy. Micron 39:101–110. doi:10.1016/j.micron.2006.12.006
Binnig G, Quate CF, Gerber C (1986) Atomic force microscope. Phys Rev Lett 56:930–933. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.930
Dumont JM (1972) Oogenesis in X. laevis (Daudin). Stages of oocytes development in laboratory maintained animals. J Morphol 136:153–180. doi:10.1002/jmor.1051360203
Engelman DM (2005) Membrane are more mosaic than fluid. Nature 438:578–580. doi:10.1038/nature04394
Faham S, Watanabe A, Mercado Besserer G, Cascio D, Specht A, Hirayama BA, Wright EM, Abramson J (2008) The crystal structure of a sodium galactose transporter reveals mechanistic insights into Na+/sugar symport. Science 321:810–814. doi:10.1126/science.1160406
Hill WG, Southern NM, MacIver B, Potter E, Apodaca G, Smith CP, Zeidel ML (2005) Isolation and characterization of the Xenopus oocyte plasma membrane: a new method for studying activity of water and solute transporters. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 289:F217–F224. doi:10.1152/ajprenal.00022.2005
Hunte C, Screpanti E, Venturi M, Rimon A, Padan A, Michel H (2005) Structure of a Na+/H+ antiporter and insights into mechanism of action and regulation by pH. Nature 435:1197–1202. doi:10.1038/nature03692
Jasti J, Furukawa H, Gonzales EB, Gouaux E (2007) Structure of acid-sensing ion channel 1 at 1.9A° resolution and low pH. Nature 449:316–324. doi:10.1038/nature06163
Larmer J, Schneider SW, Danker T, Schwab A, Oberleithner H (1997) Imaging excised apical plasma membrane patches of MDCK cells in physiological conditions with atomic force microscopy. Pflugers Arch 434:254–260. doi:10.1007/s004240050393
Lau JM, You HX, Yu L (2002) Lattice-like array particles on Xenopus oocyte plasma membrane. Scanning 24:224–231
Le Grimellec C, Lesniewska E, Giocondi MC, Cachia C, Schreiber JP, Goudonnet JP (1995) Imaging of the cytoplasmic leafleat of the plasma membrane by atomic force microscopy. Scanning Microsc 9:401–411
Markiewicz P, Goh MC (1995) Simulation of atomic force microscope tip-sample/sample-tip reconstruction. J Vac Sci Technol B 13:1115–1118. doi:10.1116/1.587913
Meier T, Polzer P, Diederichs K, Welte W, Dimroth P (2005) Structure of the rotor ring F-type Na+-ATPase from Ilyobacter tartaricus. Science 308:659–662
Miyazawa A, Fujiyoshi Y, Unwin N (2003) Structure and gating mechanism of the acetylcholine receptor pore. Nature 423:949–955. doi:10.1038/nature01748
Muller DJ (2008) AFM: a nanotool in membrane biology. Biochemistry 47:7986–7998. doi:10.1021/bi800753x
Orsini F, Santacroce M, Perego C, Lenardi C, Castagna M, Mari SA, Sacchi VF, Poletti G (2006) Atomic force microscopy characterization of Xenopus laevis oocyte plasma membrane. Microsc Res Tech 69:826–834. doi:10.1002/jemt.20353
Raspanti M (1999) Advanced visualization techniques for scanning probe microscopy. Microsc Anal 57:19–21
Santacroce M, Orsini F, Mari SA, Marinone M, Lenardi C, Bettè S, Sacchi VF, Poletti G (2008) Atomic force microscopy imaging of X. laevis oocyte plasma membrane purified by ultracentrifugation. Microsc Res Tech 71:397–402. doi:10.1002/jemt.20559
Schillers H, Danker T, Schnittler HJ, Lang F, Oberleithner H (2000) Plasma membrane plasticity of Xenopus laevis oocyte imaged with atomic force microscopy. Cell Physiol Biochem 10:99–107. doi:10.1159/000016339
Schillers H, Shahin V, Albermann L, Schafer C, Oberleithner H (2004) Imaging CFTR: a tail to tail dimmer with a central pore. Cell Physiol Biochem 14:1–10. doi:10.1159/000076921
Stark M, Moller C, Muller DJ, Guckenberger R (2001) From images to interactions: high-resolution phase imaging in tapping mode atomic force microscopy. Biophys J 80:3009–3018. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76266-2
Tamayo J, Garcia R (1996) Deformation, contact time, and phase-contrast in tapping mode scanning force microscopy. Langmuir 12:4430–4435. doi:10.1021/la960189l
von Heijne G, Rees D (2008) Membranes: reading between the lines. Curr Opin Struct Biol 18:403–405. doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2008.06.003
Yamashita A, Singh SK, Kawate T, Jin Y, Gouaux E (2005) Crystal structure of a bacterial homologue of Na+/Cl− dependent neurotransmitter transporters. Nature 437:215–223. doi:10.1038/nature03978
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr. Andrea Cremona for his technical assistance and support given to this work and Dr. Daniel Beck from Warwick University for the revision of the manuscript. This research was funded by grants from the Italian Ministry of Research and University (FIRB programme No. RBNE03B8KK-08) to V.F.S. for the project “Investigation of protein structure and function by AFM and physiological studies.”
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Orsini, F., Santacroce, M., Arosio, P. et al. Intermittent contact mode AFM investigation of native plasma membrane of Xenopus laevis oocyte. Eur Biophys J 38, 903–910 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-009-0464-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-009-0464-7