Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Relative distribution of pertinent findings on portable neonatal abdominal radiographs: can we shield the gonads?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Shielding of the gonads is a dose-saving strategy in pediatric radiography and its use is the law in New York and the majority of other states. However, routine use of gonadal shields is controversial because of concerns that important diagnostic information can be obscured.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to assess the frequency and spatial distribution of key findings on portable neonatal abdominal radiographs.

Materials and methods

We reviewed the 2,544 portable neonatal intensive care unit anteroposterior abdominal radiographs performed in 2010 at a university medical center, of which 962 were inadequately shielded. These 962 radiographs were reviewed by pairs of pediatric radiologists for the presence of findings in different regions, including bowel abnormalities, pneumatosis, free air, inguinal hernias, osseous abnormalities, and catheter/tube tips.

Results

The fewest pertinent findings were present below the level of the sacrosciatic notches (n = 181, 18.8%). Of the 853 abnormalities below the level of the iliac crests in our cohort, six were isolated to these regions, whereas others had concomitant abnormalities more superiorly. Of 35 radiographs with pneumatosis or suspected pneumatosis in the pelvis, 33 had pneumatosis in more superior regions. Suspected free air was never isolated to the pelvis. Osseous abnormalities were only present in the pelvis below the sacrosciatic notch, and 37.5% of lower extremity catheters terminated below the level of the sacrosciatic notches.

Conclusion

Pertinent findings on neonatal intensive care unit abdominal radiographs are rarely isolated to the pelvic regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bogdanich J, Rebelo K (2011) X-rays and unshielded infants. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/28/health/28radiation.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all. Accessed 10 Oct 2012

  2. New York State Department of Health, New York State Public Health Law, section 225, part 16. http://www.health.ny.gov/environmental/radiological/radon/radioactive_material_licensing/docs/part16.pdf. Accessed 06 March 2012

  3. Alaska Department of Health and Social Services (2009) 7 AAC 18. Radiation sources and radiation protection. http://hss.state.ak.us/apps/publicnotice/RegulationDetails.aspx?Regulation=294e103b-3d55-48c0-8ae3-3c91f639e372. Accessed 09 February 2013

  4. Arizona Radiation Regulatory Agency (2010) Arizona administrative code, Title XII natural resources, chapter 1: radiation regulation agency. http://www.azsos.gov/public_services/Title_12/12-01.pdf. Accessed 10 February 2013

  5. Arkansas State Board of Health (2012) Rules and regulations for control of ionizing radiation. http://www.healthy.arkansas.gov/aboutadh/rulesregs/ionizingradiation.pdf. Accessed 10 February 2013

  6. California Code of Regulations (1988) Title 26: toxics. https://law.resource.org/pub/us/ccr/gov.ca.oal.title26.html. Accessed 09 February 2013

  7. Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division (2009) 6 CCR 1007–1, State Board of Health, Rules and regulations pertaining to radiation control, part 6. http://www.sos.state.co.us/CCR/Upload/NoticeOfRulemaking/ProposedRuleAttach2009-00806.DOC. Accessed 09 February 2013

  8. Delaware Department of Health and Human Services, Authority on Radiation Protection (2002) Radiation machine registration permit manual. http://dhss.delaware.gov/dph/hsp/files/orcradmacman.pdf. Accessed 10 February 2013

  9. Florida Department of Health (2007) Florida administrative code, part V, X-rays in the healing arts. http://www.floridashealth.com/Environment/radiation/regs/64PART5-08-16-2007.doc. Accessed 09 February 2013

  10. Georgia Secretary of State (1989) Rules and regulations of the State of Georgia, section 290-5-22-.04. X-rays in the healing arts. http://rules.sos.state.ga.us/docs/290/5/22/04.pdf. Accessed 10 February 2013

  11. Hawaii Department of Health (1999) Hawaii administrative rules, chapter 45 of title 11, radiation control. http://gen.doh.hawaii.gov/sites/har/AdmRules1/11-45.pdf. Accessed 10 February 2013

