Local diagnostic reference level based on size-specific dose estimates: Assessment of pediatric abdominal/pelvic computed tomography at a Japanese national children’s hospital
- 515 Downloads
A child’s body size is not accurately reflected by volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose–length product (DLP). Size-specific dose estimation (SSDE) was introduced recently as a new index of radiation dose. However, it has not yet been established as a diagnostic reference level (DRL).
To calculate the SSDE of abdominal/pelvic CT and compare the SSDE with CTDIvol. To calculate the DRLs of CTDIvol and SSDE. Our hypotheses are: SSDE values will be greater than CTDIvol, and our DRL will be smaller than the known DRLs of other countries.
Materials and methods
The CTDIvol and DLP of 117 children who underwent abdominal/pelvic CT were collected retrospectively. The SSDE was calculated from the sum of the lateral and anteroposterior diameters. The relationships between body weight and effective diameter and between effective diameter and CTDIvol/SSDE were compared. Further, the local DRL was compared with the DRLs of other countries.
Body weight and effective diameter and effective diameter and SSDE were positively correlated. In children ages 1, 5 and 10 years, the SSDE is closer to the exposure dose of CTDIvol for the 16-cm phantom, while in children ages 15 years, the SSDE falls between CTDIvol for the 16-cm phantom and that for the 32-cm phantom. The local DRL was lower than those of other countries.
With SSDE, the radiation dose increased with increasing body weight. Since SSDE takes body size into account, it proved to be a useful indicator for estimating the exposure dose.
KeywordsSize-specific dose estimates Diagnostic reference level CT Child Radiation dose
This article was supported by the Grant of National Center for Child Health and Development, Japan, 23 A – 4, 26–20
Conflicts of interest
- 4.International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) (2007) Managing patient dose in multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). ICRP Publication 102. Ann. ICRP 37. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- 5.Galanski M. Nagal HD. Stamm G (2007) Paediatric CT exposure practice in the federal republic of Germany. Results of a nationwide survey in 2005/6. Medizinishe Hochschule Hannover. Available via www.mh-hannover.de/fileadmin/kliniken/diagnostische_radiologie/download/Report_German_Paed-CT-Survey_2005_06.pdf. Accessed 29 Nov 2013
- 8.Buls N. Bosmans H. Mommaert C et al (2010) CT paediatric doses in Belgium: a multi-center study: results of a dosimetry audit 2007–2009. Available via http://www.fanc.fgov.be/GED/00000000/2400/2449.pdf, Accessed 29 Nov 2013
- 10.McNitt-Gray M (2011) Assessing radiation dose: how to do it right. AAPM 2011 Summit on CT dose available via http://www.aapm.org/meetings/2011CTS/documents/McNitt-GrayAssessingRadiationdoseFINAL.pdf#search= ’McNittGray + M.Assessing + radiation + dose%3A + how + to + do + it + right’. Accessed 29 Nov 2013
- 12.Boone JM. Strauss KJ. Code DD et al (2011) Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations. AAPM Report No. 204. Available via http://www.aapm.org. Accessed 14 June 2011
- 14.International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) (1991) Recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. ICRP Publication 60. Ann. ICRP 21 (1–3)Google Scholar
- 15.International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) (1996) Radiological protection and safety in medicine. ICRP Publication 73. Ann. ICRP 26 (2)Google Scholar
- 18.International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) (2013) Radiological protection in paediatric diagnostic and interventional radiology. ICRP Publication 121. Ann. ICRP 42 (2)Google Scholar
- 20.Lindskoug BA (1992) Exposure parameters in X ray diagnostics of children infants and the newborn. Radiat Prot Dosim 43:S289–292Google Scholar
- 23.International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) (2002) Medical electrical equipment. Part 2–44: particular requirements for the safety of x-ray equipment for computed tomography. IEC publication No. 60601–2–44, edn 2.1. IEC Central Office, GenevaGoogle Scholar