Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Composition of Methane-Oxidizing Bacterial Communities as a Function of Nutrient Loading in the Florida Everglades

  • Soil Microbiology
  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Agricultural runoff of phosphorus (P) in the northern Florida Everglades has resulted in several ecosystem level changes, including shifts in the microbial ecology of carbon cycling, with significantly higher methane being produced in the nutrient-enriched soils. Little is, however, known of the structure and activities of methane-oxidizing bacteria (MOB) in these environments. To address this, 0 to 10 cm plant-associated soil cores were collected from nutrient-impacted (F1), transition (F4), and unimpacted (U3) areas, sectioned in 2-cm increments, and methane oxidation rates were measured. F1 soils consumed approximately two-fold higher methane than U3 soils; additionally, most probable numbers of methanotrophs were 4-log higher in F1 than U3 soils. Metabolically active MOB containing pmoA sequences were characterized by stable-isotope probing using 10 % (v/v) 13CH4. pmoA sequences, encoding the alpha subunit of methane monooxygenase and related to type I methanotrophs, were identified from both impacted and unimpacted soils. Additionally, impacted soils also harbored type II methanotrophs, which have been shown to exhibit preferences for high methane concentrations. Additionally, across all soils, novel pmoA-type sequences were also detected, indicating presence of MOB specific to the Everglades. Multivariate statistical analyses confirmed that eutrophic soils consisted of metabolically distinct MOB community that is likely driven by nutrient enrichment. This study enhances our understanding on the biological fate of methane being produced in productive wetland soils of the Florida Everglades and how nutrient-enrichment affects the composition of methanotroph bacterial communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Amaral JA, Knowles R (1995) Growth of methanotrophs in methane and oxygen counter gradients. FEMS Microbiol Lett 126:215–220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Boon P, Lee K (1997) Methane oxidation in sediments of a floodplain wetland in south-eastern Australia. Lett Appl Microbiol 25:138–142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bosse U, Frenzel P, Conrad R (1993) Inhibition of methane oxidation by ammonium in the surface layer of littoral sediment. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 13:123–134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bourne DG, McDonald IR, Murrell JC (2001) Comparison of pmoA PCR primer sets as tools for investigating methanotroph diversity in three Danish soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:3802–3809

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Castro H, Reddy KR, Ogram A (2002) Composition and function of sulfate-reducing prokaryotes in eutrophic and pristine areas of the Florida Everglades. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:6129–6137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Castro H, Newman S, Reddy KR, Ogram A (2005) Distribution and stability of sulfate reducing prokaryotic and hydrogenotrophic methanogenic assemblages in nutrient impacted regions of the Florida Everglades. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:2695–2704

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chauhan A, Ogram A (2006) Phylogeny of acetate-utilizing microorganisms in soils along a nutrient gradient in the Florida Everglades. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:6837–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chauhan A, Ogram AV, Reddy KR (2004) Novel syntrophic-methanogenic associations along a nutrient gradient in the Florida Everglades. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:3475–3484

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chauhan A, Cherrier J, Williams HN (2009) Impact of sideways and bottom up control factors on bacterial community succession over a tidal cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:4301–4306

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Costello AM, Lidstrom ME (1999) Molecular characterization of functional and phylogenetic genes from natural populations of methanotrophs in lake sediments. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 65:5066–5074

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Denman KL, Brasseur G, Chidthaisong A, Ciais P, Cox PM, Dickinson RE, Hauglustaine D, Heinze C, Holland E, Jacob D, Lohmann U, Ramachandran S, da Silva Dias PL, Wofsy SC, Zhang X (2007) Couplings between changes in the climate system and biogeochemistry. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 499–588

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dunfield PF, Khmelenina VN, Suzina NE, Trotsenko YA, Dedysh SN (2003) Methylocella silvestris sp. nov., a novel methanotroph isolated from an acidic forest cambisol. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53:1231–1239

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Escoffier S, Le Mer J, Roger PA (1997) Enumeration of methanotrophic bacteria in ricefield soils by plating and MPN techniques: a critical approach. Europ J Soil Biol 33:41–51

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hanson RS, Hanson TE (1996) Methanotrophic bacteria. Microbiol Rev 60:439–71

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Heyer J, Galchenko VF, Dunfield PF (2002) Molecular phylogeny of type II methane-oxidizing bacteria isolated from various environments. Microbiol 148:2831–2846

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. King GM (1994) Associations of methanotrophs with the roots and rhizomes of aquatic vegetation. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:3220–3227

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kolb S, Knief C, Stubner S, Conrad R (2003) Quantitative detection of methanotrophs in soil by novel pmoA-targeted real-time PCR assays. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:2423–2429

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lozupone C, Knight R (2005) UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:8228–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Magurran AE, Phillip DAT (2001) Implications of species loss in freshwater fish assemblages. Ecography 24:645–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Reddy KR, White JR, Wright A, Chua T (1999) Influence of phosphorus loading on microbial processes in the soil and water column of wetlands. In: Reddy KR, O’Connor GA, Schelske CL (eds) Phosphorus biogeochemistry in subtropical ecosystems. Lewis, New York, pp 249–273

    Google Scholar 

  22. Saitoh KI, Yagi O (2002) Development of a new most-probable-number method for enumerating methanotrophs using 48-well microtitre plates. Environ Microbiol 17:191–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Singleton DR, Powell SN, Sangaiah R, Gold A, Ball LM, Aitken MD (2005) Stable-isotope probing of bacteria capable of degrading salicylate, naphthalene, or phenanthrene in a bioreactor treating contaminated soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:1202–1209

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sorrell BK, Boon PI (2002) Convective gas flow in Eleocharis sphacelata R. Br.: methane transport and release from wetlands. Aq Bot 47:197–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Stackebrandt E, Goebel BM (1994) Taxonomic note: a place for DNA–DNA reassociation and 16 S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Bacteriol 44:846–849

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Stephen KD, Arah JRM, Daulat W, Clymo RS (1998) Root-mediated gas transport in peat determined by argon diffusion. Soil Biol Biochem 30:501–508

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The ClustalX Windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 24:4876–4882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Uz I, Chauhan A, Ogram AV (2007) Cellulolytic, fermentative, and methanogenic guilds in benthic periphyton mats from the Florida Everglades. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 61:337–347

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Vorobev AV, Baani M, Doronina NV, Brady AL, Liesack W, Dunfield PF, Dedysh SN (2011) Methyloferula stellata gen. nov., sp. nov., an acidophilic, obligately methanotrophic bacterium possessing only a soluble methane monooxygenase. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 61:2456–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Westerman P (1993) Wetland and swamp microbiology. In: Ford TE (ed) Aquatic microbiology: An ecological approach. Blackwell Scientific, Cambridge, pp 215–238

    Google Scholar 

  31. Whittenbury R, Phillips KC, Wilkinson JF (1970) Enrichment, isolation and some properties of methane-utilizing bacteria. J Gen Microbiol 61:205–218

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grants DEB-0078368 and DEB-1027053 from the National Science Foundation and partly by the Department of Defense grants W911NF-10-1-0146 and W911NF-10-R-0006. We acknowledge Dr. Sue Newman for assistance in soil sampling.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashvini Chauhan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chauhan, A., Pathak, A. & Ogram, A. Composition of Methane-Oxidizing Bacterial Communities as a Function of Nutrient Loading in the Florida Everglades. Microb Ecol 64, 750–759 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-012-0058-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-012-0058-2

Keywords

Navigation