Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Zika virus congenital microcephaly severity classification and the association of severity with neuropsychomotor development

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Zika virus infection during pregnancy is linked to birth defects, most notably microcephaly, which is associated with neurodevelopmental delays.

Objective

The goals of the study were to propose a method for severity classification of congenital microcephaly based on neuroradiologic findings of MRI scans, and to investigate the association of severity with neuropsychomotor developmental scores. We also propose a semi-automated method for MRI-based severity classification of microcephaly.

Materials and methods

We conducted a cross-sectional investigation of 42 infants born with congenital Zika infection. Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development III (Bayley-III) developmental evaluations and MRI scans were carried out at ages 13–39 months (mean: 24.8 months; standard deviation [SD]: 5.8 months). The severity score was generated based on neuroradiologist evaluations of brain malformations. Next, we established a distribution of Zika virus–microcephaly severity score including mild, moderate and severe and investigated the association of severity with neuropsychomotor developmental scores. Finally, we propose a simplified semi-automated procedure for estimating the severity score based only on volumetric measures.

Results

The results showed a correlation of r=0.89 (P<0.001) between the Zika virus–microcephaly severity score and the semi-automated method. The trimester of infection did not correlate with the semi-automated method. Neuropsychomotor development correlated with the severity classification based on the radiologic readings and semi-automated method; the more severe the imaging scores, the lower the neuropsychomotor developmental scores.

Conclusion

These severity classification methods can be used to evaluate severity of microcephaly and possible association with developmental consequences. The semi-automated methods thus provide an alternative for predicting severity of microcephaly based on only one MRI sequence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ikejezie J, Shapiro CN, Kim J et al (2017) Zika virus transmission — region of the Americas, May 15, 2015–December 15, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 66:329–334

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Marinho PES, Alvarenga PPM, Lima MT et al (2019) Central and peripheral nervous system involvement in Zika virus infection in a child. J Neurovirol 25:893–896

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Muñoz LS, Parra B, Pardo CA (2017) Neurological implications of Zika virus infection in adults. J Infect Dis 216:S897–S905

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Nascimento OJM, da Silva IRF (2017) Guillain–Barré syndrome and Zika virus outbreaks. Curr Opin Neurol 30:500–507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Calvet G, Aguiar RS, Melo ASO et al (2016) Detection and sequencing of Zika virus from amniotic fluid of fetuses with microcephaly in Brazil: a case study. Lancet Infect Dis 16:653–660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Douglas-Vail M, Su HY (2016) Zika virus. Univ West Ont Med J 85:63–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chimelli L, Melo ASO, Avvad-Portari E et al (2017) The spectrum of neuropathological changes associated with congenital Zika virus infection. Acta Neuropathol 133:983–999

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. De Fatima Vasco Aragao M, Van Der Linden V, Brainer-Lima AM et al (2016) Clinical features and neuroimaging (CT and MRI) findings in presumed Zika virus related congenital infection and microcephaly: retrospective case series study. BMJ 353:i1901

  9. Watemberg N, Silver S, Harel S, Lerman-Sagie T (2002) Significance of microcephaly among children with developmental disabilities. J Child Neurol 17:117–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Valdes V, Zorrilla CD, Gabard-Durnam L et al (2019) Cognitive development of infants exposed to the Zika virus in Puerto Rico. JAMA Netw Open 2:e1914061

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Fyfe I (2019) Severe impairment of motor function in congenital Zika syndrome. Nat Rev Neurol 15:308

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lopes Moreira ME, Nielsen-Saines K, Brasil P et al (2018) Neurodevelopment in infants exposed to Zika virus in utero. N Engl J Med 379:2377–2379

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Ministério da Saúde (2016) Zika vírus: causas, sintomas, tratamento e prevenção. [Zika virus: causes, symptoms, treatment and prevention]. http://saude.gov.br/saude-de-a-z/zika-virus. Accessed 11 Jan 2020

  14. Bayley N (2018) Escalas Bayley de desenvolvimento do bebê e da criança pequena, Terceira Edição-Bayley III [Bayley baby and toddler developmental scales, third edition]. Pearson Clinical Brasil, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  15. de Castro JDV, Pereira LP, Dias DA et al (2017) Presumed Zika virus-related congenital brain malformations: the spectrum of CT and MRI findings in fetuses and newborns. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 75:703–710

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Aragao MFVV, Holanda AC, Brainer-Lima AM et al (2017) Nonmicrocephalic infants with congenital Zika syndrome suspected only after neuroimaging evaluation compared with those with microcephaly at birth and postnatally: how large is the Zika virus “iceberg”? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 38:1427–1434

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Pires P, Jungmann P, Galvão JM et al (2018) Neuroimaging findings associated with congenital Zika virus syndrome: case series at the time of first epidemic outbreak in Pernambuco State, Brazil. Childs Nerv Syst 34:957–963

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yushkevich PA, Piven J, Hazlett HC et al (2006) User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage 31:1116–1128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. de Souza AS, de Oliveira-Szjenfeld PS, de Oliveira Melo AS et al (2018) Imaging findings in congenital Zika virus infection syndrome: an update. Childs Nerv Syst 34:85–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pool K-L, Adachi K, Karnezis S et al (2019) Association between neonatal neuroimaging and clinical outcomes in Zika-exposed infants from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. JAMA Netw Open 2:e198124

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Harbourne R, Becker K, Arpin DJ et al (2014) Improving the motor skill of children with posterior fossa syndrome. Pediatr Phys Ther 26:462–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all the participants and their families for their cooperation and participation in the study, especially for their willingness to travel long distances with their children. This study was funded by Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos (FINEP). Magda Lahorgue Nunes, Jaderson Costa da Costa and Augusto Buchweitz are supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico grants. Nathalia Bianchini Esper was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaderson Costa da Costa.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 15 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 17 kb)

ESM 3

(PNG 9615 kb)

ESM 4

(DOCX 16 kb)

ESM 5

(JPG 2434 kb)

ESM 6

(JPG 3959 kb)

ESM 7

(DOCX 25 kb)

ESM 8

(DOCX 19 kb)

ESM 9

(DOCX 20 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Esper, N.B., Franco, A.R., Soder, R.B. et al. Zika virus congenital microcephaly severity classification and the association of severity with neuropsychomotor development. Pediatr Radiol 52, 941–950 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-022-05284-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-022-05284-z

Keywords

Navigation