Skip to main content
Log in

The Positive Role of the Ecological Community in the Genomic Revolution

  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The exponential increase of genomic and metagenomic data, fueled in part by recent advancements in sequencing technology, are greatly expanding our understanding of the phylogenetic diversity and metabolic capacity present in the environment. Two of the central challenges that bioinformaticians and ecologists alike must face are the design of bioinformatic resources that facilitate the analysis of genomic and metagenomic data in a comparative context and the efficient capture and organization of the plethora of descriptive information required to usefully describe these data sets. In this commentary, we review three initiatives presented in the “new frontiers” session of the second SCOPE meeting on Microbial Environmental Genomics (MicroEnGen-II, Shanghai, June 12–15, 2006). These are (1) the Integrated Microbial Genomes Resources (IMG), (2) the Genomic Standards Consortium (GSC), and (3) the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) Environmental Bioinformatics Centre (NEBC). These integrative bioinformatics and data management initiatives underscore the increasingly important role ecologists have to play in the genomic (metagenomic) revolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brazma, A, Hingamp, P, Quackenbush, J, et al. (2001) Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)—toward standards for microarray data. Nat Genet 29: 365–371

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Edwards, R (2006) Random Community Genomics.http://phage.sdsu.edu/~rob/Edwards_RCG.pdf

  3. Edwards, RA, Rodriguez-Brito, B, Wegley, L, et al. (2006) Using pyrosequencing to shed light on deep mine microbial ecology under extreme hydrogeologic conditions. BMC Genomics 7: 57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Field, D, Garrity, GM, Morrison, N, Selengut, JD, et al. (in press) Towards a richer description of genomes and metagenomes: creation of a “Minimal information about a genome sequence” specification. Nat Biotechnol

  5. Field, D, Tiwari, B, Booth, T, et al. (2006) Open source software for biologists: from famine to feast. Nat Biotechnol 24: 801–803

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Field, D, Tiwari, BJS (2005) Bioinformatics and data management support for environmental genomics. PLoS Biol 3: e297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Field, D, Tiwari, B, Snape, J (2006) Meeting report: eGenomics: genomes and the environment. Comp Funct Genomics 6: 363–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fleischmann, RD, Adams, MD, White, O, et al. (1995) Whole-genome randomsequencing and assembly of Haemophilus influenzae Rd. Science 269: 496–512

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Foerstner, KU, von Mering, C, Bork, P (2006) Comparative analysis of environmental sequences: potential and challenges. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 361: 519–523

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Liolios, K, Tavernarakis, N, Hugenholtz, P, Kyrpides, NC (2006) The genomes on line database (GOLD) v.2: a monitor of genome projects worldwide. Nucleic Acids Res 34: D332–D334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lombardot T, Kottmann R, Pfeffer H, et al. (2006) Megx.net— database resources for marine ecological genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 34: D390–D393

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Margulies, M, Egholm, M, Altman, WE, et al. (2005) Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 437: 376–380

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Markowitz, VM, Korzeniewski, F, Palaniappan, K, et al. (2006) The integrated microbial genomes (IMG) system. Nucleic Acids Res 34: D344–D348

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Markowitz, VM, Ivanova, N, Palaniappan, K, et al. (2006) An experimental metagenome data management and analysis system. Bioinformatics 22: e359–e367

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Martiny, JBH, Field, D (2005) Ecological perspectives on our complete genome collection. Ecol Lett 8: 1334–1345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Morrison, N, Wood, J, Hancock, D, et al. (2006) Annotation of environmental ‘omic data—application to the transcriptomics domain. OMICS 10: 84–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nelson, KE, Paulsen, IT, Heidelberg, JF, Fraser, CM (2000) Status of genome projects for nonpathogenic bacteria and archaea. Nat Biotechnol 18: 1049–1054

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Overbeek, R, Begley T, Butler RM, et al. (2005) Nucleic Acids Res 33(17): 5691–5702

  19. Poinar, HN, Schwarz, C, Qi, J, et al. (2006) Metagenomics to paleogenomics: large-scale sequencing of mammoth DNA. Science 311: 392–394

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shendure, J, Mitra, RD, Varma, C, Church, GM (2004) Advanced sequencing technologies: methods and goals. Nat Rev Genet 5: 335–344

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Shendure, J, Porreca, GJ, Reppas, NB, et al. (2005) Accurate multiplex polony sequencing of an evolved bacterial genome. Science 309: 1728–1732

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tiwari, B, Field, D, Snape, J (2006) Public data repositories need serious funding. Nature 439: 912

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tringe, S, von Mering, C, Kobayashi, A, Salamov, A, Chen, K, et al. (2005) Comparative metagenomics of microbial communities. Science 308: 554–557

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tyson, GW, Chapman, J, Hugenholtz, P, et al. (2004) Community structure and metabolism through reconstruction of microbial genomes from the environment. Nature 428: 37–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. van Veen, H, Kowalchuk, G (2006) Microbial Environmental Genomics: Summary Report of MicroEnGen-II (Shanghai, June 12–15, 2006).http://www.icsu-scope.org/projects/cluster2/microbial.htm

  26. Xu, J (2006) Microbial ecology in the age of genomics and metagenomics: concepts, tools, and recent advances. Mol Ecol 15: 1713–1731

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang, K, Martiny, A, Reppas, NB, et al. (2006) Sequencing genomes from single cells by polymerase cloning. Nat Biotechnol 24: 680–686

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the organizers of the MicroEnvGen II meeting for the opportunity to attend and present at this exciting workshop. NK is supported by the Department of Education’s Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research Program; the University of California, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, under contract no. W-7405-Eng-48; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory under contract no. DE-AC03-76SF00098; and Los Alamos National Laboratory under contract no. W-7405-ENG-36.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dawn Field.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Field, D., Kyrpides, N. The Positive Role of the Ecological Community in the Genomic Revolution. Microb Ecol 53, 507–511 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-007-9206-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-007-9206-5

Keywords

Navigation