Skip to main content

Comparative Analysis of Drosophila melanogaster Gut Microbiota with Respect to Host Strain, Sex, and Age

Microbial Ecology volume 74, pages 207–216 (2017)Cite this article

Abstract

Microbiota has a significant impact on the health of the host individual. The complexity of the interactions between mammalian hosts and their microbiota highlights the value of using Drosophila melanogaster as a model organism, because of its relatively simple microbial community and ease of physiological and genetic manipulation. However, highly variable and sometimes inconsistent results regarding the microbiota of D. melanogaster have been reported for host samples collected from different geographical locations; discrepancies that may be because of the inherent physiological conditions of the D. melanogaster host. Here, we conducted a comparative analysis of the gut microbiota of two D. melanogaster laboratory strains, w 1118 and Canton S, with respect to the sex and age of the host, by pyrosequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. In addition to the widespread and abundant commensal bacterial genera Lactobacillus and Acetobacter, we identified Enterococcus and Leuconostoc as major host-strain-specific bacterial genera. The relative proportions of these bacterial genera, and those of the species within each, were found to differ markedly with respect to strain, sex, and age of the host, even though host individuals were reared under the same nutritional conditions. By using various bioinformatic tools, we uncovered several characteristic features of microbiota corresponding to specific categories of the flies: host-sex-bias association of specific bacteria, age-dependent alteration of microbiota across host species and sex, and uniqueness of the microbiota of female w 1118 flies. Our results, thus, help to further our understanding of host–microbe interactions in the D. melanogaster model.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. Hooper LV, Midtvedt T, Gordon JI (2002) How host-microbial interactions shape the nutrient environment of the mammalian intestine. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 22:283–307

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Blumberg R, Powrie F (2012) Microbiota, disease, and back to health: a metastable journey. Sci Transl Med 4: 137rv137

  3. Carding S, Verbeke K, Vipond DT, Corfe BM, Owen LJ (2015) Dysbiosis of the gut microbiota in disease. Microb. Ecol. Health Dis. 26:26191

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Khan MT, Nieuwdorp M, Backhed F (2014) Microbial modulation of insulin sensitivity. Cell Metab. 20:753–760

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Erkosar B, Leulier F (2014) Transient adult microbiota, gut homeostasis and longevity: novel insights from the drosophila model. FEBS Lett. 588:4250–4257

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Erkosar B, Storelli G, Defaye A, Leulier F (2013) Host-intestinal microbiota mutualism: "learning on the fly". Cell Host Microbe 13:8–14

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wong AC, Vanhove AS, Watnick PI (2016) The interplay between intestinal bacteria and host metabolism in health and disease: lessons from Drosophila melanogaster. Dis Model Mech 9:271–281

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lhocine N, Ribeiro PS, Buchon N, Wepf A, Wilson R, Tenev T, Lemaitre B, Gstaiger M, Meier P, Leulier F (2008) PIMS modulates immune tolerance by negatively regulating drosophila innate immune signaling. Cell Host Microbe 4:147–158

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bosco-Drayon V, Poidevin M, Boneca IG, Narbonne-Reveau K, Royet J, Charroux B (2012) Peptidoglycan sensing by the receptor PGRP-LE in the drosophila gut induces immune responses to infectious bacteria and tolerance to microbiota. Cell Host Microbe 12:153–165

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bischoff V, Vignal C, Duvic B, Boneca IG, Hoffmann JA, Royet J (2006) Downregulation of the drosophila immune response by peptidoglycan-recognition proteins SC1 and SC2. PLoS Pathog. 2:e14

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Buchon N, Broderick NA, Chakrabarti S, Lemaitre B (2009) Invasive and indigenous microbiota impact intestinal stem cell activity through multiple pathways in drosophila. Genes Dev. 23:2333–2344

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ha EM, Lee KA, Seo YY, Kim SH, Lim JH, Oh BH, Kim J, Lee WJ (2009) Coordination of multiple dual oxidase-regulatory pathways in responses to commensal and infectious microbes in drosophila gut. Nat. Immunol. 10:949–957

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Paredes JC, Welchman DP, Poidevin M, Lemaitre B (2011) Negative regulation by amidase PGRPs shapes the drosophila antibacterial response and protects the fly from innocuous infection. Immunity 35:770–779

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ryu JH, Kim SH, Lee HY, Bai JY, Nam YD, Bae JW, Lee DG, Shin SC, Ha EM, Lee WJ (2008) Innate immune homeostasis by the homeobox gene caudal and commensal-gut mutualism in drosophila. Science 319:777–782

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Guo L, Karpac J, Tran SL, Jasper H (2014) PGRP-SC2 promotes gut immune homeostasis to limit commensal dysbiosis and extend lifespan. Cell 156:109–122

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Broderick NA, Lemaitre B (2012) Gut-associated microbes of Drosophila melanogaster. Gut Microbes 3:307–321

