Microbial Ecology

, Volume 52, Issue 1, pp 53–71 | Cite as

Picoeukaryotic Plankton Diversity at the Helgoland Time Series Site as Assessed by Three Molecular Methods

  • L. K. MedlinEmail author
  • K. Metfies
  • H. Mehl
  • Karen Wiltshire
  • K. Valentin


We analyzed picoeukaryote assemblages in the German Bight at the Helgoland time series site by sequencing cloned eukaryotic 18S rRNA genes in six genetic libraries plus one library from the Orkney Islands from a cruise of opportunity. The libraries were constructed from environmental samples collected at different periods of the year. The same samples were also analyzed using a fingerprinting technique, single-strand conformational polymorphism (SSCP), and DNA microarrays with class-level oligonucleotide probes. One hundred unique clones were analyzed from each library, thus insuring over 85% coverage of the library. The V4 region of the 18S rRNA gene was sequenced from each of these clones, thus providing the most discrimination among the clones. The nonphotosynthetic picoeukaryotic component dominated over the photosynthetic one and was represented by the ciliates at 45% and group II alveolates at 42%. Prasinophytes dominated the photosynthetic group at 40%, but other picoplankton groups, such as bolidomonads and chrysophytes, were also present. Totally novel groups were found in the cryptomonads and in the dinoflagellates. A new algal group sister to the cryptophyte nuclear gene and the glaucocystophytes was also found. These three groups have been found in other picoeukaryotic planktonic clone libraries. SSCP analyses at closer time intervals suggest that clone libraries should be made at weekly intervals if succession in the picoeukaryotic plankton community is to be monitored accurately. A comparison of annual samples suggests thatthere appears to be an annual cycle with regard to species composition. Microarray analysis supported the clone library data and offered a faster means of community analysis, which can be performed with similar accuracy and with higher throughput for a more in-depth analysis.


Clone Library German Bight SSCP Analysis Shallow Water Depth Target Nucleic Acid 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



This work was funded by the EU PICODIV project EVK3-CT199-00021.


