Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Characterisation of computed tomography angiography findings in paediatric patients with heterotaxy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Heterotaxy refers to the abnormal arrangement of organs across the left–right axis and is typically associated with complex cardiovascular malformations.

Objective

To characterise the range of cardiac and extracardiac CT angiography findings in children with heterotaxy using the latest nomenclature consensus and to compare the different types of isomerism.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively analysed the data of 64 consecutive paediatric patients referred to our tertiary paediatric cardiovascular centre who underwent CT angiography for the evaluation of known or suspected heterotaxy within a 52-month period.

Results

Right atrial isomerism was identified in 44 (69%) children, while left atrial isomerism was identified in 18 (28%) children. Atrial appendage anatomy and situs could not be determined in 2 children (3%). Associated heart defects included complete atrioventricular canal (CAVC) in 51 (80%) children, total anomalous pulmonary venous return in 43 (67%) and pulmonary atresia in 23 (36%). The bronchial branching pattern corresponded to atrial appendage morphology in all children except in the two in whom atrial appendage morphology could not be defined. In children with right atrial isomerism, the most common associated abnormalities were CAVC (n=41, 93%) and asplenia (n=34, 77%), while in those with left atrial isomerism, the most common associated abnormalities were polysplenia (n=17, 94%) and an interrupted inferior vena cava with azygos continuation (n=15, 83%).

Conclusion

CT angiography provides useful cardiovascular and extracardiac data on heterotaxy, which frequently involves a pattern of side-related findings but has great anatomical variability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balan A, Lazoura O, Padley SP et al (2012) Atrial isomerism: a pictorial review. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 6:127–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jacobs JP, Anderson RH, Weinberg PM et al (2007) The nomenclature, definition and classification of cardiac structures in the setting of heterotaxy. Cardiol Young 17:1–28

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hong YK, Park YW, Ryu SJ et al (2000) Efficacy of MRI in complicated congenital heart disease with visceral heterotaxy syndrome. J Comput Assist Tomogr 24:671–682

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhu L, Belmont JW, Ware SM (2006) Genetics of human heterotaxias. Eur J Hum Genet 14:17–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ticho BS, Goldstein AM, Van Praagh R (2000) Extracardiac anomalies in the heterotaxy syndromes with focus on anomalies of midline-associated structures. Am J Cardiol 85:729–734

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sutherland MJ, Ware SM (2009) Disorders of left-right asymmetry: heterotaxy and situs inversus. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 151c:307–317

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Burton EC, Olson M, Rooper L (2014) Defects in laterality with emphasis on heterotaxy syndromes with asplenia and polysplenia: an autopsy case series at a single institution. Pediatr Dev Pathol 17:250–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Han BK, Overman DM, Grant K et al (2013) Non-sedated, free breathing cardiac CT for evaluation of complex congenital heart disease in neonates. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 7:354–360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zucker EJ, Koning JL, Lee EY (2017) Cyanotic congenital heart disease: essential primer for the practicing radiologist. Radiol Clin North Am 55:693–716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Malik A, Hellinger JC, Servaes S et al (2017) Prevalence of non-cardiovascular findings on CT angiography in children with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Radiol 47:267–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bilotta F, Evered LA, Gruenbaum SE (2017) Neurotoxicity of anesthetic drugs: an update. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 30:452–457

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Houck CS, Vinson AE (2017) Anaesthetic considerations for surgery in newborns. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 102:F359–f363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Olchowy C, Cebulski K, Lasecki M et al (2017) The presence of the gadolinium-based contrast agent depositions in the brain and symptoms of gadolinium neurotoxicity — a systematic review. PLoS One 12:e0171704

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Rossi Espagnet MC, Bernardi B, Pasquini L et al (2017) Signal intensity at unenhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance in the globus pallidus and dentate nucleus after serial administrations of a macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent in children. Pediatr Radiol 47:1345–1352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Flood TF, Stence NV, Maloney JA, Mirsky DM (2017) Pediatric brain: repeated exposure to linear gadolinium-based contrast material is associated with increased signal intensity at unenhanced T1-weighted MR imaging. Radiology 282:222–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rose-Felker K, Robinson JD, Backer CL et al (2017) Preoperative use of CT angiography in infants with coarctation of the aorta. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg 8:196–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dyer KT, Hlavacek AM, Meinel FG et al (2014) Imaging in congenital pulmonary vein anomalies: the role of computed tomography. Pediatr Radiol 44:1158–1168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee EY, Jenkins KJ, Muneeb M et al (2013) Proximal pulmonary vein stenosis detection in pediatric patients: value of multiplanar and 3-D VR imaging evaluation. Pediatr Radiol 43:929–936

