Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Predation by Colpoda sp. in Nitrogen Fixation Rate of Two Free-Living Bacteria

  • Soil Microbiology
  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biological nitrogen fixation is limited to several groups of prokaryotes, some of them reduce nitrogen as free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria. Protozoa predation on these latter releases sequestered nitrogen that may enhance the formation of new bacterial biomass and possibly increase nitrogen fixation within soil microbial communities. We aim to evaluate the predation effect of Colpoda sp. on two nitrogen fixers: Azospirillum lipoferum and Stenotrophomonas sp. during their lag, early exponential, and exponential phases. The kinetics of bacterial population growth was determined in the predators’ presence or absence and the effect of predation on the rate of N fixation was evaluated through the reduction of acetylene to ethylene technique. Colpoda sp. showed a non-significant difference in preferences between the two species offered as prey. Consequently, the abundance of A. lipoferum and Stenotrophomonas sp. decreased significantly due to predator’s pressure and both species responded by increasing their specific growth rate. Likewise, predation promoted greater nitrogen fixation rate by CFU during the lag phase in A. lipoferum (0.20 nM/CFU with predation vs 0.09 nM/CFU without predation) and Stenotrophomonas sp. (0.22 nM/CFU vs 0.09 nM/CFU respectively). During early exponential phase (29 h), the rate diminished to 0.13 and 0.05 nM/CFU in A. lipoferum and to 0.09 nM/CFU and 0.05 nM/CFU in Stenotrophomonas sp. Finally, during the exponential phase (52 h), only A. lipoferum without predation produced 0.003 nM/CFU of ethylene. Thus, the nitrogenase activity was higher in the lag and the early exponential phases when predator activity was involved.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data are available upon request to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Vitousek PM, Cassman K, Cleveland C, Crews T, Field CB, Grimm NB, Howarth RW, Marino R, Martinelli L, Rastetter EB, Sprent JI (2002) Towards an ecological understanding of biological nitrogen fixation. Biogeochemistry 57:1–45. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015798428743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dilworth MJ (1966) Acetylene reduction by nitrogen fixing preparations from Clostridium pasteurianum. Biochem Biophys, Acta 127:285–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tsagou V, Aggelis G (2006) Growth dynamics of Azospirillum lipoferum at steady and transitory states in the presence of NH4+. J Appl Microbiol 100:286–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02782.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kefalogianni IO, Aggel G (2002) Modeling growth and biochemical activities of Azospirillum spp. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 58:352–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-001-0890-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Smercina DN, Evans SE, Friesen ML, Tiemann LK (2019) To fix or not to fix: controls on free-living nitrogen fixation in the rhizosphere. Appl Environ Microbiol 85:e02546-e2618. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02546-18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Postgate JR (1982) The Fundamentals of Nitrogen Fixation. Cambridge University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bailey JE, Ollis DF (1986) Biochemical Engineering Fundamentals, 2nd ed. McGraw- Hill Int., Singapore

  8. Atlas RM, Bartha R (1993) Microbial Ecology: Fundamentals and Applications, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fukami J, Cerezini P, Hungria Mariangela (2018) Azospirillum: benefits that go far beyond biological nitrogen fixation. AMB Express. 8https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-018-0608-1

  10. Banerjee M, Yesmin L (2002) Sulfur-oxidizing plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for enhanced canola performance. US Patent 07491535.

  11. Park M, Kim C, Yang J, Lee H, Shin W, Kim S, Sa T (2005) Isolation and characterization of diazotrophic growth promoting bacteria from rhizosphere of agricultural crops of Korea. Microbiol Res 160:127–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2004.10.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ryan R, Monchy S, Cardinale M et al (2009) The versatility and adaptation of bacteria from the genus Stenotrophomonas. Nat Rev Microbiol 7:514–525. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kennedy IR, Tchan Y (1992) Biological nitrogen fixation in non-leguminous field crops: Recent advances. Plant Soil 141:93–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00011312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Woldendrop JW (1981) Nutrients in the rhizosphere. In Colloquim International Potash Instituten (16., Bern, 1981). Agriculture yield potentials in continental climates. Bern, Swiss, Int. Potash Inst. 99–125.

  15. Elliott ET (1978) Carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus transformations in gnotobiotic soil microcosms. Ph.D. Thesis. Colorado State University, U.S.A. 77p.

  16. Fenchel T (1987) Ecology of protozoa. Madison, Wis. U.S.A. Science Tech. 197.

  17. Vargas R, Hattori T (1990) The distribution of protozoa among soil aggregates. FEMS Microb Ecol 38:233–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1097(90)90517-T

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hahn MW, Höfle MG (2001) Grazing of protozoa and its effect on populations of aquatic bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 35:113–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2001.tb00794.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jürgens K, Güde H (1994) The potential importance of grazing-resistant bacteria in planktonic systems. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 112:169–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Matz C, Jürgens K (2002) Predation as a shaping force for the phenotypic and genotypic composition of planktonic bacteria. Ant Leeuwenhoek 81:413–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Corliss J, Esser S (1974) Comments on the Role of the Cyst in the Life Cycle and Survival of Free-Living Protozoa. Trans Am Microsc Soc 93(4):578–593. https://doi.org/10.2307/3225158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Paisie TK, Miller TE, Manson OU (2014) Effects of a ciliate protozoa predator on microbial communities in pitcher plant (Sarraceniapurpurea) Leaves. PLoS ONE 910:1371. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113384

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Miki T, Jacquet S (2008) Complex interactions in the microbial world: underxplored key links between viruses, bacteria and protozoan grazers in aquatic environments. Aquat Microb Ecol 51:195–208. https://doi.org/10.3354/ame01190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Šimek K, Horňák K, Mašín M, Christaki U, Nedoma J, Weinbauer MG, Dolan JR (2003) Comparing the effects of resource enrichment and grazing on a bacterioplankton community of a meso-eutrophic reservoir. Aquat Microb Ecol 31:123–213. https://doi.org/10.3354/ame031123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dolinsek Lagkouvardos I, Wanek W, Wagner M, Daims H (2013) Interactions of nitrifying bacteria and heterotrophs: identification of a micaviobrio-like putative predator of nitrospira sp. Applied and Environ Microb 79:2027–2037. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03408-1224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bamforth S. (1992) Sampling and enumerating soil protozoa. In A. T. Lee & J. J. Soldo (Eds.), Protocols in protozoology (p. B-5.1). Lawrence, Kansas: Allen Press.

  27. Foissner W, Berger H, Kohamann F (1992) Taxonomische and Okologische Revision der Ciliaten des Saprobiensystems Band: Cytophorida, Oligotrichida, Hypotrichia, Colpodea. Informationsberichte des Bayerischenlandesamtes fur Wasserwirtschaft.

  28. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ (1991) 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. American Society for Microbiology 173(2):697–703. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.173.2.697-703.1991

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Herrera DJ (2013) Preferencia alimenticia del ciliado Colpodasteinni sobre seis especies de bacterias tolerantes al combustóleo (tesis de licenciatura). Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rennie RJ (1981) A single medium for the isolation of acetylene reducing (dinitrogen-fixing) bacteria from soils. Can J Microbiol 27:8–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mandelstam J, McQuillen K (1973) Biochemistry of bacterial growth. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, p 582

    Google Scholar 

  32. Fox JW (2002) Testing a simple rule for dominance in resource competition. Am Nat 159:305–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. González RT, Rodríguez ZS, Ferrera CR (2008) Fertility islands around Prosopis laevigata and Pachycereus hollianus in the drylands of Zapotitlán Salinas. México J Arid Environments 72:1202–1212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2007.12.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Frey-Klett P, Burlinson P, Deveau A, Barret M, Tarkka M, Sarniguet A (2011) Bacterial-fungal interactions: hyphens between agricultural, clinical, environmental, and food microbiologists. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 75:583–609. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00020-11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Shemesh Y, Jurkevitch E (2004) Plastic phenotypic resistance to predation by Bdellovibrio and like organisms in bacterial prey. Environ Microbial 6:12–18. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1462-2920.2003.00530.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lythgoe KA, Read AF (1998) Catching the Red Queen? The advice of the rose. Trends Ecol Evol 13:473–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01486-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Matz C, Bergfeld T, Rice S, Kjelleberg S (2004) Micro colonies, quorum sensing and cytotoxicity determine the survival of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms exposed protozoan grazing. Environ Microbiol 6:218–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00556.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Otto S, Harms H, Wick LY (2017) Effects of predation and dispersal on bacterial abundance and contaminant biodegradation. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 93:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiw241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Andersen O, Goldman J, Caron DA, Dennett MR (1986) Nutrient cycling in a microflagellate food- chain: III Phosphorus dynamics. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 31:47–55. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps031047

