Skip to main content
Log in

Image-guided placement of percutaneous de novo low-profile gastrojejunostomy tubes in the pediatric population: a study of feasibility and efficacy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

De novo low-profile gastrojejunostomy tubes in pediatric patients offer less external catheter bulk and decreased propensity for dislodgement as children become more mobile. While small cohort studies have evaluated de novo placement of coaxial, adjustable-length, percutaneous gastrojejunostomy (GJ) tubes in children, placement of de novo low-profile GJ tubes in pediatric patients has not been analyzed.

Objective

This study evaluates technical feasibility, safety and clinical efficacy of percutaneous, retrograde placement of de novo low-profile GJ tubes in infants and children.

Materials and methods

Following institutional review board approval, all de novo low-profile GJ tube placements in patients were retrospectively reviewed between May 2014 and May 2017. Technical parameters of fluoroscopy time, tube size, T-fasteners and complications were recorded. Clinical data, including age, indication, weight gain and complications, were analyzed.

Results

Thirty-four de novo low-profile GJ tubes were placed in 34 patients (median age: 9.4 months, range: 2 months-11.8 years; median pre-procedural weight: 7.5 kg, range: 2.9-31.6 kg). Twenty-one 14-Fr and 13 16-Fr GJ tubes were placed with technical success rate of 100%. Average weight gain 3 months’ post procedure was 1.1 kg (range: 0.3-4.8 kg) and average weight percentile for age increase was 9.6% (range: -48.9% to 53.5%). One major complication occurred following balloon inflation within the tract causing pain requiring urgent replacement of the GJ tube. Minor complications occurred in 11 patients (32%): accidental dislodgement (n=9), skin irritation (n=4), tube dysfunction (n=2), leakage (n=2) and tube migration into the esophagus (n=1).

Conclusion

Percutaneous, antegrade, image-guided placement of de novo low-profile GJ tubes is technically feasible, safe and clinically efficacious in appropriately selected pediatric patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aquino VM, Smyrl CB, Hagg R et al (1995) Enteral nutritional support by gastrostomy tube in children with cancer. J Pediatr 127:58–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bowman LC, Williams R, Sanders M et al (1998) Algorithm for nutritional support: experience of the metabolic and infusion support Service of St. Jude Children’s research hospital. Int J Cancer 11:76–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cahill NE, Dhaliwal R, Day AG et al (2010) Nutrition therapy in the critical care setting: what is “best achievable” practice? An international multicenter observational study. Crit Care Med 38:395–401

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Niv E, Fireman Z, Vaisman N (2009) Post-pyloric feeding. World J Gastroenterol 15:1281–1288

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Itkin M, DeLegg MH, Fang JC et al (2011) Multidisciplinary practical guidelines for gastrointestinal access for enteral nutrition and decompression from the Society of Interventional Radiology and American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) institute, with endorsement by Canadian Interventional Radiological Association (CIRA) and Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE). J Vasc Interv Radiol 22:1089–1106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Michaud L, Robert-Dehault A, Coopman S et al (2012) One-step percutaneous gastrojejunostomy in early infancy. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 54:820–821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Given MF, Hanson JJ, Lee MJ (2005) Interventional radiology techniques for provision of enteral feeding. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 28:692–703

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Novotny NM, Vegeler RC, Breckler FD et al (2009) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy buttons in children: superior to tubes. J Pediatr Surg 44:1193–1196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Livingston MH, Shawyer AC, Rosenbaum PL et al (2015) Fundoplication and gastrostomy versus percutaneous gastrojejunostomy for gastroesophageal reflux in children with neurologic impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg 50:707–714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Richioud B, Louazon T, Beji H et al (2015) De novo radiologic placement of button gastrostomy: a feasibility study in children with cancer. Pediatr Radiol 45:1957–1963

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Power S, Kavanagh LN, Shields MC et al (2013) Insertion of balloon retained gastrostomy buttons: a 5-year retrospective review of 260 patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 36:484–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Crowley JJ, Hogan MJ, Towbin RB et al (2014) Quality improvement guidelines for pediatric gastrostomy and gastrojejunostomy tube placement. J Vasc Interv Radiol 25:1983–1991

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Omary RA, Bettmann MA, Cardella JF et al (2003) Quality improvement guidelines for the reporting and archiving of interventional radiology procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:S293–S295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cardella JF, Kundu S, Miller DL et al (2009) Society of Interventional Radiology clinical practice guidelines. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20:S189–S191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Barnhart DC (2016) Gastroesophageal reflux disease in children. Semin Pediatr Surg 25:212–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Campwala I, Perrone E, Yanni G et al (2015) Complications of gastrojejunal feeding tubes in children. J Surg Res 199:67–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Demehri FR, Simha S, Herrman E et al (2016) Analysis of risk factors contributing to morbidity from gastrojejunostomy feeding tubes in children. J Pediatr Surg 51:1005–1009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wales PW, Diamond IR, Dutta S et al (2002) Fundoplication and gastrostomy versus image-guided gastrojejunal tube for enteral feeding in neurologically impaired children with gastroesophageal reflux. J Pediatr Surg 37:407–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Albanese CT, Towbin RB, Ulman I et al (1993) Percutaneous gastrojejunostomy versus Nissen fundoplication for enteral feeding of the neurologically impaired child with gastroesophageal reflux. J Pediatr 123:371–375

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Portions of this data were presented as an oral abstract presentation at the 2017 Society for Pediatric Radiology annual meeting.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne E. Gill.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gill, A.E., Gallagher, N., McElhanon, B.O. et al. Image-guided placement of percutaneous de novo low-profile gastrojejunostomy tubes in the pediatric population: a study of feasibility and efficacy. Pediatr Radiol 48, 882–888 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-018-4082-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-018-4082-3

Keywords

Navigation