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cohen MS, Anderson RH, Cohen MI et al (2007) Controversies, genetics, diagnostic assessment, and outcomes relating to the heterotaxy syndrome. Cardiol Young 17:29–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Uemura H, Ho SY, Devine WA et al (1995) Atrial appendages and venoatrial connections in hearts from patients with visceral heterotaxy. Ann Thorac Surg 60:561–569

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Anderson RH (2000) Atrial structure in the presence of visceral heterotaxy. Cardiol Young 10:299–302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wolla CD, Hlavacek AM, Schoepf UJ et al (2013) Cardiovascular manifestations of heterotaxy and related situs abnormalities assessed with CT angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 7:408–416

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Taylor GA (2011) CT appearance of the duodenum and mesenteric vessels in children with normal and abnormal bowel rotation. Pediatr Radiol 41:1378–1383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Orzech N, Navarro OM, Langer JC (2006) Is ultrasonography a good screening test for intestinal malrotation? J Pediatr Surg 41:1005–1009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Boone JM, Strauss KJ, Cody DD et al (2011) AAPM report 204: size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations. American Association of Physicists in Medicine, College Park

    Google Scholar 

  26. Loomba RS, Hlavacek AM, Spicer DE, Anderson RH (2015) Isomerism or heterotaxy: which term leads to better understanding? Cardiol Young 25:1037–1043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Strouse PJ (2004) Disorders of intestinal rotation and fixation ("malrotation"). Pediatr Radiol 34:837–851

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yim D, Nagata H, Lam CZ et al (2018) Disharmonious patterns of heterotaxy and isomerism: how often are the classic patterns breached? Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 11:e006917

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tremblay C, Loomba RS, Frommelt PC et al (2017) Segregating bodily isomerism or heterotaxy: potential echocardiographic correlations of morphological findings. Cardiol Young 27:1470–1480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Uemura H, Ho SY, Devine WA, Anderson RH (1995) Analysis of visceral heterotaxy according to splenic status, appendage morphology, or both. Am J Cardiol 76:846–849

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Loomba RS, Anderson RH (2016) Polysplenia or left isomerism? Intern Med 55:555

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yildirim SV, Tokel K, Varan B et al (2007) Clinical investigations over 13 years to establish the nature of the cardiac defects in patients having abnormalities of lateralization. Cardiol Young 17:275–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Srivastava D, Preminger T, Lock JE et al (1995) Hepatic venous blood and the development of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations in congenital heart disease. Circulation 92:1217–1222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Burstein DS, Mavroudis C, Puchalski MD et al (2011) Pulmonary arteriovenous malformations in heterotaxy syndrome: the case for early, direct hepatic vein-to-azygos vein connection. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg 2:119–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. McElhinney DB, Marx GR, Newburger JW (2011) Congenital portosystemic venous connections and other abdominal venous abnormalities in patients with polysplenia and functionally univentricular heart disease: a case series and literature review. Congenit Heart Dis 6:28–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. McElhinney DB, Marx GR, Marshall AC et al (2011) Cavopulmonary pathway modification in patients with heterotaxy and newly diagnosed or persistent pulmonary arteriovenous malformations after a modified Fontan operation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 141:1362–1370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Baban A, Cantarutti N, Adorisio R et al (2018) Long-term survival and phenotypic spectrum in heterotaxy syndrome: a 25-year follow-up experience. Int J Cardiol 268:100–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Rameshbabu CS, Gupta KK, Qasim M, Gupta OP (2015) Heterotaxy polysplenia syndrome in an adult with unique vascular anomalies: case report with review of literature. J Radiol Case Rep 9:22–37

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Bartram U, Wirbelauer J, Speer CP (2005) Heterotaxy syndrome — asplenia and polysplenia as indicators of visceral malposition and complex congenital heart disease. Biol Neonate 88:278–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Van Praagh S (1992) Cardiac malpositions and the heterotaxy syndromes. In: Keane J, Fyler D, Lock J (eds) Nadas’ pediatric cardiology, 2nd edn. Hanley & Belfus Inc. Mosby, Philadelphia, pp 589–608

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thank you to the team of the Department of Diagnostic Imaging at the Instituto Nacional de Salud del Niño San Borja, especially to technologists Victor Guerra, Veronica Megue and Eddin Saavedra, who generated the 3-D reconstructions used in this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos F. Ugas Charcape.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ugas Charcape, C.F., Alpaca Rodriguez, L.R., Matos Rojas, I.A. et al. Characterisation of computed tomography angiography findings in paediatric patients with heterotaxy. Pediatr Radiol 49, 1142–1151 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04434-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04434-0

Keywords

Navigation