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Epstein SS, Shiaris MP (1992) Size selective grazing of coastal bacterioplankton by natural assemblages of pigmented flagellates, colourless flagellates and ciliates. MicrobEcol 23:211–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00164097

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Griffiths BS (1996) Mineralization of nitrogen and phosphorus by mixed cultures of the ciliate protozoan Colpoda steinii, the nematode Rhabditis sp. and the bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens. Soil Biol Biochem 18:637–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(86)90087-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Darbyshire JF (1972) Nitrogen fixation by Azotobacterchroococcum in the presence of Colpoda steinii, the influence of temperature. Soil Biol Biochem 4:359–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Drake JF, Tsuchiya HM (1997) Growth kinetics of Colpoda steinni on Escherichia coli. Appl Eviron Microbiol 34:18–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hunt HW, Cole CV, Klein DA, Elliot ET, Coleman DC (1997) A simulation model for the effect of predation on bacteria in continuous culture. Microb Ecol 3:259–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02010735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hernández AE, Ferrera CR, Rodríguez VR (2003) Bacterias de vida libre fijadoras de nitrógeno atmosférico en rizósfera de frijol contaminado con queroseno. TERRA Latinoamericana 21:81–89

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Our special thanks are due to Postgrado en Ciencias Biologicas, UNAM and CONACyT (Mexical Council of Science and Technology) for financial support to C. M. Martínez-Reyes, during his master’s degree. We are also grateful for the support from the project PAPIIT IN222618.

Funding

Partial financial support was received from PAPIIT IN222618, DGAPA-UNAM. Furthermore, Carlos Martínez Reyes was awarded a scholarship from CONACyT to obtain his master’s degree at Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas de la UNAM.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: Nathalie Cabirol, Alejandro Alarcón, Carlos Manuel Martínez Reyes, and Salvador Rodríguez Zaragoza. Methodology feeding preferences: Salvador Rodríguez Zaragoza and Carlos Manuel Martínez Reyes. Methodology nitrogen fixing and predator prey counts: Nathalie Cabirol, Ma Remedios Mendoza López, Alejandro Alarcón, and Carlos Manuel Martínez Reyes. Formal analysis and investigation: Nathalie Cabitol, Ma. Remedios Mendoza López, Alejandro Alarcón, Carlos Manuel Martínez Reyes, Salvador Rodríguez Zaragoza. Writing—original draft preparation: Alejandro Alarcón, Carlos Manuel Martínez Reyes. Writing—review and editing: Nathalie Cabirol, Ma. Remedios Mendoza López, Salvador Rodríguez Zaragoza. Funding acquisition: Salvador Rodríguez Zaragoza. Resources: PAPIIT IN222618, Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico (DGAPA), UNAM. Funding acquisition: Carlos Manuel Martínez Reyes. Resources: CONACyT Scholarship granted through posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas de la UNAM.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salvador Rodríguez-Zaragoza.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

No approval of research ethics committees was required to accomplish the goals of this study because experimental work was conducted with a reference strain and a bacteria species isolated from soil as well as a microbial eukaryote.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martínez-Reyes, C.M., Rodríguez-Zaragoza, S., Cabirol, N. et al. Effect of Predation by Colpoda sp. in Nitrogen Fixation Rate of Two Free-Living Bacteria. Microb Ecol 83, 1026–1035 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-021-01813-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-021-01813-9

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Nathalie Cabirol