In Vitro Response of Rumen Microbiota to the Antimethanogenic Red Macroalga Asparagopsis taxiformis
The red macroalga Asparagopsis taxiformis has been shown to significantly decrease methane production by rumen microbial communities. This has been attributed to the bioaccumulation of halogenated methane analogues produced as algal secondary metabolites. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of A. taxiformis supplementation on the relative abundance of methanogens and microbial community structure during in vitro batch fermentation. Addition of A. taxiformis (2% organic matter) or the halogenated methane analogue bromoform (5 μM) reduced methane production by over 99% compared to a basal substrate-only control. Quantitative PCR confirmed that the decrease in methane production was correlated with a decrease in the relative abundance of methanogens. High-throughput 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplicon sequencing showed that both treatments reduced the abundance of the three main orders of methanogens present in ruminants (Methanobacteriales, Methanomassiliicoccales and Methanomicrobiales). Shifts in bacterial community structure due to the addition of A. taxiformis and 5 μM bromoform were similar and concomitant with increases in hydrogen concentration in the headspace of the fermenters. With high potency and broad-spectrum activity against rumen methanogens, A. taxiformis represents a promising natural strategy for reducing enteric methane emissions from ruminant livestock.
KeywordsMethane Rumen Livestock Seaweed Bromoform
We thank Dr. Mike Devery for kindly supplying the bromochloromethane used in this study and Dr. Matthew Vucko for assistance with the experiments. We also thank Jeffrey Palpratt from the College of Public Health, Medical & Veterinary Sciences for handling and maintenance of the donor steers, and Dr. Shane Askew from the Advanced Analytical Centre, JCU, for analytical advice.
This research was supported by the Australian Government Department of Agriculture and Meat & Livestock Australia, funded as part of the National Livestock Methane Program. It was also supported by MBD Energy and the Australian Government through the Advanced Manufacturing Cooperative Research Centre, funded through the Australian Government’s Cooperative Research Centre Scheme.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Experimental protocols were approved by the CSIRO Animal Ethics Committee (A5/2011) under the Australian Code of Practice for Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes
- 1.Kamra D (2005) Rumen microbial ecosystem. Curr Sci 89:124–135Google Scholar
- 7.IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 1009Google Scholar
- 16.Abecia L, Toral PG, Martín-García AI, Martínez G, Tomkins NW, Molina-Alcaide E, Newbold CJ, Yáñez-Ruiz DR (2012) Effect of bromochloromethane on methane emission, rumen fermentation pattern, milk yield, and fatty acid profile in lactating dairy goats. J Dairy Sci 95:2027–2036. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4831 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Mitsumori M, Shinkai T, Takenaka A, Enishi O, Higuchi K, Kobayashi Y, Nonaka I, Asanuma N, Denman SE, McSweeney CS (2012) Responses in digestion, rumen fermentation and microbial populations to inhibition of methane formation by a halogenated methane analogue. Br J Nutr 108:482–491CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Hristov A, Oh J, Meinen R, Montes F, Ott T, Firkins J, Rotz A, Dell C, Adesogan A, Yang W, Tricarico J, Kebreab E, Waghorn G, Dijkstra J, Oosting S (2013) Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in livestock production—a review of technical options for non-CO2 emissions. In: Gerber P, Henderson B, Makkar H (eds) FAO Animal Production and Health Paper No 177, Rome, Italy, p 231Google Scholar
- 30.NHMRC (2013) Australian code for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes. National Health and Medical Research Council, CanberraGoogle Scholar
- 37.Anderson M, Gorley R, Clarke K (2008) PERMANOVA + for PRIMER: guide to software and statistical methods. PRIMER-EGoogle Scholar
- 38.Clarke KR, Gorley RN (2006) PRIMER v6: user manual/tutorial. PRIMER-E Ltd, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
- 48.Denman SE, Fernandez GM, Shinkai T, Mitsumori M, McSweeney CS (2015) Metagenomic analysis of the rumen microbial community following inhibition of methane formation by a halogenated methane analog. Front Microbiol 6:1087. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01087 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 49.Li X, Norman HC, Kinley RD, Laurence M, Wilmot M, Bender H, de Nys R, Tomkins N (2016) Asparagopsis taxiformis decreases enteric methane production from sheep. Anim Prod Sci AN15883. doi: https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15883