Vaginal Microbiome of Pregnant Indian Women: Insights into the Genome of Dominant Lactobacillus Species

Abstract

The trillions of microorganisms residing in the human body display varying degrees of compositional and functional diversities within and between individuals and contribute significantly to host physiology and susceptibility to disease. Microbial species present in the vaginal milieu of reproductive age women showed a large personal component and varies widely in different ethnic groups at the taxonomic, genomic, and functional levels. Lactobacillus iners, L. crispatus, L. gasseri, L. jensenii, and L. johnsonii are most frequently detected bacterial species in the vaginal milieu of reproductive age women. However, we currently lack (i) an understanding of the baseline vaginal microbiota of reproductive age Indian women, (ii) the extent of taxonomic and functional variations of vaginal microbiota between individuals and (iii) the genomic repertoires of the dominant vaginal microbiota associated with the Indian subjects. In our study, we analyzed the metagenome of high vaginal swab (HVS) samples collected from 40 pregnant Indian women enrolled in the GARBH-Ini cohort. Composition and abundance of bacterial species was characterized by pyrosequencing 16S rRNA gene. We identified 3067 OTUs with ≥ 10 reads from four different bacterial phyla. Several species of lactobacilli were clustered into three community state types (CSTs). L. iners, L. crispatus, L. gasseri, and L. jensenii are the most frequently detected Lactobacillus species in the vaginal environment of Indian women. Other than Lactobacillus, several species of Halomonas were also identified in the vaginal environment of most of the women sampled. To gain genomic and functional insights, we isolated several Lactobacillus species from the HVS samples and explored their whole genome sequences by shotgun sequencing. We analyzed the genome of dominant Lactobacillus species, L. iners, L. crispatus, L. gasseri, and L. paragesseri to represent the CSTs and identify functions that may influence the composition of complex vaginal microbial ecology. This study reports for the first time the vaginal microbial ecology of Indian women and genomic insights into L. iners, L. crispatus, L. gasseri, and L. paragesseri commonly found in the genital tract of reproductive age women.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. 1.

    Ma B, Forney LJ, Ravel J (2012) Vaginal microbiome: rethinking health and disease. Annu Rev Microbiol 66:371–389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Lloyd-Price J, Mahurkar A, Rahnavard G, Crabtree J, Orvis J, Hall AB, Brady A, Creasy HH, McCracken C, Giglio MG, McDonald D, Franzosa EA, Knight R, White O, Huttenhower C (2017) Strains, functions and dynamics in the expanded Human Microbiome Project. Nature 550:61–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Dominguez-Bello MG, De Jesus-Laboy KM, Shen N, Cox LM, Amir A, Gonzalez A, Bokulich NA, Song SJ, Hoashi M, Rivera-Vinas JI, Mendez K, Knight R, Clemente JC (2016) Partial restoration of the microbiota of cesarean-born infants via vaginal microbial transfer. Nat Med 22:250–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Hyman RW, Fukushima M, Diamond L, Kumm J, Giudice LC, Davis RW (2005) Microbes on the human vaginal epithelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:7952–7957

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ravel J, Gajer P, Abdo Z, Schneider GM, Koenig SS, McCulle SL et al (2011) Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(Suppl 1):4680–4687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Fettweis JM, Brooks JP, Serrano MG, Sheth NU, Girerd PH, Edwards DJ, Strauss JF, The Vaginal Microbiome C, Jefferson KK, Buck GA (2014) Differences in vaginal microbiome in African American women versus women of European ancestry. Microbiology 160:2272–2282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Callahan BJ, DiGiulio DB, Goltsman DSA, Sun CL, Costello EK, Jeganathan P, Biggio JR, Wong RJ, Druzin ML, Shaw GM, Stevenson DK, Holmes SP, Relman DA (2017) Replication and refinement of a vaginal microbial signature of preterm birth in two racially distinct cohorts of US women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:9966–9971

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Ghartey JP, Smith BC, Chen Z, Buckley N, Lo Y, Ratner AJ, Herold BC, Burk RD (2014) Lactobacillus crispatus dominant vaginal microbiome is associated with inhibitory activity of female genital tract secretions against Escherichia coli. PLoS One 9:e96659

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Walther-Antonio MR, Jeraldo P, Berg Miller ME, Yeoman CJ, Nelson KE, Wilson BA, White BA, Chia N, Creedon DJ (2014) Pregnancy’s stronghold on the vaginal microbiome. PLoS One 9:e98514

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Haque MM, Merchant M, Kumar PN, Dutta A, Mande SS (2017) First-trimester vaginal microbiome diversity: a potential indicator of preterm delivery risk. Sci Rep 7:16145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hillier SL, Nugent RP, Eschenbach DA, Krohn MA, Gibbs RS, Martin DH, Cotch MF, Edelman R, Pastorek 2nd JG, Rao AV et al (1995) Association between bacterial vaginosis and preterm delivery of a low-birth-weight infant. The Vaginal Infections and Prematurity Study Group. N Engl J Med 333:1737–1742

