Skip to main content
Log in

Bone age determination in eutrophic, overweight and obese Brazilian children and adolescents: a comparison between computerized BoneXpert and Greulich-Pyle methods

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Bone age determination is usually employed to evaluate growth disorders and their treatment. The Greulich-Pyle method is the simplest and most frequently used type of evaluation, but it presents huge interobserver variability. The BoneXpert is a computer-automated method developed to avoid significant bone age variability among distinct observers.

Objective

To compare the BoneXpert and Greulich-Pyle methods of bone age determination in eutrophic children and adolescents, as well as in overweight and obese pediatric patients.

Materials and methods

The sample comprised 515 participants, 253 boys (159 eutrophic, 53 overweight and 41 obese) and 262 girls (146 eutrophic, 76 overweight and 40 obese). Left hand and wrist radiographs were acquired for bone age determination using both methods.

Results

There was a positive correlation between chronological age and Greulich-Pyle, chronological age and BoneXpert, and Greulich-Pyle and BoneXpert. There was a significant increase (P<0.05) in bone age in both the Greulich-Pyle and BoneXpert methods in obese boys when compared to eutrophic or overweight boys of the same age. In girls, there was an increase in bone age in both obese and overweight individuals when compared to eutrophic girls (P<0.05). The Greulich-Pyle bone age was advanced in comparison to that of BoneXpert in all groups, except in obese boys, in which bone age was similarly advanced in both methods.

Conclusion

The BoneXpert computer-automated bone age determination method showed a significant positive correlation with chronological age and Greulich-Pyle. Furthermore, the impact of being overweight or obese on bone age could be identified by both methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, IBGE (2010) Pesquisa de Orçamentos familiares 2008–2009: antropometria e estado nutricional de crianças, adolescentes e adultos no Brasil.[Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics Report of the Familial Income Anthropometry and Nutritional Status of Children, Adolescents and Adults in Brazil]. Available from http://www.IBGE.gov.br

  2. Manzoor Mughal A, Hassan N, Ahmed A (2014) Bone age assessment methods: a critical review. Pak J Med Sci 30:211–215

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Greulich WW, Pyle SI (1959) Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist, 2nd edn. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Sanctis V, Maio S, Soliman A et al (2014) Hand X-ray in pediatric endocrinology: skeletal age assessment and beyond. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 18:S63–S71

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bull RK, Edwards PD, Kemp PM et al (1999) Bone age assessment: a large scale comparison of the Greulich and Pyle, and Tanner and Whitehouse (TW2) methods. Arch Dis Child 81:172–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Thodberg HH (2009) Clinical review: an automated method for determination of bone age. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:2239–2244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mansourvar M, Ismail MA, Herawan T et al (2013) Automated bone age assessment: motivation, taxonomies, and challenges. Comput Math Methods Med 2013:391626

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Thodberg HH, Kreiborg S, Juul A, Pedersen KD (2009) The BoneXpert method for automated determination of skeletal maturity. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 28:52–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang S, Liu G, Ma CG et al (2013) Automated determination of bone age in a modern Chinese population. ISRN Radiol 2013:874570

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Thodberg HH, Savendahl L (2010) Validation and reference values of automated bone age determination for four ethnicities. Acad Radiol 17:1425–1432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Martin DD, Heil K, Heckmann C et al (2013) Validation of automatic bone age determination in children with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Pediatr Radiol 43:1615–1621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Anink J, Nusman CM, van Suijlekom-Smit LW et al (2014) Automated determination of bone age and bone mineral density in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a feasibility study. Arthritis Res Ther 16:424

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Martin DD, Meister K, Schweizer R et al (2011) Validation of automatic bone age rating in children with precocious and early puberty. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 24:1009–1014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. De Onis M, Onyango AW, Borghi E et al (2007) Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents. Bull World Health Organ 85:660–667

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Vandewalle S, Taes Y, Fiers T et al (2014) Sex steroids in relation to sexual and skeletal maturation in obese male adolescents. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99:2977–2985

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. de Groot CJ, van den Berg A, Ballieux BEPB et al (2017) Determinants of advanced bone age in childhood obesity. Horm Res Paediatr 87:254–263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sopher AB, Jean AM, Zwany SK et al (2011) Bone age advancement in prepubertal children with obesity and premature adrenarche: possible potentiating factors. Obesity (Silver Spring) 19:1259–1264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim SE, Jang JW, Ahn MB et al (2017) The association between skeletal maturation and adrenal androgen levels in obese children and adolescents. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 22:108–114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Martin DD, Wit JM, Hochberg Z et al (2011) The use of bone age in clinical practice - part 1. Horm Res Paediatr 76:1–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported with the research grant program from Fundo de Amparo à Pesquisa – Santa Casa de Sao Paulo School of Medical Sciences. We thank Dr. Hans Henrik Thodberg for technical support related to BoneXpert technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos A. Longui.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Artioli, T.O., Alvares, M.A., Carvalho Macedo, V.S. et al. Bone age determination in eutrophic, overweight and obese Brazilian children and adolescents: a comparison between computerized BoneXpert and Greulich-Pyle methods. Pediatr Radiol 49, 1185–1191 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04435-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04435-z

Keywords

Navigation