Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Diversity of Dominant Bacterial Taxa in Activated Sludge Promotes Functional Resistance following Toxic Shock Loading

Microbial Ecology volume 61, pages 557–567 (2011)Cite this article

Abstract

Examining the relationship between biodiversity and functional stability (resistance and resilience) of activated sludge bacterial communities following disturbance is an important first step towards developing strategies for the design of robust biological wastewater treatment systems. This study investigates the relationship between functional resistance and biodiversity of dominant bacterial taxa by subjecting activated sludge samples, with different levels of biodiversity, to toxic shock loading with cupric sulfate (Cu[II]), 3,5-dichlorophenol (3,5-DCP), or 4-nitrophenol (4-NP). Respirometric batch experiments were performed to determine the functional resistance of activated sludge bacterial community to the three toxicants. Functional resistance was estimated as the 30 min IC50 or the concentration of toxicant that results in a 50% reduction in oxygen utilization rate compared to a referential state represented by a control receiving no toxicant. Biodiversity of dominant bacterial taxa was assessed using polymerase chain reaction-terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-T-RFLP) targeting the 16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) gene. Statistical analysis of 30 min IC50 values and PCR-T-RFLP data showed a significant positive correlation (P < 0.05) between functional resistance and microbial diversity for each of the three toxicants tested. To our knowledge, this is the first study showing a positive correlation between biodiversity of dominant bacterial taxa in activated sludge and functional resistance. In this system, activated sludge bacterial communities with higher biodiversity are functionally more resistant to disturbance caused by toxic shock loading.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

References

  1. Briones AM, Daugherty BJ, Angenent LT, Rausch K, Tumbleson M, Raskin L (2007) Microbial diversity and dynamics in multi- and single-compartment anaerobic bioreactors processing sulfate-rich waste streams. Environ Microbiol 9:93–106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Burmølle M, Web JS, Rao D, Hansen LH, Sørensen SJ, Kjelleberg S (2006) Enhanced biofilm formation and increased resistance to antimicrobial agents and bacterial invasion are caused by synergistic interactions in multispecies biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:3916–3923

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cook KL, Garland JL, Layton AC, Dionisi HM, Levine LH, Sayler GS (2006) Effect of microbial species richness on community stability and community function in a model plant-based wastewater processing system. Microb Ecol 52:725–737

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Crosby LD, Criddle CS (2003) Understanding bias in microbial community analysis techniques due to rrn operon copy number heterogeneity. Biotechniques 34:790–799

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Curtis TP, Head IM, Graham DW (2003) Theoretical ecology for engineering biology. Environ Sci Technol 64A–70A

  6. Curtis TP, Sloan WT (2004) Prokaryotic diversity and its limits: microbial community structure in nature and implications for microbial ecology. Curr Opin Microbiol 7:221–226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Daims H, Purkhold U, Bjerrum L, Arnold E, Wilderer PA, Wagner M (2001) Nitrification in sequencing biofilm batch reactors: lessons from molecular approaches. Water Sci Technol 43:9–18

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dalzell DJB, Alte S, Aspichueta E, de la Sota A, Etxebarria J, Gutierrez M, Hoffmann CC, Sales D, Obst U, Christofi N (2002) A comparison of five rapid direct toxicity assessment methods to determine toxicity of pollutants to activated sludge. Chemosphere 47:535–545

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dunbar J, Ticknor LO, Kuske CR (2000) Assessment of microbial diversity in four southwestern United States soils by 16S rRNA gene terminal restriction fragment analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:2943–2950

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dunbar J, Ticknor LO, Kuske CR (2001) Phylogenetic specificity and reproducibility and new method for analysis of terminal restriction fragment profiles of 16S rRNA genes from bacterial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:190–197

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Eichner CA, Erb RW, Timmis KN, Wagner-Dobler I (1999) Thermal gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of bioprotection from pollutant shocks in the activated sludge microbial community. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:102–109

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fernandez AS, Hashsham SA, Dollhope SL, Raskin L, Glagoleva O, Dazzo FB, Hickey RF, Criddle GS, Tiedje JM (2000) Flexible community structure correlates with stable community function in methanogenic bioreactor communities perturbed by glucose. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:4058–4067