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Freitas AC, Bocking A, Hill JE, Money DM, Group VR (2018) Increased richness and diversity of the vaginal microbiota and spontaneous preterm birth. Microbiome 6:117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kindinger LM, MacIntyre DA, Lee YS, Marchesi JR, Smith A, McDonald JA, Terzidou V, Cook JR, Lees C, Israfil-Bayli F, Faiza Y, Toozs-Hobson P, Slack M, Cacciatore S, Holmes E, Nicholson JK, Teoh TG, Bennett PR (2016) Relationship between vaginal microbial dysbiosis, inflammation, and pregnancy outcomes in cervical cerclage. Sci Transl Med 8:350ra102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Bhatnagar S, Majumder PP, Salunke DM, Interdisciplinary Group for Advanced Research on Birth Outcomes DBTII (2019) A pregnancy cohort to study multidimensional correlates of preterm birth in India: study design, implementation, and baseline characteristics of the participants. Am J Epidemiol 188(4):621–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Garg KB, Ganguli I, Das R, Talwar GP (2009) Spectrum of Lactobacillus species present in healthy vagina of Indian women. Indian J Med Res 129:652–657

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Madhivanan P, Alleyn HN, Raphael E, Krupp K, Ravi K, Nebhrajani R, Arun A, Reingold AL, Riley LW, Klausner JD (2015) Identification of culturable vaginal Lactobacillus species among reproductive age women in Mysore, India. J Med Microbiol 64:636–641

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Yeruva T, Rajkumar H, Donugama V (2017) Vaginal lactobacilli profile in pregnant women with normal & abnormal vaginal flora. Indian J Med Res 146(4):534–540

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Bag S, Saha B, Mehta O, Anbumani D, Kumar N, Dayal M, Pant A, Kumar P, Saxena S, Allin KH, Hansen T, Arumugam M, Vestergaard H, Pedersen O, Pereira V, Abraham P, Tripathi R, Wadhwa N, Bhatnagar S, Prakash VG, Radha V, Anjana RM, Mohan V, Takeda K, Kurakawa T, Nair GB, Das B (2016) An improved method for high quality Metagenomics DNA extraction from human and environmental samples. Sci Rep 6:26775

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Edgar RC (2010) Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26(19):2460–2461

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Cole JR, Chai B, Farris RJ, Wang Q, Kulam-Syed-Mohideen AS, McGarrell D, Bandela AM, Cardenas E, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM (2007) The ribosomal database project (RDP-II): introducing myRDP space and quality controlled public data. Nucleic Acids Res 35(Database issue):D169–D172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Naser SM, Dawyndt P, Hoste B, Gevers D, Vandemeulebroecke K, Cleenwerck I, Vancanneyt M, Swings J (2007) Identification of lactobacilli by pheS and rpoA gene sequence analyses. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57(Pt 12):2777–2789

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Verma J, Bag S, Saha B, Kumar P, Ghosh TS, Dayal M, Senapati T, Mehra S, Dey P, Desigamani A, Kumar D, Rana P, Kumar B, Maiti TK, Sharma NC, Bhadra RK, Mutreja A, Nair GB, Ramamurthy T, Das B (2019) Genomic plasticity associated with antimicrobial resistance in Vibrio cholerae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116(13):6226–6231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Zimin AV, Marcais G, Puiu D, Roberts M, Salzberg SL, Yorke JA (2013) The MaSuRCA genome assembler. Bioinformatics 29:2669–2677

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Witkin SS, Linhares IM, Giraldo P (2007) Bacterial flora of the female genital tract: function and immune regulation. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 21:347–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Goldstein EJ, Tyrrell KL, Citron DM (2015) Lactobacillus species: taxonomic complexity and controversial susceptibilities. Clin Infect Dis 60(Suppl 2):S98–S107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Walter J, Ley R (2011) The human gut microbiome: ecology and recent evolutionary changes. Annu Rev Microbiol 65:411–429

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Pareek S, Kurakawa T, Das B et al (2019) Comparison of Japanese and Indian intestinal microbiota shows diet-dependent interaction between bacteria and fungi. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 5:37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Das B, Nair GB (2019) Homeostasis and dysbiosis of the gut microbiome in health and disease. J Biosci 44:117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Farage MA, Miller KW, Sobel JD (2010) Dynamics of the vaginal ecosystem-hormonal influences. Infect Dis Res Treat. https://doi.org/10.4137/IDRT.S3903

  30. 30.

