Infant bone age estimation based on fibular shaft length: model development and clinical validation
- 354 Downloads
Bone age in infants (<1 year old) is generally estimated using hand/wrist or knee radiographs, or by counting ossification centers. The accuracy and reproducibility of these techniques are largely unknown.
To develop and validate an infant bone age estimation technique using fibular shaft length and compare it to conventional methods.
Materials and methods
We retrospectively reviewed negative skeletal surveys of 247 term-born low-risk-of-abuse infants (no persistent child protection team concerns) from July 2005 to February 2013, and randomized them into two datasets: (1) model development (n = 123) and (2) model testing (n = 124). Three pediatric radiologists measured all fibular shaft lengths. An ordinary linear regression model was fitted to dataset 1, and the model was evaluated using dataset 2. Readers also estimated infant bone ages in dataset 2 using (1) the hemiskeleton method of Sontag, (2) the hemiskeleton method of Elgenmark, (3) the hand/wrist atlas of Greulich and Pyle, and (4) the knee atlas of Pyle and Hoerr. For validation, we selected lower-extremity radiographs of 114 normal infants with no suspicion of abuse. Readers measured the fibulas and also estimated bone ages using the knee atlas. Bone age estimates from the proposed method were compared to the other methods.
The proposed method outperformed all other methods in accuracy and reproducibility. Its accuracy was similar for the testing and validating datasets, with root-mean-square error of 36 days and 37 days; mean absolute error of 28 days and 31 days; and error variability of 22 days and 20 days, respectively.
This study provides strong support for an infant bone age estimation technique based on fibular shaft length as a more accurate alternative to conventional methods.
KeywordsBone age Children Elgenmark Fibula Greulich and Pyle atlas Pyle and Hoerr Radiography Sontag
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflicts of interest
- 1.Black S, Aggrawal A, Payne-James J (2011) Age estimation in the living: the practitioner’s guide. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 3.Greulich WW, Pyle SI (1959) Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist, 2nd edn. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
- 4.Tanner J, Whitehouse R, Cameron N et al (1975) Assessment of skeletal maturity and prediction of adult height (TW2 method), 2nd edn. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 6.Gilsanz V, Ratib O (2005) Hand bone age: a digital atlas of skeletal maturity. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- 13.Michelson N (1934) The calcification of the first costal cartilage among whites and negroes. Hum Biol 6:543–557Google Scholar
- 16.Thevissen PW, Kaur J, Willems G (2012) Human age estimation combining third molar and skeletal development. Int J Legal Med 126:282–292Google Scholar
- 17.Pyle SI, Hoerr NL (1969) A radiographic standard of reference for the growing knee. Charles C. Thomas, SpringfieldGoogle Scholar
- 18.Dedouit F, Auriol J, Rousseau H et al (2012) Age assessment by magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: a preliminary study. Forensic Sci Int 217:232.e1–7Google Scholar
- 19.Hoerr NL, Pyle SI, Francis CC (1962) Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the foot and ankle: a standard of reference. Charles C. Thomas, SpringfieldGoogle Scholar
- 21.Sontag LW, Snell D, Anderson M (1939) Rate of appearance of ossification centers from birth to the age of five years. Am J Dis Child 58:949–956Google Scholar
- 24.Laor T, Jaramillo D, Oestreich AE (1998) Musculoskeletal system. In: Kirks DR (ed) Practical pediatric imaging. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 327–510Google Scholar
- 25.Sundick RI (1978) Human skeletal growth and age determination. Homo 29:228–249Google Scholar
- 26.Ubelaker DH (1978) Human skeletal remains: excavation, analysis, interpretation. Taraxacum, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
- 27.Maresh MM, Deming J (1939) The growth of the long bones in 80 infants. Roentgenograms versus anthropometry. Child Dev 10:91–106Google Scholar
- 31.Lopez-Costas O, Rissech C, Trancho G, Turbon D (2012) Postnatal ontogenesis of the tibia. Implications for age and sex estimation. Forensic Sci Int 214:207.e1–e11Google Scholar
- 32.Breen MA, Tsai A, Kleinman PK (2015) Bone age assessment practices among SPR members: infants are not just little children. Pediatr Radiol 45:S110–S111Google Scholar
- 33.WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group (2009) WHO child growth standards: growth velocity based on weight, length and head circumference: methods and development. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 35.American College of Radiology (2006) ACR practice guideline for skeletal surveys in children (Res. 47, 17, 35). In: American College of Radiology. ACR Standards. American College of Radiology, Reston, pp 203–207Google Scholar
- 40.Ghantus MK (1951) Growth of the shaft of the human radius and ulna during the first two years of life. AJR Am J Roentgenol 65:784–786Google Scholar
- 41.Anderson M, Green WT, Messer MB (1963) Growth and predictions of growth in lower extremities. J Bone Joint Surg 45A:1–14Google Scholar
- 43.Goldman J, Salus MK, Wolcott D, Kennedy KY (2003) A coordinated response to child abuse and neglect: the foundation for practice. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau, Office on Child Abuse and Neglect, Washington DCGoogle Scholar