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Forney LJ, Zhou X, Brown CJ (2004) Molecular microbial ecology: land of the one-eyed king. Curr Opin Microbiol 7:210–220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gentile M, Yan T, Tiquia SM, Fields MW, Nyman J, Zhou J, Criddle CS (2006) Stability in a denitrifying fluidized bed reactor. Microb Ecol 52:311–321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Girvan MS, Campbell CD, Killham K, Prosser JI, Glover LA (2005) Bacterial diversity promotes community stability and functional resilience after perturbation. Environ Microbiol 7:301–313

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Grady CPL, Daigger GT, Lim HC (eds) (1999) Biological Wastewater Treatment, 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Grady CPL, Smets BF, Barbeau DS (1996) Variability in kinetic parameter estimates: a review of possible causes and a proposed terminology. Water Res 30:742–748

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Graham DW, Smith VH (2004) Designed ecosystem services: application of ecological principles in wastewater treatment engineering. Front Ecol Environ 2:199–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Griffiths BS, Kuan HL, Ritz K, Glover LA, McCaig AE, Fenwick C (2004) The relationship between microbial community structure and functional stability, tested experimentally in an upland pasture soil. Microb Ecol 47:104–113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Griffiths BS, Ritz K, Bardgett RD, Cook R, Christensen S, Ekelund F, Sorensen SJ, Baath E, Bloem J, de Ruiter PC, Dolfing J, Nicolardot B (2000) Ecosystem response of pasture soil communities to fumigation-induced microbial diversity reductions: an examination of the biodiversity-ecosystem function relationship. Oikos 90:279–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gutierrez M, Etxebarria J, de las Fuentes L (2002) Evaluation of wastewater toxicity: comparative study between Microtox and activated sludge oxygen uptake inhibition. Water Res 36:919–924

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hashsham SA, Fernandez AS, Dollhope SL, Dazzo FB, Hickey RF, Tiedje JM, Criddle GS (2000) Parallel processing of substrate correlates with greater functional stability in mathanogenic bioreactor communities perturbed by glucose. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:4050–4057

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hughes JB, Hellmann JJ, Ricketts TH, Bohannan BJM (2001) Counting the uncountable: statistical approaches to estimating microbial diversity. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:4399–4406

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Juretschko S, Timmermann G, Schmid M, Scleifer KH, Pommerening-Roser A, Koops HP, Wagner M (1998) Combined molecular and conventional analyses of nitrifying bacterium diversity in activated sludge; Nitrosococcus mobilis and Nitrospira-like bacteria as dominant populations. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:3042–3051

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kitts CL (2001) Terminal restriction fragment patterns: a tool for comparing microbial communities and assessing community dynamics. Curr Issues Intest Microbiol 2:17–25

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. LaPara TM, Nakatsu CH, Pantea LM, Alleman JE (2002) Stability of the bacterial communities supported by a seven-stage biological process treating pharmaceutical wastewater as revealed by PCR-DGGE. Water Res 36:638–646

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu WT, Marsh TL, Cheng H, Forney LJ (1997) Characterization of microbial diversity by determining terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms of genes encoding 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:4516–4522

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P, Bengtsson J, Grime JP, Hector A, Hooper DU, Huston MA, Raffaelli D, Schmid B, Tilman D, Wardle DA (2001) Ecology: biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science 294:804–808

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Love NG, Bott CB (2000) A review and needs survey of upset early warning devices. Water Environment Research Foundation; Report No. 99-WWF-2. Alexandria, VA.

  30. Love NG, Bott CB (2002) Evaluating the role of microbial stress response mechanisms in causing biological treatment system upset. Water Sci Technol 46:11–18

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Marquardt DW (1963) An algorithm for least squares estimation of parameters. J Soc Ind Appl Math 11:431–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. McCann KS (2000) The diversity–stability debate. Nature 405:228–233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. McGrady-Steed J, Harris PM, Morin PJ (1997) Biodiversity regulates ecosystem predictability. Nature 390:162–165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Muyzer G, Smalla K (1998) Application of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TGGE) in microbial ecology. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 73:127–141

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Osborn AM, Moore ERB, Timmis KN (2000) An evaluation of terminal-restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis for the study of microbial community structure and dynamics. Environ Microbiol 2:39–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Oviedo MDC, Marquez DS, Alonso JMQ (2002) Toxic effects of metals on microbial activity in the activated sludge process. Chem Biochem Eng Q 16:139–144

