Advertisement

Pediatric Radiology

, Volume 48, Issue 7, pp 923–931 | Cite as

Combined prospectively electrocardiography- and respiratory-triggered sequential cardiac computed tomography in free-breathing children: success rate and image quality

  • Hyun Woo Goo
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Combined prospectively electrocardiography (ECG)- and respiratory-triggered sequential cardiac computed tomography (CT) has not been evaluated in free-breathing children.

Objective

To evaluate the success rate and image quality of combined prospectively ECG- and respiratory-triggered sequential cardiac CT in free-breathing children.

Materials and methods

Image quality of combined prospectively ECG- and respiratory-triggered sequential cardiac CT in 870 children (≤5 years of age) was evaluated in terms of severe motion (maximal distance ≥2 mm) and band artifacts (maximal attenuation difference ≥100 Hounsfield units). The success rate of the scan mode was calculated. The causes of failed cases were assessed. Patient-related, radiation and image quality parameters were compared between success and failure groups.

Results

Severe motion artifacts were observed in 10.6% (92/870) of patients due to cardiac phase error in 17 (18.5%), patient motion in 12 (13.0%), and unknown causes in 63 (68.5%). Severe band artifacts were seen in 13.2% (115/870) of patients. Combined prospectively ECG- and respiratory-triggered sequential cardiac CT was successfully performed in 78.5% (683/870) of patients, while it failed in 21.5% (187/870). All the evaluated patient-related, radiation and image quality parameters were significantly different (P≤0.001) between success and failure groups except effective dose (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Additional prospective respiratory triggering can reduce motion artifacts in prospectively ECG-triggered sequential cardiac CT in free-breathing children.

Keywords

Cardiac computed tomography Children Electrocardiography triggering Image quality Respiratory triggering 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

None

References

  1. 1.
    Goo HW (2010) State-of-the-art CT imaging techniques for congenital heart disease. Korean J Radiol 11:4–18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Flohr TG, Leng S, Yu L et al (2009) Dual-source spiral CT with pitch up to 3.2 and 75 ms temporal resolution: image reconstruction and assessment of image quality. Med Phys 36:5641–5653CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nie P, Wang X, Cheng Z et al (2012) Accuracy, image quality and radiation dose comparison of high-pitch spiral and sequential acquisition on 128-slice dual-source CT angiography in children with congenital heart disease. Eur Radiol 22:2057–2066CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sriharan M, Lazoura O, Pavitt CW et al (2016) Evaluation of high-pitch ungated pediatric cardiovascular computed tomography for the assessment of cardiac structures in neonates. J Thorac Imaging 31:177–182CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goo HW, Allmendinger T (2017) Combined electrocardiography- and respiratory-triggered CT of the lung to reduce respiratory misregistration artifacts between imaging slabs in free-breathing children: initial experience. Korean J Radiol 18:860–866CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lu JG, Lv B, Chen XB et al (2010) What is the best contrast injection protocol for 64-row multi-detector cardiac computed tomography? Eur J Radiol 75:159–165CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goo HW, Yang DH (2010) Coronary artery visibility in free-breathing young children with congenital heart disease on cardiac 64-slice CT: dual-source ECG-triggered sequential scan vs. single-source non-ECG-synchronized spiral scan. Pediatr Radiol 40:1670–1680CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pache G, Grohmann J, Bulla S et al (2011) Prospective electrocardiography-triggered CT angiography of the great thoracic vessels in infants and toddlers with congenital heart disease: feasibility and image quality. Eur J Radiol 80:e440–e445CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Blanke P, Bulla S, Baumann T et al (2010) Thoracic aorta: prospective electrocardiographically triggered CT angiography with dual-source CT--feasibility, image quality, and dose reduction. Radiology 255:207–217CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wu W, Budovec J, Foley WD (2009) Prospective and retrospective ECG gating for thoracic CT angiography: a comparative study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:955–963CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jin KN, Park EA, Shin CI et al (2010) Retrospective versus prospective ECG-gated dual-source CT in pediatric patients with congenital heart diseases: comparison of image quality and radiation dose. Int J Card Imaging 26:63–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goo HW (2011) Individualized volume CT dose index determined by cross-sectional area and mean density of the body to achieve uniform image noise of contrast-enhanced pediatric chest CT obtained at variable kV levels and with combined tube current modulation. Pediatr Radiol 41:839–847CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goo HW, Suh DS (2006) Tube current reduction in non-electrocardiography-gated heart CT by combined tube current modulation in children. Pediatr Radiol 36:344–351CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kaasalainen T, Palmu K, Reijonen V, Kortesniemi M (2014) Effect of patient centering on patient dose and image noise in chest CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:123–130CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee KB, Goo HW (2018) Quantitative image quality and histogram-based evaluations of an iterative reconstruction algorithm at low-to-ultralow radiation dose levels: a phantom study in chest CT. Korean J Radiol 19:119–129CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Goo HW (2012) CT radiation dose optimization and estimation: an update for radiologists. Korean J Radiol 13:1–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hui P, Goo HW, Du J et al (2017) Asian consortium on radiation dose of pediatric cardiac CT (ASCI-REDCARD). Pediatr Radiol 47:899–910CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bae KT (2003) Peak contrast enhancement in CT and MR angiography: when dose it occur and why? Pharmacokinetic study in a porcine model. Radiology 227:809–816CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Goo HW, Park S (2015) Semiautomatic three-dimensional CT ventricular volumetry in patients with congenital heart disease: agreement between two methods with different user interaction. Int J Card Imaging 31:223–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Goo HW (2017) Serial changes in anatomy and ventricular function on dual-source cardiac computed tomography after the Norwood procedure for hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Pediatr Radiol 47:1776–1786CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Goo HW, Seo DM, Yun TJ et al (2009) Coronary artery anomalies and clinically important anatomy in patients with congenital heart disease: multislice CT findings. Pediatr Radiol 39:265–273CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Goo HW (2018) Identification of coronary artery anatomy on dual-source cardiac computed tomography before arterial switch operation in newborns and young infants: comparison with transthoracic echocardiography. Pediatr Radiol 48:176–185CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang Q, Qin J, He B et al (2013) Double prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition for CT coronary angiography: initial experience. Clin Radiol 68:792–798CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhang T, Wang W, Luo Z et al (2012) Initial experience on the application of 320-row CT angiography with low-dose prospective ECG-triggered in children with congenital heart disease. Int J Card Imaging 28:1787–1797CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical CenterUniversity of Ulsan College of MedicineSeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations