Abstract
Background
Bone age determination is usually employed to evaluate growth disorders and their treatment. The Greulich-Pyle method is the simplest and most frequently used type of evaluation, but it presents huge interobserver variability. The BoneXpert is a computer-automated method developed to avoid significant bone age variability among distinct observers.
Objective
To compare the BoneXpert and Greulich-Pyle methods of bone age determination in eutrophic children and adolescents, as well as in overweight and obese pediatric patients.
Materials and methods
The sample comprised 515 participants, 253 boys (159 eutrophic, 53 overweight and 41 obese) and 262 girls (146 eutrophic, 76 overweight and 40 obese). Left hand and wrist radiographs were acquired for bone age determination using both methods.
Results
There was a positive correlation between chronological age and Greulich-Pyle, chronological age and BoneXpert, and Greulich-Pyle and BoneXpert. There was a significant increase (P<0.05) in bone age in both the Greulich-Pyle and BoneXpert methods in obese boys when compared to eutrophic or overweight boys of the same age. In girls, there was an increase in bone age in both obese and overweight individuals when compared to eutrophic girls (P<0.05). The Greulich-Pyle bone age was advanced in comparison to that of BoneXpert in all groups, except in obese boys, in which bone age was similarly advanced in both methods.
Conclusion
The BoneXpert computer-automated bone age determination method showed a significant positive correlation with chronological age and Greulich-Pyle. Furthermore, the impact of being overweight or obese on bone age could be identified by both methods.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, IBGE (2010) Pesquisa de Orçamentos familiares 2008–2009: antropometria e estado nutricional de crianças, adolescentes e adultos no Brasil.[Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics Report of the Familial Income Anthropometry and Nutritional Status of Children, Adolescents and Adults in Brazil]. Available from http://www.IBGE.gov.br
Manzoor Mughal A, Hassan N, Ahmed A (2014) Bone age assessment methods: a critical review. Pak J Med Sci 30:211–215
Greulich WW, Pyle SI (1959) Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist, 2nd edn. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Sanctis V, Maio S, Soliman A et al (2014) Hand X-ray in pediatric endocrinology: skeletal age assessment and beyond. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 18:S63–S71
Bull RK, Edwards PD, Kemp PM et al (1999) Bone age assessment: a large scale comparison of the Greulich and Pyle, and Tanner and Whitehouse (TW2) methods. Arch Dis Child 81:172–173
Thodberg HH (2009) Clinical review: an automated method for determination of bone age. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:2239–2244
Mansourvar M, Ismail MA, Herawan T et al (2013) Automated bone age assessment: motivation, taxonomies, and challenges. Comput Math Methods Med 2013:391626
Thodberg HH, Kreiborg S, Juul A, Pedersen KD (2009) The BoneXpert method for automated determination of skeletal maturity. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 28:52–66
Zhang S, Liu G, Ma CG et al (2013) Automated determination of bone age in a modern Chinese population. ISRN Radiol 2013:874570
Thodberg HH, Savendahl L (2010) Validation and reference values of automated bone age determination for four ethnicities. Acad Radiol 17:1425–1432
Martin DD, Heil K, Heckmann C et al (2013) Validation of automatic bone age determination in children with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Pediatr Radiol 43:1615–1621
Anink J, Nusman CM, van Suijlekom-Smit LW et al (2014) Automated determination of bone age and bone mineral density in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a feasibility study. Arthritis Res Ther 16:424
Martin DD, Meister K, Schweizer R et al (2011) Validation of automatic bone age rating in children with precocious and early puberty. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 24:1009–1014
De Onis M, Onyango AW, Borghi E et al (2007) Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents. Bull World Health Organ 85:660–667
Vandewalle S, Taes Y, Fiers T et al (2014) Sex steroids in relation to sexual and skeletal maturation in obese male adolescents. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99:2977–2985
de Groot CJ, van den Berg A, Ballieux BEPB et al (2017) Determinants of advanced bone age in childhood obesity. Horm Res Paediatr 87:254–263
Sopher AB, Jean AM, Zwany SK et al (2011) Bone age advancement in prepubertal children with obesity and premature adrenarche: possible potentiating factors. Obesity (Silver Spring) 19:1259–1264
Kim SE, Jang JW, Ahn MB et al (2017) The association between skeletal maturation and adrenal androgen levels in obese children and adolescents. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 22:108–114
Martin DD, Wit JM, Hochberg Z et al (2011) The use of bone age in clinical practice - part 1. Horm Res Paediatr 76:1–9
Acknowledgements
This work was supported with the research grant program from Fundo de Amparo à Pesquisa – Santa Casa de Sao Paulo School of Medical Sciences. We thank Dr. Hans Henrik Thodberg for technical support related to BoneXpert technology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
None
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Artioli, T.O., Alvares, M.A., Carvalho Macedo, V.S. et al. Bone age determination in eutrophic, overweight and obese Brazilian children and adolescents: a comparison between computerized BoneXpert and Greulich-Pyle methods. Pediatr Radiol 49, 1185–1191 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04435-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04435-z