    Verstraelen H, Verhelst R, Claeys G, De Backer E, Temmerman M, Vaneechoutte M (2009) Longitudinal analysis of the vaginal microflora in pregnancy suggests that L. crispatus promotes the stability of the normal vaginal microflora and that L. gasseri and/or L. iners are more conducive to the occurrence of abnormal vaginal microflora. BMC Microbiol 9:116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Ma B, France MT, Crabtree J, Holm JB, Humphrys MS, Brotman RM, Ravel J (2020) A comprehensive non-redundant gene catalog reveals extensive within-community intraspecies diversity in the human vagina. Nat Commun 11:940

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Srinivasan S, Hoffman NG, Morgan MT et al (2012) Bacterial communities in women with bacterial vaginosis: high resolution phylogenetic analyses reveal relationships of microbiota to clinical criteria. PLoS One 7:e37818

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    France MT, Mendes-Soares H, Forney LJ (2016) Genomic comparisons of Lactobacillus crispatus and Lactobacillus iners reveal potential ecological drivers of community composition in the vagina. Appl Environ Microbiol 82(24):7063–7073

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Abdelmaksoud AA, Koparde VN, Sheth NU, Serrano MG, Glascock AL, Fettweis JM, Strauss JF, Buck GA, Jefferson KK (2016) Comparison of Lactobacillus crispatus isolates from Lactobacillus-dominated vaginal microbiomes with isolates from microbiomes containing bacterial vaginosis-associated bacteria. Microbiology 162:466–475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Haiser HJ, Gootenberg DB, Chatman K, Sirasani G, Balskus EP, Turnbaugh PJ (2013) Predicting and manipulating cardiac drug inactivation by the human gut bacterium Eggerthella lenta. Science 341:295–298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Archana Pant for critical reading of our article and constructive suggestions. Authors acknowledge Ms. Sonali Porey and Dr. Shakti Kumar for technical assistance. We thank all the staff of GARBH-Ini cohort including research physicians, study nurses, clinical and laboratory technicians, field workers, internal quality improvement team, project team, and the data management team. We are grateful to Prof. M.K. Bhan, Prof. H.P.S. Sachdev, Prof. R.M. Pandey, and other members of the Steering Committee for their scientific and technical inputs. We specifically thank S. Sinha and Dr. A. Gambhir from the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India, for their generous support. We acknowledge the supports of administrative staff of all participating institutes, particularly V. Krishnamoorthy (Grants Manager, THSTI) and M. Juyal (Technical Officer, Data Management). We wish to extend our thank to the two hospitals (Gurugram Civil Hospital and Safdarjung Hospital) and their staff and the team of expert radiologists (Dr. C. Singh, Dr. G. Sahi, Dr. S.B. Chaudhary, Dr. R. Mishra) for facilitating the study. The work was funded by the Department of Biotechnology, Govt. of India (No.BT/PR9983/MED/97/194/2013) and, for some components of the biorepository, by the Grand Challenges India–All Children Thriving Program, Biotechnology Industry Research Assistance Council (grant BIRAC/GCI/0114/03/14-ACT). Funding agency has no role in study designing, sample collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and writing the manuscript.

MEMBERS OF GARBH-Ini: Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, NCR Biotech Cluster, Faridabad, Delhi NCR, India (Shinjini Bhatnagar, Bhabatosh Das, Nitya Wadhwa, Pallavi S. Kshetrapal, Balakrish G. Balakrish Nair, Uma Chandra Mouli Natchu, Satyajit Rath, Kanika Sachdeva, Shailaja Sopory, Sumit Misra, Amanpreet Singh, Dharmendra Sharma, Ramachandran Thiruvengadam,); National Institute of Biomedical Genomics, Kalyani, West Bengal, India (Arindam Maitra, Partha P. Majumder); Regional Centre for Biotechnology, NCR Biotech Cluster, Faridabad, Delhi NCR, India (Tushar K. Maiti, Dinakar M. Salunke); Clinical Development Services Agency, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, NCR Biotech Cluster, Faridabad, Delhi NCR, India (Monika Bahl); Gurugram Civil Hospital, Haryana, India (Sunita Sharma, Umesh Mehta, Brahmdeep Sindhu); Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India (Sugandha Arya, Rekha Bharti, Harish Chellani, Pratima Mittal); Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India (Siddarth Ramji, Reva Tripathi, Anju Garg); The Ultrasound Lab, Defense Colony, New Delhi, India (Ashok Khurana); Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Jamia Hamdard University, New Delhi, India (Reva Tripathi); All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India (Smriti Hari, Yashdeep Gupta, Nikhil Tandon); Government of Haryana, India (Rakesh Gupta); International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, New Delhi, India (Dinakar M. Salunke); and Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune, Maharashtra, India (Vineeta Bal).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

BD, SB, and GBN conceived the idea and designed the experiments. Members of GARBH-Ini cohort collected HVS samples. OM, TSG, RG, RM, and AK performed experiments. BD, SB, PK, RT, and NW contributed reagents. BD, TSG, OM, and SB did data analysis. BD wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bhabatosh Das.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(XLS 17271 kb).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mehta, O., Ghosh, T.S., Kothidar, A. et al. Vaginal Microbiome of Pregnant Indian Women: Insights into the Genome of Dominant Lactobacillus Species. Microb Ecol 80, 487–499 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-020-01501-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Vaginal microbiome
  • Metagenomics
  • Whole genome
  • Lactobacillus
  • Microbial ecology