Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamics of Microbial Growth and Coexistence on Variably Saturated Rough Surfaces

  • Environmental Microbiology
  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The high degree of microbial diversity found in soils is attributed to the highly heterogeneous pore space and the dynamic aqueous microenvironments. Previous studies have shown that spatial and temporal variations in aqueous diffusion pathways play an important role in shaping microbial habitats and biological activity in unsaturated porous media. A new modeling framework was developed for the quantitative description of diffusion-dominated microbial interactions focusing on competitive growth of two microbial species inhabiting partially saturated rough surfaces. Surface heterogeneity was represented by patches with different porosities and water retention properties, yielding heterogeneous distribution of water contents that varies with changes in relative humidity or soil matric potential. Nutrient diffusion and microbial growth on the variably hydrated and heterogeneous surface was modeled using a hybrid method that combines a reaction diffusion method for nutrient field with individual based model for microbial growth and expansion. The model elucidated the effects of hydration dynamics and heterogeneity on nutrient fluxes and mobility affecting microbial population growth, expansion, and coexistence at the microscale. In contrast with single species dominance under wet conditions, results demonstrated prolonged coexistence of two competing species under drier conditions where nutrient diffusion and microbial movement were both limited. The uneven distribution of resources and diffusion pathways in heterogeneous surfaces highlighted the importance of position in the landscape for survival that may compensate for competitive disadvantages conferred by physiological traits. Increased motility was beneficial for expansion and survival. Temporal variations in hydration conditions resulted in fluctuations in microbial growth rate and population size. Population growth dynamics of the dominant species under wet–dry cycles were similar to growth under average value of diffusion coefficients for dry and wet conditions, respectively, suggesting that the time-averaged diffusion coefficient could serve as a useful indicator for estimation of microbial activities in a highly dynamic system such as that found in soils.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Batterman S, Padmanabham I, Milne P (1996) Effective gas-phase diffusion coefficients in soils at varying water content measured using a one-flow sorbent based technique. Environ Sci Technol 30:770–778

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Berg HC (2005) Swarming motility: it better be wet. Curr Biol 15:R599–R600

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Biondi SA, Quinn JA, Goldfine H (1998) Random motility of swimming bacteria in restricted geometries. AIChE J 44:1923–1929

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bird RB, Stewart WE, Lightfoot EN (2002) Transport phenomena. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brooks RH, Corey AT (1964) Hydraulic properties of porous media. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  6. Broseta D, Barre L, Vizika O, Shahidzadeh N, Guilbaud JP, Lyonnard S (2001) Capillary condensation in a fractal porous medium. Phys Rev Lett 86:5313–5316

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown SR (1987) A note on the description of surface-roughness using fractal dimension. Geophys Res Lett 14:1095–1098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen KC, Ford RM, Cummings PT (1998) Mathematical models for motile bacterial transport in cylindrical tubes. J Theor Biol 195:481–504

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Curtis TP, Sloan WT, Scannell JW (2002) From the cover: estimating prokaryotic diversity and its limits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:10494–10499

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Darnton NC, Turner L, Rojevsky S, Berg HC (2007) On torque and tumbling in swimming Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 189:1756–1764

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dechesne A, Or D, Gulez G, Smets BF (2008) The porous surface model, a novel experimental system for online quantitative observation of microbial processes under unsaturated conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:5195–5200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dechesne A, Or D, Smets BF (2008) Limited diffusive fluxes of substrate facilitate coexistence of two competing bacterial strains. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 64:1–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dens EJ, Van Impe JF (2000) On the importance of taking space into account when modeling microbial competition in structured food products. Math Comput Simul 53:443–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fredrickson AG, Stephanopoulos G (1981) Microbial competition. Science 213:972–979

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Harshey RM (2003) Bacterial motility on a surface: many ways to a common goal. Annu Rev Microbiol 57:249–273

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hutchinson GE (1961) The paradox of the plankton. Am Nat 95:137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kreft JU, Booth G, Wimpenny JWT (1998) Bacsim, a simulator for individual-based modelling of bacterial colony growth. Microbiology 144:3275–3287

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu HH (2004) A constitutive-relationship model for film flow on rough fracture surfaces. Hydrogeol J 12:237–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Long T, Or D (2005) Aquatic habitats and diffusion constraints affecting microbial coexistence in unsaturated porous media. Water Resour Res 41:W08408. doi:08410.01029/02004WR003796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Long T, Or D (2007) Microbial growth on partially saturated rough surfaces: simulations in idealized roughness networks. Water Resour Res 43:W02409. doi:02410.01029/02005WR004781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Moldrup P, Olesen T, Schjonning P, Yamaguchi T, Rolston DE (2000) Predicting the gas diffusion coefficient in undisturbed soil from soil water characteristics. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:94–100

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Olson MS, Ford RM, Smith JA, Fernandez EJ (2005) Analysis of column tortuosity for mncl2 and bacterial diffusion using magnetic resonance imaging. Environ Sci Technol 39:149–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Or D, Hanks RJ (1992) Soil–water and crop yield spatial variability induced by irrigation nonuniformity. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:226–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Or D, Smets BF, Wraith JM, Dechesne A, Friedman SP (2007) Physical constraints affecting bacterial habitats and activity in unsaturated porous media—a review. Adv Water Resour 30:1505–1527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Or D, Tuller M (2000) Flow in unsaturated fractured porous media: hydraulic conductivity of rough surfaces. Water Resour Res 36:1165–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT (1986) Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  27. Radlinski AP, Radlinska EZ, Agamalian M, Wignall GD, Lindner P, Randl OG (1999) Fractal geometry of rocks. Phys Rev Lett 82:3078–3081

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Reichenbach T, Mobilia M, Frey E (2007) Mobility promotes and jeopardizes biodiversity in rock–paper–scissors games. Nature 448:1046–1049

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Skopp J, Jawson MD, Doran JW (1990) Steady-state aerobic microbial activity as a function of soil water content. Soil Sci Soc Am J 54:1619–1625

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tilman D (1982) Resource competition and community structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tokunaga TK, Wan JM, Sutton SR (2000) Transient film flow on rough fracture surfaces. Water Resour Res 36:1737–1746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Torsvik V, Ovreas L (2002) Microbial diversity and function in soil: from genes to ecosystems. Curr Opin Microbiol 5:240–245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Torsvik V, Ovreas L, Thingstad TF (2002) Prokaryotic diversity–magnitude, dynamics, and controlling factors. Science 296:1064–1066

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Treves DS, Xia B, Zhou J, Tiedje JM (2003) A two-species test of the hypothesis that spatial isolation influences microbial diversity in soil. Microb Ecol 45:20–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Tuller M, Or D (2005) Water films and scaling of soil characteristic curves at low water contents. Water Resour Res 41:W09403. doi:09410.01029/02005WR004142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. van Genuchten MT (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:892–898

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zhou J, Xia B, Treves DS, Wu L-Y, Marsh TL, O'Neill RV, Palumbo AV, Tiedje JM (2002) Spatial and resource factors influencing high microbial diversity in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:326–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhou JZ, Xia BC, Huang H, Palumbo AV, Tiedje JM (2004) Microbial diversity and heterogeneity in sandy subsurface soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:1723–1734

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the partial support of BARD—US–Israel Binational Agricultural Research and Development Fund under grant US-3377-02, the National Science Foundation (Hydrologic Sciences) under grant EAR-0409364, and funding by the Swiss National Science Foundation project 200021-113442. We thank Hannes Fluhler (ETH, Zurich); Shmulik Friedman (ARO-Volcani, Israel); and Barth Smets and Arnaud Dechesne (DTU, Copenhagen) for the stimulating discussions and assistance with various aspects of this work. We sincerely appreciate numerous valuable comments and suggestions offered by the editor and three anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dani Or.

Appendix

Appendix

List of symbols

C solute concentration

C0 a constant concentration

D local aqueous diffusion coefficient

D0 solute diffusion coefficient in aqueous phase

De effective diffusion coefficient

\( \bar{D}_{\text{e}} \) temporally averaged diffusion coefficient

De,dry effective diffusion coefficient in the dry period

De,wet effective diffusion coefficient in the wet period

DS effective diffusion coefficient in the unsaturated rough surface

Ks half-saturation constant

m an empirical parameter in the van Genuchten model

N concentration of nutrient

n an empirical parameter in the van Genuchten model

R local consumption rate of nutrient

R* nutrient concentration at μ = 0

r cell motility

r radial distance

rm apparent maintenance rate at μ = 0

s substrate concentration

t variable of time

tdry duration of the dry period

twet duration of the wet period

V aqueous volume of the lattice grid

Vmax maximum specific substrate uptake rate

\( \overline{{V_{\mu } }} \) median cell volume at μ = 0

v rate of substrate uptake

x cell dry mass of the individual cell

Ymax apparent yield at μmax, corrected for maintenance

α a parameter in the van Genuchten model

ΔM 1 amount of added nutrient at the boundaries to maintain constant concentration

ΔM 2 amount of removed nutrient at the center to maintain constant concentration

Θ effective water content in the van Genuchten model

θ volumetric water content

θr residual water content

θs volumetric water content at saturation

μ specific growth rate

μmax maximum specific growth rate

ρ cell density (based on dry mass)

Φ rough surface porosity

ψm matric potential

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Long, T., Or, D. Dynamics of Microbial Growth and Coexistence on Variably Saturated Rough Surfaces. Microb Ecol 58, 262–275 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-009-9510-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-009-9510-3

Keywords

Navigation