The Aboveground Vegetation Type and Underground Soil Property Mediate the Divergence of Soil Microbiomes and the Biological Interactions
- 748 Downloads
The composition of the soil microbiome is influenced by environmental (abiotic) variables and biological interactions (biotic factors). To determine whether the aboveground vegetation and soil physicochemical properties were the main determinant of beta-diversity and biological interaction of soil microbial community, we sampled soils from the temperate coniferous forest and grassland. Clustering of operational taxonomic units was conducted using 16S rRNA gene. We found that the microbial composition of the rhizospheres, in which root exudates influence the microbial environment, show lower alpha-diversity than that of nonroot soils. The nonsignificant rhizosphere effect suggested other undetermined factors or stochastic processes accounted for microbial diversity in the rhizosphere. More significant microbe-microbe interactions were observed in forest and rhizosphere soils relative to the grassland soils. The elevated number of positive correlations for relative abundances in forest soil implied beneficial associations being common among bacteria, in particular within the rhizosphere environment. The particular soil properties generated by root exudates also alter the physicochemical properties of soil such as K and pH value, and might in turn favor the adoption of teamwork-cooperation strategies for microbe-microbe interactions, represented as large clusters of positive associations among bacterial taxa. Specific biological interactions differentiated the microbiomes within forest soils. Thus, the environmental selection pressure of aboveground vegetation accounts for differences between soil microbiomes while biotic factors are responsible for fine-scale differences of the microbial community in forest soils.
KeywordsBiological interactions Environmental factors Forest Grassland Rhizosphere Soil microbiome
This research was financially supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities to SHW and supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 105-2628-B-003-001-MY3 and MOST 105-2628-B-003-002-MY3) to PCL. This article was also subsidized by the National Taiwan Normal University (NTNU).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 3.Barra PJ, Inostroza NG, Acuña JJ, Mora ML, Crowley DE, Jorquera MA (2016) Formulation of bacterial consortia from avocado (Persea americana Mill.) and their effect on growth, biomass and superoxide dismutase activity of wheat seedlings under salt stress. Appl. Soil Ecol. 102:80–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Mitchell RJ, Hester AJ, Campbell CD, Chapman SJ, Cameron CM, Hewison RL, Potts JM (2012) Explaining the variation in the soil microbial community: do vegetation composition and soil chemistry explain the same or different parts of the microbial variation? Plant Soil 351:355–362. doi: 10.1007/s11104-011-0968-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Mummey DL, Clarke JT, Cole CA, O'Connor BG, Gannon JE, Ramsey PW (2010) Spatial analysis reveals differences in soil microbial community interactions between adjacent coniferous forest and clearcut ecosystems. Soil Biol. Biochem. 42:1138–1147. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.03.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Ranjard L, Dequiedt S, Prevost-Boure NC, Thioulouse J, Saby NPA, Lelievre M, Maron PA, Morin FER, Bispo A, Jolivet C, Arrouays D, Lemanceau P (2013) Turnover of soil bacterial diversity driven by wide-scale environmental heterogeneity. Nat. Commun. 4:1434. doi: 10.1111/ 143410.1038/Ncomms2431 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Burns JH, Anacker BL, Strauss SY, Burke DJ (2015) Soil microbial community variation correlates most strongly with plant species identity, followed by soil chemistry, spatial location and plant genus. AoB Plants 7: plv030. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plv030
- 22.Vega-Avila AD, Gumiere T, Andrade PAM, Lima-Perim JE, Durrer A, Baigori M, Vazquez F, Andreote FD (2015) Bacterial communities in the rhizosphere of Vitis vinifera L. cultivated under distinct agricultural practices in Argentina. Anton Leeuw. Int. J. G. 107:575–588. doi: 10.1007/s10482-014-0353-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, Lesniewski RA, Oakley BB, Parks DH, Robinson CJ, Sahl JW, Stres B, Thallinger GG, Van Horn DJ, Weber CF (2009) Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:7537–7541. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01541-09 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 34.Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Fierer N, Pena AG, Goodrich JK, Gordon JI, Huttley GA, Kelley ST, Knights D, Koenig JE, Ley RE, Lozupone CA, McDonald D, Muegge BD, Pirrung M, Reeder J, Sevinsky JR, Turnbaugh PJ, Walters WA, Widmann J, Yatsunenko T, Zaneveld J, Knight R (2010) QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 7:335–336. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 35.Cole JR, Chai B, Farris RJ, Wang Q, Kulam-Syed-Mohideen AS, McGarrell DM, Bandela AM, Cardenas E, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM (2007) The ribosomal database project (RDP-II): introducing myRDP space and quality controlled public data. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:D169–D172. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl889 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 39.Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical Ecology, 2nd edn. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, Google Scholar
- 45.Blais A-M, Lorrain S, Plourde Y, Varfalvy L (2005) Organic carbon densities of soils and vegetation of tropical, temperate and boreal forests. In: Tremblay A, Varfalvy L, Roehm C, Garneau M (eds) Greenhouse gas emissions—fluxes and processes: hydroelectric reservoirs and natural environments. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 155–185Google Scholar
- 62.Kahle D, Wickham H (2013) Ggmap: spatial visualization with ggplot2. R Journal 5:144–161Google Scholar