Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Placental magnetic resonance imaging Part I: the normal placenta

  • Pictorial Essay
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mounting evidence suggests that the placenta is involved in nearly all abnormalities of pregnancy and fetal development. Traditional imaging evaluation of the placenta by ultrasound has more recently been complemented by MRI for complex cases requiring additional information, such as in the diagnosis of the placenta accreta spectrum (placenta accreta, increta and percreta). MRI can often help delineate the safest approach to delivery and adds diagnostic certainty to enable prognostication and to avoid potentially lethal complications. Increasingly, prenatal MRI has become the purview of the pediatric imager and is becoming the standard of care for select gestational indications. However, placental MRI might be unfamiliar to the radiologist. Thus, we provide a simple and systematic approach to evaluating the placenta by MRI, to enable delivery planning and family counseling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Jauniaux E, Ayres-de-Campos D (2018) FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: introduction. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 140:261–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Guttmacher AE, Maddox YT, Spong CY (2014) The human placenta project: placental structure, development, and function in real time. Placenta 35:303–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dwyer BK, Belogolovkin V, Tran L et al (2008) Prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta: sonography or magnetic resonance imaging? J Ultrasound Med 27:1275–1281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Warshak CR, Eskander R, Hull AD et al (2006) Accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol 108:573–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Oppenheimer DC, Mazaheri P, Ballard DH et al (2018) Magnetic resonance imaging of the placenta and gravid uterus: a pictorial essay. Abdom Radiol 44:669–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Allen BC, Leyendecker JR (2013) Placental evaluation with magnetic resonance. Radiol Clin North Am 51:955–966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Knight JC, Lehnert S, Shanks AL et al (2018) A comprehensive severity score for the morbidly adherent placenta: combining ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Radiol 48:1945–1954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jauniaux E, Ayres-de-Campos D, Langhoff-Roos J et al (2019) FIGO classification for the clinical diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum disorders. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 146:20–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jauniaux E, Bhide A, Kennedy A et al (2018) FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: prenatal diagnosis and screening. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 140:274–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jauniaux E, Chantraine F, Silver RM, Langhoff-Roos J (2018) FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: epidemiology. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 140:265–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sentilhes L, Kayem G, Chandraharan E et al (2018) FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: conservative management. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 140:291–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yen CJ, Mehollin-Ray AR, Bernardo F et al (2018) Correlation between maternal meal and fetal motion during fetal MRI. Pediatr Radiol 49:46–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kanal E, Borgstede JP, Barkovich AJ et al (2004) American College of Radiology white paper on MR safety: 2004 update and revisions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:1111–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. McDonald RJ, McDonald JS, Kallmes DF et al (2015) Intracranial gadolinium deposition after contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 275:772–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Millischer AE, Deloison B, Silvera S et al (2017) Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the placenta: a tool for prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta? Placenta 53:40–47

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Reddy UM, Abuhamad AZ, Levine D et al (2014) Fetal imaging: executive summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Radiology, Society for Pediatric Radiology, and Society of Radiologists in ultrasound fetal imaging workshop. Am J Obstet Gynecol 210:387–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dashe JS, McIntire DD, Ramus RM et al (2002) Persistence of placenta previa according to gestational age at ultrasound detection. Obstet Gynecol 99:692–697

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kilcoyne A, Shenoy-Bhangle AS, Roberts DJ et al (2017) MRI of placenta accreta, placenta increta, and placenta percreta: pearls and pitfalls. AJR Am J Roentgenol 208:214–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Elsayes KM, Trout AT, Friedkin AM et al (2009) Imaging of the placenta: a multimodality pictorial review. Radiographics 29:1371–1391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Baughman WC, Corteville JE, Shah RR (2008) Placenta accreta: spectrum of US and MR imaging findings. Radiographics 28:1905–1916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Grannum PA, Berkowitz RL, Hobbins JC (1979) The ultrasonic changes in the maturing placenta and their relation to fetal pulmonic maturity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 133:915–922

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Horowitz JM, Berggruen S, McCarthy RJ et al (2015) When timing is everything: are placental MRI examinations performed before 24 weeks' gestational age reliable? AJR Am J Roentgenol 205:685–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mariana L. Meyers.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

CME activity

This article has been selected as the CME activity for the current month. Please visit the SPR website at www.pedrad.org on the Education page and follow the instructions for complete this CME activity.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meyers, M.L., Brown, B.P. Placental magnetic resonance imaging Part I: the normal placenta. Pediatr Radiol 50, 264–274 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04520-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04520-3

Keywords

Navigation