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Shin SC, Kim SH, You H, Kim B, Kim AC, Lee KA, Yoon JH, Ryu JH, Lee WJ (2011) Drosophila microbiome modulates host developmental and metabolic homeostasis via insulin signaling. Science 334:670–674

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Storelli G, Defaye A, Erkosar B, Hols P, Royet J, Leulier F (2011) Lactobacillus plantarum promotes drosophila systemic growth by modulating hormonal signals through TOR-dependent nutrient sensing. Cell Metab. 14:403–414

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cox CR, Gilmore MS (2007) Native microbial colonization of Drosophila melanogaster and its use as a model of Enterococcus faecalis pathogenesis. Infect. Immun. 75:1565–1576

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ren C, Webster P, Finkel SE, Tower J (2007) Increased internal and external bacterial load during drosophila aging without life-span trade-off. Cell Metab. 6:144–152

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wong CN, Ng P, Douglas AE (2011) Low-diversity bacterial community in the gut of the fruitfly Drosophila melanogaster. Environ. Microbiol. 13:1889–1900

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Staubach F, Baines JF, Kunzel S, Bik EM, Petrov DA (2013) Host species and environmental effects on bacterial communities associated with drosophila in the laboratory and in the natural environment. PLoS One 8:e70749

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Wong AC, Chaston JM, Douglas AE (2013) The inconstant gut microbiota of drosophila species revealed by 16S rRNA gene analysis. ISME J 7:1922–1932

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Chandler JA, Lang JM, Bhatnagar S, Eisen JA, Kopp A (2011) Bacterial Communities of Diverse Drosophila Species: Ecological Context of a Host-Microbe Model System. Plos Genetics 7

  25. Lee HJ, Jung JY, Oh YK, Lee SS, Madsen EL, Jeon CO (2012) Comparative survey of rumen microbial communities and metabolites across one caprine and three bovine groups, using bar-coded pyrosequencing and (1)H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78:5983–5993

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Cole JR, Wang Q, Cardenas E, Fish J, Chai B, Farris RJ, Kulam-Syed-Mohideen AS, McGarrell DM, Marsh T, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM (2009) The ribosomal database project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 37:D141–D145

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Edgar RC (2010) Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26:2460–2461

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, Lesniewski RA, Oakley BB, Parks DH, Robinson CJ, Sahl JW, Stres B, Thallinger GG, Van Horn DJ, Weber CF (2009) Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:7537–7541

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Shannon CE, Weaver W (1963) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  30. Chao A (1987) Estimating the population size for capture-recapture data with unequal catchability. Biometrics 43:783–791

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L, Gevers D, Miropolsky L, Garrett WS, Huttenhower C (2011) Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 12:R60

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Bray JR, Curtis JT (1957) An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr. 27:325–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Newell PD, Chaston JM, Wang Y, Winans NJ, Sannino DR, Wong AC, Dobson AJ, Kagle J, Douglas AE (2014) In vivo function and comparative genomic analyses of the drosophila gut microbiota identify candidate symbiosis factors. Front. Microbiol. 5:576

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Broderick NA, Buchon N, Lemaitre B (2014) Microbiota-induced changes in Drosophila melanogaster host gene expression and gut morphology. MBio 5:e01117–e01114

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Newell PD, Douglas AE (2014) Interspecies interactions determine the impact of the gut microbiota on nutrient allocation in Drosophila melanogaster. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80:788–796

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Lee KA, Kim SH, Kim EK, Ha EM, You H, Kim B, Kim MJ, Kwon Y, Ryu JH, Lee WJ (2013) Bacterial-derived uracil as a modulator of mucosal immunity and gut-microbe homeostasis in drosophila. Cell 153:797–811

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center for the fly stocks used in this study. This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (Grant number: 2014R1A2A1A11052915) and by a grant from the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (Grant Number: HI14C2380).

Accession Number

The sequence data of the 16S rRNA genes from this study are publicly available in the NCBI Short Read Archive under accession no. SRP072269 (NCBI BioProject PRJNA316061).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Life Science, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, 06974, South Korea

    Gangsik Han, Hyo Jung Lee, Sang Eun Jeong, Che Ok Jeon & Seogang Hyun

Authors
  1. Gangsik Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hyo Jung Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sang Eun Jeong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Che Ok Jeon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Seogang Hyun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Che Ok Jeon or Seogang Hyun.

Additional information

Gangsik Han and Hyo Jung Lee contributed equally to this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, G., Lee, H.J., Jeong, S.E. et al. Comparative Analysis of Drosophila melanogaster Gut Microbiota with Respect to Host Strain, Sex, and Age. Microb Ecol 74, 207–216 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-016-0925-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-016-0925-3

Keywords

  • Gut microbiota
  • Drosophila melanogaster
  • 16S rRNA
  • Pyrosequencing
  • Bray-Curtis dissimilarity
  • Linear discriminant analysis coupled with effect size measurements
  • Principal component analysis