Prospective pediatric study comparing glomerular filtration rate estimates based on motion-robust dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and serum creatinine (eGFR) to 99mTc DTPA

A Correction to this article is available

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

Current methods to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) have shortcomings. Estimates based on serum creatinine are known to be inaccurate in the chronically ill and during acute changes in renal function. Gold standard methods such as inulin and 99mTc diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA) require blood or urine sampling and thus can be difficult to perform in children. Motion-robust radial volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI represents a novel tool for estimating GFR that has not been validated in children.

Objective

The purpose of our study was to determine the feasibility and accuracy of GFR measured by motion-robust radial VIBE dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI compared to estimates by serum creatinine (eGFR) and 99mTc DTPA in children.

Materials and methods

We enrolled children, 0–18 years of age, who were undergoing both a contrast-enhanced MRI and nuclear medicine 99mTc DTPA glomerular filtration rate (NM-GFR) within 2 weeks of each other. Enrolled children consented to an additional 6-min dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI scan using the motion-robust high spatiotemporal resolution prototype dynamic radial VIBE sequence (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) at 3 tesla (T). The images were reconstructed offline with high temporal resolution (~3 s/volume) using compressed sensing image reconstruction including regularization in temporal dimension to improve image quality and reduce streaking artifacts. Images were then automatically post-processed using in-house-developed software. Post-processing steps included automatic segmentation of kidney parenchyma and aorta using convolutional neural network techniques and tracer kinetic model fitting using the Sourbron two-compartment model to calculate the MR-based GFR (MR-GFR). The NM-GFR was compared to MR-GFR and estimated GFR based on serum creatinine (eGFR) using Pearson correlation coefficient and Bland–Altman analysis.

Results

Twenty-one children (7 female, 14 male) were enrolled between February 2017 and May 2018. Data from six of these children were not further analyzed because of deviations from the MRI protocol. Fifteen patients were analyzed (5 female, 10 male; average age 5.9 years); the method was technically feasible in all children. The results showed that the MR-GFR correlated with NM-GFR with a Pearson correlation coefficient (r-value) of 0.98. Bland–Altman analysis (i.e. difference of MR-GFR and NM-GFR versus mean of NM-GFR and MR-GFR) showed a mean difference of −0.32 and reproducibility coefficient of 18 with 95% confidence interval, and the coefficient of variation of 6.7% with values between −19 (−1.96 standard deviation) and 18 (+1.96 standard deviation). In contrast, serum creatinine compared with NM-GFR yielded an r-value of 0.73. Bland–Altman analysis (i.e. difference of eGFR and NM-GFR versus mean of NM-GFR and eGFR) showed a mean difference of 2.9 and reproducibility coefficient of 70 with 95% confidence interval, and the coefficient of variation of 25% with values between −67 (−1.96 standard deviation) and 73 (+1.96 standard deviation).

Conclusion

MR-GFR is a technically feasible and reliable method of measuring GFR when compared to the reference standard, NM-GFR by serum 99mTc DTPA, and MR-GFR is more reliable than estimates based on serum creatinine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Change history

  • 13 March 2020

    The originally published version of this article contained a typographical error. In the text under the subheading “Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI method, post-processing, and MR-GFR calculation” and in Table 1 the intravenous injection rate of gadobutrol was incorrectly listed as 0.2 mL/s.

References

  1. 1.

    Shemesh O, Golbetz H, Kriss JP, Myers BD (1985) Limitations of creatinine as a filtration marker in glomerulopathic patients. Kidney Int 28:830–838

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Schwartz GJ, Work DF (2009) Measurement and estimation of GFR in children and adolescents. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 4:1832–1843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Stevens LA, Levey AS (2009) Measured GFR as a confirmatory test for estimated GFR. J Am Soc Nephrol 20:2305–2313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kainer G, McIlveen B, Höschl R, Rosenberg AR (1979) Assessment of individual renal function in children using 99mTc-DTPA. Arch Dis Child 54:931–936

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ledneva E, Karie S, Launay-Vacher V et al (2009) Renal safety of gadolinium-based contrast media in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. Radiology 250:618–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hackstein N, Heckrodt J, Rau WS (2003) Measurement of single-kidney glomerular filtration rate using a contrast-enhanced dynamic gradient-echo sequence and the Rutland-Patlak plot technique. J Magn Reson Imaging 18:714–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Annet L, Hermoye L, Peeters F et al (2004) Glomerular filtration rate: assessment with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and a cortical-compartment model in the rabbit kidney. J Magn Reson Imaging 20:843–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Buckley DL, Shurrab AE, Cheung CM et al (2006) Measurement of single kidney function using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: comparison of two models in human subjects. J Magn Reson Imaging 24:1117–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Lee VS, Rusinek H, Bokacheva L et al (2007) Renal function measurements from MR renography and a simplified multicompartmental model. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 292:F1548–F1589

