Skip to main content
Log in

Image-guided abscess drainage in children with perforated appendicitis – can it wait?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Image-guided drainage is the management of choice for perforated appendicitis with intra-abdominal abscess/es. However, there is paucity of data regarding the optimal time for intervention in children.

Objective

The purpose of this study is to assess the relationship between the time from diagnosis of a drainable abscess to abscess drainage (delta time) and the clinical outcome in patients with complicated acute appendicitis.

Materials and methods

This is an institutional review board (IRB)–approved retrospective study comprising 80 pediatric patients who had image-guided abscess drainage due to perforated acute appendicitis. Delta time was associated with clinical outcome including length of stay, catheter dwell time, need for additional interventions, and need for tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA). Gamma regression models were used to assess the adjusted effect of delta time on the “length of stay” and “catheter dwell time” using “volume of the largest abscess” and “number of collections” as severity indices. Logistic regression was used to assess the effect of delta time on the “need for the t-PA” and “need for additional interventions.”

Results

Mean age (SD) was 10.2 (3.8) years. Mean time between diagnosis and intervention (delta time) was 1.5 (1.2) days. There was no evidence that delta time effects the length of stay, catheter dwell time, need for t-PA, and need for additional interventions (P > 0.05). However, there was an association between the number of collections and volume of the largest abscess with length of stay (P = 0.006; P = 0.058), catheter dwell time (P = 0.029; P < 0.001), and need for additional interventions (P = 0.029; P = 0.016).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that time between diagnosis of an appendicitis associated abscess and intervention is not significantly associated with need for tPA, need for additional intervention, drain dwell time, or length of stay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Nepomuceno H, Pearson EG (2021) Nonoperative management of appendicitis in children. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:47–47. https://doi.org/10.21037/tgh-20-191

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Pennell C, Meckmongkol T, Prasad R, Ciullo S, Arthur LG III, Lindholm E, Grewal H (2021) A standardized protocol for nonoperative management of complicated appendicitis in children reduces resource utilization. Eur J Pediatr Surg 31:014–019. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1715439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. López JJ, Deans KJ, Minneci PC (2017) Nonoperative management of appendicitis in children. Curr Opinion Pediatrics 29(3):358–362. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0000000000000487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown CV, Abrishami M, Muller M, Velmahos GC (2003) Appendiceal abscess: immediate operation or percutaneous drainage? Am Surg 69(10):829–832

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lasson A, Lundaga J, Lorén I, Nilsson PE (2002) Appendiceal abscesses: primary percutaneous drainage and selective interval appendicectomy. Eur J Surg. 168(5):264–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejs.44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fagenholz PJ, Peev MP, Thabet A, Michailidou M, Chang Y, Mueller PR, Hahn PF, Velmahos GC (2016) Abscess due to perforated appendicitis: factors associated with successful percutaneous drainage. Am J Surg 212:794–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.07.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Roach JP, Partrick DA, Bruny JL, Allshouse MJ, Karrer FM, Ziegler MM (2007) Complicated appendicitis in children: a clear role for drainage and delayed appendectomy. Am J Surg 194:769–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.08.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McCann JW, Maroo S, Wales P, Amaral JG, Krishnamurthy G, Parra D, Temple M, John P, Connolly BL (2008) Image-guided drainage of multiple intraabdominal abscesses in children with perforated appendicitis: an alternative to laparotomy. Pediatr Radiol 38:661–668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-0816-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Eysenbach LM, Caty MG, Christison-Lagay ER, Cowles RA, Dillon B, Goodman TR, Ozgediz DE, Stitelman DH, Solomon DG (2021) Outcomes following adoption of a standardized protocol for abscess drain management in pediatric appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg 56:43–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.09.050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zavras N, Vaos G (2020) Management of complicated acute appendicitis in children: still an existing controversy. World J Gastrointest Surg 12(4):129–137. https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v12.i4.129]

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Walker C, Moosavi A, Young K, Fluck M, Torres D, Widom K, Wild J (2019) Factors associated with failure of nonoperative management for complicated appendicitis. Am Surg 85(8):865–870. https://doi.org/10.1177/000313481908500840

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Abdeen N, Naz F, Linthorst R, Khan U, Dominguea PC, Koujak K, Bettoli M, Shenouda N (2019) Clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of noncontrast MRI in the evaluation of suspected appendiceal abscesses in children. J Magn Reson Imaging 49(7):241–249. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cohen HL, Tice HM, Mandel FS (1990) Ovarian volumes measured by US: bigger than we think. Radiology 177(1):189–192. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.177.1.2204964

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.F.D.E. collected and analyzed the data, interpreted the images, and drafted the initial manuscript.

R.B. performed the statistical analysis.

R.W. contributed to performing the statistical analysis.

G.S.Z. conceived and supervised the study and contributed to writing the manuscript.

All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria F. Dien Esquivel.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dien Esquivel, M.F., Belaghi, R., Webster, R. et al. Image-guided abscess drainage in children with perforated appendicitis – can it wait?. Pediatr Radiol 53, 2229–2234 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-023-05726-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-023-05726-2

Keywords

Navigation