  12. Idaho Department of Health and Welfare (1998) Idaho radiation control rules, 16.02.27. http://adminrules.idaho.gov/rules/current/16/0227.pdf. Accessed 10 February 2013

  13. Illinois Emergency Management Agency (2008) Illinois administrative code, title 32: energy chapter II: Illinois emergency management agency subchapter B: radiation protection part 360: use of X-rays in the healing arts including medical, dental, podiatry, and veterinary medicine. http://www.state.il.us/iema/legal/pdf/32_360.pdf. Accessed 10 February 2013

  14. Indiana State Department of Health (1988) Indoor and radiologic health, radiation machine compliance, rule 6.1. X-rays in the healing arts. http://www.in.gov/isdh/24369.htm. Accessed 09 February 2013

  15. Iowa Department of Public Health. (2013) Chapter 41: Safety requirements for the use of radiation machines and certain uses of radioactive materials. https://www.legis.iowa.gov/DOCS/ACO/IAC/LINC/Chapter.641.41.pdf. Accessed 31 March 2013

  16. Kansas Department of Health and Environment (2005) Radiation control program regulations, part 5. Use of X-rays in the healing arts. http://www.kdheks.gov/radiation/download/2A003_28KDHE_Article_35_2009_KAR_Vol_2A.pdf. Accessed 10 February 2013

  17. Kentucky Legislature (1992) Kentucky administrative regulations, diagnostic X-ray. http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/kar/902/100/115.htm. Accessed 10 February 2013

  18. Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (2012) Louisiana administrative code, title 33 environmental regulatory code, part XV, radiation protection. http://www.deq.louisiana.gov/portal/Portals/0/planning/regs/title33/33v15-201211.pdf. Accessed 10 February 2013

  19. Maine Department of the Secretary of State, Bureau or Corporations, Elections, and Commissions (2010) State agency rules part F, X-rays in the healing arts. http://www.maine.gov/sos/cec/rules/10/144/ch220/144c220f.doc. Accessed 09 February 2013

  20. Maryland Department of the Environment (1994) Code of Maryland regulations 26.12.01.01. http://www.mde.state.md.us/programs/Air/RadiologicalHealth/RegulationsforControlofIonizingRadiation/Documents/www.mde.state.md.us/assets/document/air/RH_comar/regs_final_new.pdf. Accessed 11 February 2013

  21. Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services (2012) Regulations 120.400 X-rays in the healing arts. http://www.mass.gov/eohhs/docs/dph/regs/105cmr120-400.rtf. Accessed 09 Feb 2013

  22. Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs, Radiation Safety Section (1975) Ionizing radiation rules, part 8: medical extremity X-ray installations. http://michigan.gov/documents/bhs_irr_part8_141985_7.pdf. Accessed 09 February 2013

  23. Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota (2009) Minnesota administrative rules, chapter 4732, ionizing radiation. https://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/rules/?id=4732.0510&format=pdf. Accessed 10 February 2013

  24. Mississippi State Department of Health, Division of Radiological Health (2012) Part 21 subpart 78: radiological health. http://www.msdh.state.ms.us/msdhsite/_static/resources/4620.pdf. Accessed 11 February 2013

  25. Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services (2000) Radiation control, X-rays in the healing arts, rule 37.14.1006. http://www.mtrules.org/gateway/ruleno.asp?RN=37.14.100. Accessed 10 February 2013

  26. Nebraska Health and Human Services System (2004) Nebraska administrative code title 180, 6 diagnostic X-rays other than dental radiation generating equipment in the healing arts. http://www.sos.state.ne.us/rules-and-regs/regsearch/Rules/Health_and_Human_Services_System/Title-180/Chapter-06.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2013

  27. Nevada Legislature (1980) Nevada administrative code, chapter 459: hazardous materials. http://www.leg.state.nv.us/nac/nac-459.html#NAC459Sec448. Accessed 10 February 2013

  28. The New Hampshire General Court (2011) New Hampshire rules for the control of radiation. He-P 4045–03, administrative controls. http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rules/state_agencies/he-p4040-4047.html. Accessed 13 February 2013