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Sourbron SP, Michaely HJ, Reiser MF, Schoenberg SO (2008) MRI-measurement of perfusion and glomerular filtration in the human kidney with a separable compartment model. Investig Radiol 43:40–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Zhang JL, Rusinek H, Bokacheva L et al (2008) Functional assessment of the kidney from magnetic resonance and computed tomography renography: impulse retention approach to a multicompartment model. Magn Reson Med 59:278–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Bokacheva L, Rusinek H, Zhang JL et al (2009) Estimates of glomerular filtration rate from MR renography and tracer kinetic models. J Magn Reson Imaging 29:371–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Tofts PS, Cutajar M, Mendichovszky IA et al (2012) Precise measurement of renal filtration and vascular parameters using a two-compartment model for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the kidney gives realistic normal values. Eur Radiol 22:1320–1330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Chandarana H, Block TK, Rosenkrantz AB et al (2011) Free-breathing radial 3D fat-suppressed T1-weighted gradient echo sequence: a viable alternative for contrast-enhanced liver imaging in patients unable to suspend respiration. Investig Radiol 46:648–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kurugol S (2017) Reliable estimation of kidney filtration rate with DCE-MRI using motion-robust high spatiotemporal resolution radial VIBE. In: Proceedings of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance Medicine, Wiley, Hoboken

  16. 16.

    Coll-Font J, Afacan O, Chow JS et al (2019) Bulk motion-compensated DCE-MRI for functional imaging of kidneys in newborns. J Magn Reson Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27021

  17. 17.

    Feng L, Grimm R, Block KT et al (2013) Golden-angle radial sparse parallel MRI: combination of compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and golden-angle radial sampling for fast and flexible dynamic volumetric MRI. Magn Reson Med 72:707–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Haghighi M, Warfield SK, Kurugol S (2018) Automatic renal segmentation in DCE-MRI using convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, IEEE, Piscataway, pp 1534–1537

  19. 19.

    Jégou S, Drozdzal M, Vazquez D et al (2016) The one hundred layers tiramisu: fully convolutional DenseNets for semantic segmentation. http://arxiv.org/abs/1611.09326. Accessed 20 Dec 2019

  20. 20.

    Li X, Bolan PJ, Ugurbil K, Metzger GJ (2015) Measuring renal tissue relaxation times at 7 T. NMR Biomed 28:63–69

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Lu H, Clingman C, Golay X, Van Zijl PC (2004) Determining the longitudinal relaxation time (T1) of blood at 3.0 tesla. Magn Reson Med 52:679–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Chen Y, Lee GR, Aandal G et al (2016) Rapid volumetric T1 mapping of the abdomen using three-dimensional through-time spiral GRAPPA. Magn Reson Med 75:1457–1465

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Eikefjord E, Andersen E, Hodneland E et al (2017) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI measurement of renal function in healthy participants. Acta Radiol 58:748–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Vivier P-H, Storey P, Rusinek H et al (2011) Kidney function: glomerular filtration rate measurement with MR renography in patients with cirrhosis. Radiology 259:462–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Kang SK, Huang WC, Wong S et al (2013) Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging measurement of renal function in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy: preliminary experience. Investig Radiol 48:687–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Tipirneni-Sajja A, Loeffler RB, Oesingmann N et al (2016) Measurement of glomerular filtration rate by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using a subject-specific two-compartment model. Physiol Rep 4

  27. 27.

    Taton B, De La Faille R, Asselineau J et al (2019) A prospective comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and 51Cr-EDTA clearance for glomerular filtration rate measurement in 42 kidney transplant recipients. Eur J Radiol 117:209–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Lim SW, Chrysochou C, Buckley DL et al (2013) Prediction and assessment of responses to renal artery revascularization with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a pilot study. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 305:F672–F678

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Eikefjord E, Andersen E, Hodneland E et al (2016) Quantification of single-kidney function and volume in living kidney donors using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 207:1022–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Kwatra NS, Meany HJ, Ghelani SJ et al (2017) Glomerular hyperfiltration in children with cancer: prevalence and a hypothesis. Pediatr Radiol 47:221–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Frush DP, Donnelly LF, Rosen NS (2003) Computed tomography and radiation risks: what pediatric health care providers should know. Pediatrics 112:951–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This investigation was supported in part by a 2018 Boston Children’s Hospital Translational Research Program Pilot Grant, a 2019 Society for Pediatric Radiology Multi-Institutional Pilot Research Award, the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation of America Career Development Award, a 2018 American Gastroenterological Association-Boston Scientific Technology and Innovation Award, and following grants from the National Institutes of Health: NIBIB R01 EB019483-04; NIDDK R01DK1004-04. The authors would like to thank Rhonda Johnson and Fredrick Fahey for their contributions.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sila Kurugol.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Alto Stemmer is an employee of Siemens Healthcare.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kurugol, S., Afacan, O., Lee, R.S. et al. Prospective pediatric study comparing glomerular filtration rate estimates based on motion-robust dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and serum creatinine (eGFR) to 99mTc DTPA. Pediatr Radiol 50, 698–705 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-020-04617-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • 99mTc diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid
  • Children
  • Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
  • Glomerular filtration rate
  • Kidneys
  • Nuclear medicine
  • Renal function
  • Serum creatinine