    Google Scholar 

  37. Pedros-Alio C (2006) Marine microbial diversity: can it be determined? Trends Microbiol 14:257–263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Prosser JI, Bohannan BJM, Curtis TP, Ellis RJ, Firestone MK, Freckleton RP, Green JL, Green LE, Killham K, Lennon JL, Osborn MA, Solan M, van der Gast CJ, Young JP (2007) The role of ecological theory in microbial ecology. Nat Rev Microbiol 5:384–392

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Ricco G, Tomei MC, Ramadori R, Laera G (2004) Toxicity assessment of common xenobiotic compounds on municipal activated sludge: comparison between respirometry and Microtox. Water Res 38:2103–2110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Rosello-Mora R, Amann R (2001) The species concept for prokaryotes. FEMS Microbiol Rev 25:39–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Rowan AK, Snape JR, Fearnside D, Barer MR, Curtis TP, Head IM (2003) Composition and diversity of ammonia-oxidizing bacterial communities in wastewater treatment reactors of different design treating identical wastewater. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 43:195–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Saikaly PE, Oerther DB (2004) Bacterial competition in activated sludge: theoretical analysis of varying solids retention times on diversity. Microb Ecol 48:274–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Saikaly PE, Stroot PG, Oerther DB (2005) Assessing the impact of solids retention time on activated sludge bacterial diversity by 16S rRNA gene terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:5814–5822

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Schwartz MW, Brigham CA, Hoeksema JD, Lyons KG, Mills MH, van Mantgem PJ (2000) Linking biodiversity to ecosystem function: implications for conservation ecology. Oecologia 122:297–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Shannon CE, Weaver W (1963) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  46. Simpson EH (1949) Measurement of diversity. Nature 163:688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Sogin ML, Morrison HG, Huber JA, Welch DM, Huse SM, Neal PR, Arrieta JM, Herndl GJ (2006) Microbial diversity in the deep sea and the underexplored ‘rare biosphere’. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:12115–12120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Solow AR (1993) A simple test for change in community structure. J Anim Ecol 62:191–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Tilman D (1999) The ecological consequences of changes in biodiversity: a search for general principles. Ecology 80:1455–1474

    Google Scholar 

  50. Tilman D (2002) Biodiversity: population versus ecosystem stability. Ecology 77:350–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Tilman D, Knops J, Wedin D, Reich P, Ritchie M, Siemann E (1997) The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes. Science 277:1300–1302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. von Canstein H, Kelly S, Li Y, Wagner-Dobler I (2002) Species diversity improves the efficiency of mercury-reducing biofilms under changing environmental conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:2829–2837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. von Wintzingerode F, Gobel UB, Stackebrandt E (1997) Determination of microbial diversity in environmental samples: pitfalls of PCR-based rRNA analysis. FEMS Microbiol Rev 21:213–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Ward JH (1963) Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc 58:236–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Wertz S, Degrange V, Prosser JI, Poly F, Commeaux C, Freitag T, Guillaumaud N, Roux XL (2007) Decline of soil microbial diversity does not influence the resistance and resilience of key soil microbial functional groups following a model disturbance. Environ Microbiol 9:2211–2219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Wong KY, Zhang MQ, Li XM, Lo W (1997) A luminescence-based scanning respirometer for heavy metal toxicity monitoring. Biosens Bioelectron 12:125–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Brian Kinkle, Bruce Rittmann, Makram Suidan, and Jim Young for useful discussion. Financial support from the National Science Foundation to Daniel B. Oerther (BES 0238858) is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Water Desalination and Reuse Research Center, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

    Pascal E. Saikaly

  2. Division of Chemical and Life Sciences and Engineering, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia

    Pascal E. Saikaly

  3. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon

    Pascal E. Saikaly

  4. Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO, 65409, USA

    Daniel B. Oerther

  5. Environmental Research Center, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO, 65409, USA

    Daniel B. Oerther

Authors
  1. Pascal E. Saikaly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel B. Oerther
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pascal E. Saikaly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saikaly, P.E., Oerther, D.B. Diversity of Dominant Bacterial Taxa in Activated Sludge Promotes Functional Resistance following Toxic Shock Loading. Microb Ecol 61, 557–567 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-010-9783-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-010-9783-6

Keywords

search

Navigation