Patterns of Multi-Antibiotic-Resistant Escherichia Coli from Streams with No History of Antimicrobial Inputs
- 1.1k Downloads
A growing body of evidence suggests that contaminated environments may harbor a greater proportion of antibiotic-resistant microorganisms than unpolluted reference sites. Here, we report the screening of 427 Escherichia coli strains isolated from 11 locations on nine streams draining the US Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site against a panel of five antibiotics. Streams were chosen to capture a wide range of watersheds from minimally disturbed to highly impacted. Overall, higher levels of resistance were found in waterborne E. coli that also generally exhibited low spatial variability. However, 3 of 11 locations also demonstrated elevated resistance levels in sediments. Two of these occurred in highly disturbed tributaries with no obvious sources of antimicrobials. To further investigate these patterns, we screened a subset of isolates obtained from three streams against 23 antibiotics or antibiotic combinations. A large proportion of these isolates (>40 %) demonstrated resistance to 10 or more antimicrobials, suggesting that environmental multi-antibiotic resistance may be prevalent in this bacterial commensal. Only 4 of 87 viable isolates were tested susceptible to all 23 antibiotics and combinations. Among these multi-antibiotic-resistant isolates, several demonstrated resistance to all structural classes of antimicrobial agents tested, including frontline antibiotics such as gatifloxacin and ciprofloxacin.
KeywordsE. coli Antibiotic resistance Industrial activity
We thank Paul Stankus and Angela Lindell for technical support and advice. Financial support was provided from the US Department of Energy Financial Assistance Award no. DE-FC09-96SR18546 to the University of Georgia Research Foundation.
- 1.Allen SE, Boerlin P, Janecko N, Lumsden JS, Barker IK, Pearl DL, Reid-Smith RJ, Jardine C (2011) Antimicrobial resistance in Generic Escherichia coli isolates from wild small mammals living in swine farm, residential, landfill and natural environments in Southern Ontario, Canada. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:882–888CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Jolliffe IT (2002) Principal component analysis, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 24.Mast MA, Turk JT (1999) Environmental characteristics and water quality of hydrologic benchmark network stations in the Eastern United States, 1963–95:U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1173–A, 158 pGoogle Scholar
- 26.Neter J, Kutner M, Wasserman W, Nachtscheim C (1996) Applied linear statistical models 4th Edition. McGraw-Hill/IrwinGoogle Scholar
- 34.Schillinger JE, Gannon JJ (1985) Bacterial adsorption and suspended particles in urban storm water. Res J Water Pollut C 57:384–389Google Scholar
- 43.USEPA (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Section 9222 DGoogle Scholar
- 44.Varlik B (2013) Total maximum daily load document Times Branch SV-324 and Upper Three Runs SV-325: Escherichia coli bacteria, indicator for pathogens. Technical Report Number: 1210-13. SCDHECGoogle Scholar
- 46.Walsh F (2013) Investigating antibiotic resistance in non-clinical environments. Front Microbiol 4:1–5Google Scholar
- 48.Wellington EMH, Boxall ABA, Cross P, Feil EJ, Gaze WH, Hawkey PM, Johnson-Rollings AS, Jones DL, Lee NM, Otten W, Thomas CM, Williams AP (2013) The role of the natural environment in the emergence of antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative bacteria. Lancet: Infect Dis 13:155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar