Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of ultrafast wave-controlled aliasing in parallel imaging (CAIPI) magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo (MP-RAGE) and standard MP-RAGE in non-sedated children: initial clinical experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Fast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences are advantageous in pediatric imaging as they can lessen child discomfort, decrease motion artifact and improve scanner availability.

Objective

To evaluate the feasibility of an ultrafast wave-CAIPI (controlled aliasing in parallel imaging) MP-RAGE (magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo) sequence for brain imaging of awake pediatric patients.

Materials and methods

Each MRI included a standard MP-RAGE sequence and an ultrafast wave-MP-RAGE sequence. Two neuroradiologists evaluated both sequences in terms of artifacts, noise, anatomical contrast and pathological contrast. A predefined 5-point scale was used by two independent pediatric neuroradiologists. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to evaluate the difference between sequences for each variable.

Results

Twenty-four patients (14 males; mean age: 11.5±4.5 years, range: 1 month to 17.8 years) were included. Wave-CAIPI MP-RAGE provided a 77% reduction in scan time using a 32-channel coil and a 70% reduction using a 20-channel coil. Visualization of the pathology, artifacts and pathological enhancement (including parenchymal, leptomeningeal and dural enhancement) was not significantly different between standard MP-RAGE and wave-CAIPI MP-RAGE (all P>0.05). For central (P<0.001) and peripheral (P<0.001) noise, and the evaluation of the anatomical structures (P<0.001), the observers favored standard MP-RAGE over wave-CAIPI MP-RAGE.

Conclusion

Ultrafast brain imaging with wave-CAIPI MP-RAGE is feasible in awake pediatric patients, providing a substantial reduction in scan time at a cost of subjectively increased image noise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sasaki M, Inoue T, Tohyama K et al (2003) High-field MRI of the central nervous system: current approaches to clinical and microscopic imaging. Magn Reson Med Sci 2:133–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fushimi Y, Miki Y, Urayama S-I et al (2007) Gray matter-white matter contrast on spin-echo T1-weighted images at 3 T and 1.5 T: a quantitative comparison study. Eur Radiol 17:2921–2925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mugler JP 3rd, Brookeman JR (1990) Three-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid gradient- echo imaging (3D MP RAGE). Magn Reson Med 15:152–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sodickson DK, Manning WJ (1997) Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays. Magn Reson Med 38:591–603

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P (1999) SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 42:952–962

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM et al (2002) Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 47:1202–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wharton S, Bowtell R (2012) Fiber orientation-dependent white matter contrast in gradient echo MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:18559–18564

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Haacke E, Tang J, Neelavalli J, Cheng YCN (2010) Susceptibility mapping as a means to visualize veins and quantify oxygen saturation. J Magn Reson Imaging 32:663–676

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bilgic B, Gagoski BA, Cauley SF et al (2015) Wave-CAIPI for highly accelerated 3D imaging. Magn Reson Med 73:2152–2162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Setsompop K, Feinberg DA, Polimeni JR (2016) Rapid brain MRI acquisition techniques at ultra-high fields. NMR Biomed 29:1198–1221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Polak D, Setsompop K, Cauley SF et al (2018) Wave-CAIPI for highly accelerated MP-RAGE imaging. Magn Reson Med 79:401–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guérin B, Stockmann JP, Baboli M et al (2016) Robust time-shifted spoke pulse design in the presence of large B0 variations with simultaneous reduction of through-plane dephasing, B1+ effects, and the specific absorption rate using parallel transmission. Magn Reson Med 76:540–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Goncalves Filho ALM, Conklin J, Longo MGF et al (2020) Accelerated post-contrast wave-CAIPI T1 SPACE achieves equivalent diagnostic performance compared with standard T1 SPACE for the detection of brain metastases in clinical 3T MRI. Front Neurol 11:587327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dietrich O, Raya JG, Reeder SB et al (2007) Measurement of signal-to-noise ratios in MR images: influence of multichannel coils, parallel imaging, and reconstruction filters. J Magn Reson Imaging 26:375–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Danieli L, Riccitelli GC, Distefano D et al (2019) Brain tumor-enhancement visualization and morphometric assessment: a comparison of MPRAGE, SPACE, and VIBE MRI techniques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 40:1140–1148

  16. Afacan O, Erem B, Roby DP et al (2016) Evaluation of motion and its effect on brain magnetic resonance image quality in children. Pediatr Radiol 46:1728–1735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bjur KA, Payne ET, Nemergut ME et al (2017) Anesthetic-related neurotoxicity and neuroimaging in children: a call for conversation. J Child Neurol 32:594–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kamat PP, Kudchadkar SR, Simon HK (2019) Sedative and anesthetic neurotoxicity in infants and young children: not just an operating room concern. J Pediatr 204:285–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schmid W, Marhofer P, Opfermann P et al (2020) Brainwave entrainment to minimise sedative drug doses in paediatric surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Anaesth 125:330–335

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Polak D, Cauley S, Huang SY et al (2019) Highly-accelerated volumetric brain examination using optimized wave-CAIPI encoding. J Magn Reson Imaging 50:961–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kozak BM, Jaimes C, Kirsch J, Gee MS (2020) MRI techniques to decrease imaging times in children. Radiographics 40:485–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Woodfield J, Kealey S (2015) Magnetic resonance imaging acquisition techniques intended to decrease movement artefact in paediatric brain imaging: a systematic review. Pediatr Radiol 45:1271–1281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jaimes C, Gee MS (2016) Strategies to minimize sedation in pediatric body magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Radiol 46:916–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Eun D-I, Jang R, Ha WS et al (2020) Deep-learning-based image quality enhancement of compressed sensing magnetic resonance imaging of vessel wall: comparison of self-supervised and unsupervised approaches. Sci Rep 10:13950

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors Azadeh Tabari and John Conklin contributed equally.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Azadeh Tabari.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tabari, A., Conklin, J., Figueiro Longo, M.G. et al. Comparison of ultrafast wave-controlled aliasing in parallel imaging (CAIPI) magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo (MP-RAGE) and standard MP-RAGE in non-sedated children: initial clinical experience. Pediatr Radiol 51, 2009–2017 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-021-05117-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-021-05117-5

Keywords

Navigation