Pediatric Radiology

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 398–402 | Cite as

Normal patterns of 18F-FDG appendiceal uptake in children

  • Hamilton E. ReaveyEmail author
  • Adina L. Alazraki
  • Stephen F. Simoneaux
Original Article



Prior to interpreting PET/CT, it is crucial to understand the normal biodistribution of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). It is also important to realize that the normal biodistribution can vary between adults and children. Although many studies have defined normal patterns of pediatric FDG uptake in structures like the thymus, brown fat and bone marrow, patterns of normal pediatric bowel activity, specifically uptake within the appendix, have not been well described. Active lymphoid tissue has increased FDG uptake when compared with inactive tissue. Since children have more active lymphoid tissue than adults, and because the appendix contains aggregated lymphoid tissue, we postulated that appendiceal uptake may be increased in pediatric patients.


To define the normal level of appendiceal FDG activity in children by evaluating a series of consecutive FDG PET/CT scans performed for other indications.

Materials and methods

After obtaining IRB approval, we retrospectively reviewed 128 consecutive whole-body pediatric FDG PET/CT examinations obtained for a variety of clinical indications. CT scans on which the appendix could not be visualized were excluded from analysis. CT scans on which the appendix could be visualized were evaluated for underlying appendiceal pathology. Studies with appendiceal or periappendiceal pathology by CT criteria were excluded. A region of interest (ROI) was placed over a portion of each appendix and appendiceal maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was calculated. If an adjacent loop of bowel activity interfered with accurate measurements of the appendix SUVmax, the scan was excluded from the analysis. A chart review was performed on patients with elevated appendiceal SUVmax values to ensure that the patients did not have clinical symptomatology suggestive of acute appendicitis. When the appendix or a portion of the appendix could be visualized and accurately measured, the SUVmax was determined. SUVmax of the appendix was compared to the SUVmax of normal liver and ratios were recorded.


A total of 128 scans were reviewed, patient ages 1 month to 21 years (mean age: 11.6 years). Thirty-one scans were excluded because of inability to visualize the appendix on CT. No scans were excluded for appendiceal/periappendiceal pathology on CT or chart review. No scans had to be excluded for inability to obtain an accurate SUVmax measurement because measurements were calculated on portions of the appendix separate from adjacent bowel using small ROIs. Maximum appendiceal SUVs ranged from 0.5 to 9.4 (mean: 2.2) with an appendix-to-liver background ratio ranging from 0.3 to 3.1 (mean: 1.1).


FDG uptake in the appendix is typically similar to that of background activity. However, slight variations in appendiceal FDG uptake do occur, which should not be misinterpreted as pathological.


Fluorodeoxyglucose PET PET/CT Appendix Children Standardized uptake value Normal variants 


Conflict of interest



  1. 1.
    Shammas A, Lim R, Charron M (2009) Pediatric FDG PET/CT: physiologic uptake, normal variants, and benign conditions. Radiographics 29:1467–1486Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alazraki A, Simoneaux S, Wyly B (2011) Normal conus medullaris FDG uptake in children. Pediatr Radiol 41:1374–1377PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Prabhakar H, Sahani D, Fischman A et al (2007) Bowel hot spots at PET-CT. Radiographics 27:145–159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jadvar H (2011) Colonic FDG uptake pattern in subjects receiving oral contrast with no known or suspected colonic disease. Clin Nucl Med 36:754–756PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Toriihara A, Yoshida K, Umehara I et al (2011) Normal variants of bowel FDG uptake in dual-time-point PET/CT imaging. Ann Nucl Med 25:173–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Israel O, Yefremov N, Bar-Shalom R et al (2005) PET/CT detection of unexpected gastrointestinal foci of 18F-FDG uptake: incidence, localization patterns, and clinical significance. J Nucl Med 46:758–762PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ogawa S, Itabashi M, Kameoka S (2009) Significance of FDG-PET in identification of diseases of the appendix – based on experience of two cases falsely positive for FDG accumulation. Case Rep Gastroenterol 3:125–130PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lu SJ, Osmany S, Khoo J et al (2010) Synchronous adenocarcinoma of the appendix demonstrated on F-18 FDG PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med 35:256–257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Koff S, Sterbis J, Davidson J et al (2006) A unique presentation of appendicitis: F-18 FDG PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med 31:704–706PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hamilton E. Reavey
    • 1
    Email author
  • Adina L. Alazraki
    • 2
  • Stephen F. Simoneaux
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Division of Nuclear Medicine Molecular ImagingEmory UniversityAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Division of Pediatric Imaging, Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta at EglestonEmory UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations