Skip to main content
Log in

IVC filter placements in children: nationwide comparison of practice patterns at adult and children’s hospitals using the Kids’ Inpatient Database

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement in children has been described in literature, but there is variability with regard to their indications. No nationally representative study has been done to compare practice patterns of filter placements at adult and children’s hospitals.

Objective

To perform a nationally representative comparison of IVC filter placement practices in children at adult and children’s hospitals.

Materials and methods

The 2012 Kids’ Inpatient Database was searched for IVC filter placements in children <18 years of age. Using the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9) code for filter insertion (38.7), IVC filter placements were identified. A small number of children with congenital cardiovascular anomalies codes were excluded to improve specificity of the code used to identify filter placement. Filter placements were further classified by patient demographics, hospital type (children’s and adult), United States geographic region, urban/rural location, and teaching status. Statistical significance of differences between children’s or adult hospitals was determined using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.

Results

A total of 618 IVC filter placements were identified in children <18 years (367 males, 251 females, age range: 5–18 years) during 2012. The majority of placements occurred in adult hospitals (573/618, 92.7%). Significantly more filters were placed in the setting of venous thromboembolism in children’s hospitals (40/44, 90%) compared to adult hospitals (246/573, 43%) (P<0.001). Prophylactic filters comprised 327/573 (57%) at adult hospitals, with trauma being the most common indication (301/327, 92%). The mean length of stay for patients receiving filters was 24.5 days in children’s hospitals and 18.4 days in adult hospitals.

Conclusion

The majority of IVC filters in children are placed in adult hospital settings. Children’s hospitals are more likely to place therapeutic filters for venous thromboembolism, compared to adult hospitals where the prophylactic setting of trauma predominates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Spentzouris G, Scriven RJ, Lee TK, Labropoulos N (2012) Pediatric venous thromboembolism in relation to adults. J Vasc Surg 55:1785–1793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Raffini L, Huang YS, Witmer C, Feudtner C (2009) Dramatic increase in venous thromboembolism in children's hospitals in the United States from 2001 to 2007. Pediatrics 124:1001–1008

  3. Blevins EM, Glanz K, Huang YS et al (2015) A multicenter cohort study of inferior vena cava filter use in children. Pediatr Blood Cancer 62:2089–2093

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cook A, Shackford S, Osler T et al (2005) Use of vena cava filters in pediatric trauma patients: data from the National Trauma Data Bank. J Trauma 59:1114–1120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rottenstreich A, Revel-Vilk S, Bloom AI, Kalish Y (2015) Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters in children: A 10-year single center experience. Pediatr Blood Cancer 62:1974–1978

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Overview of the Kids' Inpatient Database (KID). Available from: https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/kidoverview.jsp

  7. Smith SB, Geske JB, Kathuria P et al (2016) Analysis of national trends in admissions for pulmonary embolism. Chest 150:35–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stein PD, Matta F, Hughes MJ (2016) Inferior vena cava filters in elderly patients with stable acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Med 130:356–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Monagle P, Chan AK, Goldenberg NA et al (2012) Antithrombotic therapy in neonates and children: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 141:e737S–e801S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kukreja KU, Gollamudi J, Patel MN et al (2011) Inferior vena cava filters in children: our experience and suggested guidelines. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 33:334–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Leeper CM, Vissa M, Cooper JD et al (2017) Venous thromboembolism in pediatric trauma patients: Ten-year experience and long-term follow-up in a tertiary care center. Pediatr Blood Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.26415

  12. Temple M, Fernandes N, Kukreja K, Amaral J (2016) Multi-institutional review of inferior vena cava filter use in children: preliminary results. J Vasc Interv Radiol 27:S187. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2015.12.483

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was presented as an oral presentation at the Society of Interventional Radiology 2017 annual meeting in Washington, DC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vibhor Wadhwa.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Supplementary Table 1

ESM 1

(DOCX 92.9 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wadhwa, V., Trivedi, P.S., Ali, S. et al. IVC filter placements in children: nationwide comparison of practice patterns at adult and children’s hospitals using the Kids’ Inpatient Database. Pediatr Radiol 48, 253–257 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-4001-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-4001-z

Keywords

Navigation