  1. 1.
    RA Andersen, GW Saunders and MP Paskind, Ultrastructure and 18S rRNA gene sequence for Pelagomonas calceolata gen. and sp. nov. and the description of a new algal class, the Pelagophyceae classis nov. J Phycol 29 (1993) 701-715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    DA Caron, ER Peele, EL Lim and MR Dennette, Picoplankton and nanoplankton and their trophic coupling in the surface waters of the Sargasso Sea south of Bermuda. Limnol Oceanogr 44 (1999) 259-272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    B Diez, C Pedros-Alio and R Massana, Study of genetic diversity of eukaryotic picoplankton in different oceanic regions by small-subunit rRNA gene cloning and sequencing. Appl Environ Microbiol 69 (2001) 2340-2443Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G Drebes, On the life history of the marine plankton diatom Stephanopyxis palmeriana. Helgol Wiss Meeresforsch 13 (1966) 101-114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    B Edvardsen, W Eikrem and JC Green, Phylogenetic reconstructions of the Haptophyta inferred from rRNA sequences and available morphological data. Phycologia 39 (2000) 19-35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    HJ Elwood, GJ Olsen and ML Sogin, The small-subunit ribosomal RNA gene sequences from the hypotrichous ciliates Oxytricha nova and Stylonychia pustulata. Mol Biol and Evol 2 (1985) 399-410Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    RW Eppley, RW Holmes and JDH Strickland, Sinking rates of the marine phytoplankton measured with a fluorochromometer. J of Exp Mar Biol and Ecol 1 (1967) 191-208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    L Guillou, M-J Chrétiennot-Dinet and LK Medlin, Bolidomonas: a new genus with two species belonging to a new algal class, the Bolidophyceae (Heterokonta). J of Phycol 35 (1999) 368-381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    JP Huelsenbeck, F Ronquist and R Nielsen, Evolution-Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science 294 (2001) 2310-2314CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    M Kawachi, I Inouye and D Honda, The Pinguiophyceae classis nova, a new class of chromophyte algae whose members produce large amounts of omega-3 fatty acids. Phycol Res 50 (2002) 31-47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    U John, A Cembella, C Hummert, M Elbrächter, R Groben and LK Meldin, Discrimination of the toxigenic dinoflagellates Alexandrium tamarense and A. ostenfeldii in co-occurring natural populations from Scottish coastal waters. Eur J Phycol 38 (2003) 25-40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M Lange, L Guillou, D Vaulot, N Simon, RI Amann, W Ludwig and LK Medlin, Identification of the class Prymnesiophyceae and the genus Pheocystis with ribosomal RNA-target nucleic acid probes detected by flow cytometry. J Phycol 32 (1996) 858-868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    P Lopez-Garcia, F Rodriguez-Valera and C Pedros-Alio, Unexpected diversity of small eukaryotes in deep-sea Antarctic plankton. Nature 409 (2001) 603-607CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    W Ludwig, O Strunk and R Westram, ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res 25 (2004) 1363-1371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    R Massana, L Guillou and B Diez, Unveiling the organisms behind novel eukaryotic ribosomal DNA sequences from the ocean. Appl Environ Microbiol 68 (2002) 4554-4558CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    R Massana, V Balagué and L Guillou, Picoeukaryotic diversity in an oligotrophic coastal site studied by molecular and culturing approaches. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 50 (2004) 231-243CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    L Medlin, HJ Elwood and S Stickel, The characterization of enzymatically amplified eukaryotic 16S-like rRNA coding regions. Gene 71 (1988) 491-499CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ø Moestrup, Further studies of presumedly primitive green algae, including the description of Pedinophyceae class. nov. and Resultor gen. nov. J Phycol 27 (1991) 119-133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    SY Moon-van der Stay, R Wachter De and D Vaulot, Oceanic 18S rDNA sequences from picoplankton reveal unsuspected eukaryotic diversity. Nature 409 (2001) 607-610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    G Muyzer, EC Waal De and AG Uittrtlinden, Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding of the 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 59 (1993) 695-700PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    F Not, M Latasa and D Marie, Picoplanktonic Prasinophyceae abundance in the western English Channel determined by fluorescent in situ hybridization (F.I.S.H.). Appl Environ Microbiol 70 (2004) 4064-4072CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    NR Pace, A molecular view of microbial diversity and the biosphere. Science 276 (1997) 734-740CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    D Posada and KA Crandall, Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14 (1998) 817-818CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    M Rappé and S Giovannoni, Culturing the microbial majority. Annu Rev Microbiol 57 (2003) 369-394CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    K Romari and D Vaulot, Composition and temporal variability of picoeukaryote communities at a coastal site of the English Channel from 18S rDNA sequences. Limnol Oceanogr 49 (2004) 784-798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    F Schwieger and CC Tebbe, A new approach to utilize PCR-single-strand-conformation polymorphism for 16s rRNA gene-based microbial community analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 64 (1998) 4870-4876PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    N Simon, L Campbell, E Ornolfsdottir, R Groben, L Guillou, M Lange and LK Medlin, Oligonucleotide probes for the identification of three algal groups by dot blot and fluorescent whole-cell hybridization. J Eukaryot Microbiol 47 (2000) 76-84CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    DL Swofford, PAUP*, Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, Version 4.0 Beta version 8, program and documentation. Champaign, IL, USA: Illinois Natural History Survey, University of Illinois (2002).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    KH Wiltshire and C-D Dürselen, Revision and quality analysis of the Helgoland Reede long-term phytoplankton data archive. Helgol Mar Res 58 (2004) 252-268CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. K. Medlin
    • 1
    Email author
  • K. Metfies
    • 1
  • H. Mehl
    • 1
  • Karen Wiltshire
    • 2
  • K. Valentin
    • 1
  1. 1.Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine ResearchBremerhavenGermany
  2. 2.Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research Biologische Anstalt HelgolandHelgolandGermany

Personalised recommendations