Skip to main content
Log in

Pediatric ileocolic intussusception: new observations and unexpected implications

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 25 January 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

Ileocolic intussusception occurs when the terminal ileum “telescopes” into the colon. We observed that ileocolic intussusception lengths are similar regardless of location in the colon.

Objective

To examine the uniformity of ileocolic intussusception length and its relationship to colon location, symptom duration and reducibility.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed ultrasound-diagnosed pediatric ileocolic intussusceptions initially treated with pneumatic reduction at the Mayo Clinic or Texas Children’s Hospital. We recorded demographic, imaging and surgical findings including age, gender, symptom duration, location of the ileocolic intussusception, reducibility with air enema and, if fluoroscopically irreducible, surgical findings.

Results

We identified 119 ileocolic intussusceptions (64% boys), with 81% in the right colon. There was no significant relationship between ileocolic intussusception length and colon location (P=0.15), nor ileocolic intussusception length and symptom duration (P=0.36). Ileocolic intussusceptions were more distal with increasing symptom duration (P=0.016). Successful reductions were unrelated to symptom duration (P=0.84) but were more likely with proximal versus distal locations (P=0.02).

Conclusion

Ileocolic intussusception lengths are relatively uniform regardless of location along the course of the colon where they present. Our findings suggest that most of the apparent distal propagation of ileocolic intussusceptions is not caused by increasing telescoping of small bowel across the ileocecal valve but rather by foreshortening of the right colon. This implies poor cecal fixation and confirms fluoroscopic and surgical observations of cecal displacement from the right lower quadrant with ileocolic intussusceptions. The movement of the leading edge of the ileocolic intussusception during reduction is first due to “relocating” the cecum into the right lower quadrant after which the reduction of small bowel back across the ileocecal valve then occurs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 25 January 2019

    In this article, the fourth author’s name is misspelled. The correct spelling, as shown above, should be “Nadia F. Mahmood.”

References

  1. Katz ME, Kolm P (1992) Intussusception reduction 1991: an international survey of pediatric radiologists. Pediatr Radiol 22:318–322

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hannon E, Williams R, Allan R, Okoye B (2014) UK intussusception audit: a national survey of practice and audit of reduction rates. Clin Radiol 69:344–349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Edwards EA, Pigg N, Courtier J et al (2017) Intussusception: past, present and future. Pediatr Radiol 47:1101–1108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gilsanz V (1984) Displacement of the appendix in intussusception. AJR Am J Roentgenol 142:407–408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Berdon WE (1995) The diagnosis of malrotation and volvulus in the older child and adult: a trap for radiologists. Pediatr Radiol 25:101–103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. O’Neil J (2003) Chapter 54: intussusception. In: O’Neil J, Grosfeld J, Fonkalsrud E (eds) Principles of pediatric surgery. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 527–528

    Google Scholar 

  7. Waugh GE (1911) Referred penile pain in intussusception, with notes of three cases. Lancet 177:1492–1494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brereton RJ, Taylor B, Hall CM (1986) Intussusception and intestinal malrotation in infants: Waugh's syndrome. Br J Surg 73:55–57

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cera SM (2008) Intestinal intussusception. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 21:106–113

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Columbini PM, Scholz S (2012) Chapter 85: intussusception in pediatric surgery. In: Coran AG, Adzick NS, Krummel TM et al (eds) Pediatric surgery e-book. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 1093–1110

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Lampl BS, Glaab J, Ayyala RS et al (2017) Is intussusception a middle-of-the-night emergency? Pediatr Emerg Care. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000001246

  12. Tareen F, Ryan S, Avanzini S et al (2011) Does the length of the history influence the outcome of pneumatic reduction of intussusception in children? Pediatr Surg Int 27:587–589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Flaum V, Schneider A, Gomes Ferreira C et al (2016) Twenty years' experience for reduction of ileocolic intussusceptions by saline enema under sonography control. J Pediatr Surg 51:179–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Saxton V, Katz M, Phelan E, Beasley SW (1994) Intussusception: a repeat delayed gas enema increases the nonoperative reduction rate. J Pediatr Surg 29:588–589

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sandler A, Ein S, Connolly B et al (1999) Unsuccessful air-enema reduction of intussusception: is a second attempt worthwhile? Pediatr Surg Int 15:214–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the manuscript preparation assistance of Sonia Watson, PhD.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Larry A. Binkovitz.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Binkovitz, L.A., Kolbe, A.B., Orth, R.C. et al. Pediatric ileocolic intussusception: new observations and unexpected implications. Pediatr Radiol 49, 76–81 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-018-4259-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-018-4259-9

Keywords

Navigation