  29. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (2002) Compliance guidance for quality assurance manual, 2nd edition. http://www.state.nj.us/dep/rpp/qa/qa_down/qaman.pdf. Accessed 10 February 2013

  30. New Mexico Secretary of State (2001) New Mexico administrative code, title 20 environmental protection, chapter 3 radiation protection, part 6 X-rays in the healing arts. http://www.nmcpr.state.nm.us/nmac/parts/title20/20.003.0006.htm. Accessed 09 February 2013

  31. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (2002) North Carolina regulations for protection against radiation. http://www.ncradiation.net/regs/15ancac11_1006.pdf. Accessed 10 February 2013

  32. North Dakota Department of Health (2003) Radiation control, regulation chapter 33-10-06: X-rays in the healing arts. http://www.ndhealth.gov/aq/rad/radrules/33-10-06.pdf. Accessed 10 February 2013

  33. Ohio Administrative Code (2005) Chapter 3701:1–66 radiation generating equipment. http://codes.ohio.gov/oac/3701%3A1-66. Accessed 09 February 2013

  34. Oklahoma State Department of Health (2010) Oklahoma administrative code 310, chapter 281, diagnostic X-ray systems. http://www.ok.gov/health2/documents/CPD.Diagnostic%20X-Ray%20Systems%20Title310.Chapter281.pdf. Accessed 11 February 2013

  35. Oregon Health Authority, Public Health Division (1991) Division 106, X-rays in the healing arts. http://arcweb.sos.state.or.us/pages/rules/oars_300/oar_333/333_106.html. Accessed 09 February 2013

  36. The Pennsylvania Code (1987) Chapter 221, X-rays in the healing arts. http://www.pacode.com/secure/data/025/chapter221/chap221toc.html. Accessed 09 February 2013

  37. State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations Department of Health (2007) Rules and regulations for the control of radiation [R23-1.3-Rad]. http://sos.ri.gov/documents/archives/regdocs/released/pdf/DOH/4864.pdf. Accessed 11 February 2013

  38. South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (2009) X-ray regulations No. 61–64 - Title B - Rules and regulations for radiation control, part IV. Use of X-ray in the health professions. http://www.scdhec.gov/health/radhlth/part04.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2013

  39. South Dakota Legislature (2010) Administrative rules, 44:03:01:10.01. Requirements for personal protective devices. http://legis.state.sd.us/rules/DisplayRule.aspx?Rule=44:03:01:10.01. Accessed 11 February 2013

  40. Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation Division of Radiological Health (2012) Rules chapter 0400-20-06. Use of X-ray apparatus. http://www.tn.gov/sos/rules/0400/0400-20/0400-20-06.20120522.pdf. Accessed 11 February 2013

  41. Texas Department of State Health Services (2004) Radiation control program, use of radiation machines in the healing arts (Texas administrative code 289.227). http://www.dshs.state.tx.us/radiation/rules.shtm. Accessed 11 February 2013

  42. Utah Department of Administrative Services (2013) Utah administrative code, rule R313-28, use of X-rays in the healing arts. http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/code/r313/r313-028.htm. Accessed 09 February 2013

  43. Vermont Department of Health (2010) Vermont radiological health statute and regulations, part 5, chapter 3 radiological health, subchapter 1 radiation protection. http://healthvermont.gov/regs/documents/radio_health_amended_rule.pdf. Accessed 11 February 2013

  44. Virginia Department of Health (2008) Commonwealth of Virginia radiation protection regulations. http://www.vdh.state.va.us/epidemiology/radiologicalhealth/index.htm. Accessed 09 February 2013

  45. Washington State Legislature (2008) Washington administrative code, chapter 246–225, radiation protection. X-rays in the healing arts. http://apps.leg.wa.gov/WAC/default.aspx?dispo=true&cite=246-225&full=true. Accessed 09 February 2013

  46. District of Columbia Department of Health (2012) State regulations for the control of radiation, diagnostic X-rays and imaging systems in the healing arts – part F. http://doh.dc.gov/service/suggested-state-regulations-control-radiation. Accessed 11 February 2013

  47. West Virginia Secretary of State (2001) West Virginia radiologic health rule. http://apps.sos.wv.gov/adlaw/csr/readfile.aspx?DocId=8399&Format=PDF. Accessed 11 February 2013

  48. Wisconsin Department of Health Services (2006) X-ray device registration surveys and inspection, subchapter VII. http://www.dhs.wisconsin.gov/radiation/license/Xray/SubChptrs/Subchapter%20VIII.pdf. Accessed 09 February 2013

  49. Code of Federal Regulations (2012) Title 21, volume 8, chapter I, subchapter J, part 1000. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=1000.50. Accessed 09 February 2013

  50. Frayre AS, Torres P, Gaona E et al (2012) Radiation dose reduction in a neonatal intensive care unit in computed radiography. Appl Radiat Isotopes 71:57–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Suleiman OH (2004) Radiation doses in pediatric radiology: influence of regulations and standards. Pediatr Radiol 3:S242–S246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Hall EJ (2002) Lessons we have learned from our children: cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Pediatr Radiol 32:700–706

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Wrixon AD (2008) New ICRP recommendations. J Radiol Prot 28:161–168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Fawcett SL, Barter SJ (2009) The use of gonad shielding in paediatric hip and pelvis radiographs. The Brit J Radiol 82:363–370

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Pierce DA, Shimizu Y, Preston DL et al (1996) Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors. Report 12, Part I. Cancer: 1950–1990. Radiat Res 146:1–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Hodges PC, Strandjord NM, McCrea A (1958) A testicular shield. J Am Med Assoc 167:1239–1240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Brindhaban A, Al-Khalifah K (2004) Radiation dose to premature infants in neonatal intensive care units in Kuwait. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 111:275–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Makri T et al (2006) Radiation risk assessment in neonatal radiographic examinations of the chest and abdomen: a clinical and Monte Carlo dosimetry study. Phys Med Biol 51:5023–5033

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Sikand M, Stinchcombe S, Livesley PJ (2003) Study on the use of gonadal protection shields during paediatric pelvic X-rays. Ann Roy Coll Surg 85:422–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Curtis JR (2010) Computed tomography shielding methods: a literature review. Radiol Technol 81:428–436

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Hohl C, Mahnken AH, Klotz E et al (2005) Radiation dose reduction to the male gonads during MDCT: the effectiveness of a lead shield. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:128–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Price R, Halson P, Sampson M (1999) Dose reduction during CT scanning in an anthropomorphic phantom by the use of a male gonad shield. Brit J Radiol 72:489–494

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Sancaktutar AA, Bozkurt Y, Onder H et al (2012) A new practical model of testes shield: the effectiveness during abdominopelvic computerized tomography. J Androl 33:984–989

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Willis CE, Slovis TL (2004) The ALARA concept in radiographic dose reduction. Radiol Technol 76:150–152

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Willis CE, Slovis TL (2004) The ALARA concept in pediatric CR and DR: dose reduction in pediatric radiographic exams—a white paper conference executive summary. Pediatr Radiol 3:S162–S164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Don S, Goske MJ, John S et al (2011) Image Gently pediatric digital radiography summit: executive summary. Pediatr Radiol 41:562–565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. McCarty M, Waugh R, McCallum H et al (2001) Paediatric pelvic imaging: improvement in gonad shield placement by multidisciplinary audit. Pediatr Radiol 31:646–649

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Kenny N, Hill J (1992) Gonad protection in young orthopaedic patients. BMJ 304:1411–1413

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Graf JL, Caty MG, Martin DJ et al (2002) Pediatric hernias. Semin Ultrasound CT 23:197–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Bardo DM, Black M, Schenk K et al (2009) Location of the ovaries in girls from newborn to 18 years of age: reconsidering ovarian shielding. Pediatr Radiol 39:253–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Fawcett SL, Gomez AC, Barter SJ et al (2012) More harm than good? The anatomy of misguided shielding of the ovaries. Brit J Radiol 85:e442–e447

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Hutson JM, Balic A, Nation T et al (2010) Cryptorchidism. Semin Pediatr Surg 19:215–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nancy Fefferman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winfeld, M., Strubel, N., Pinkney, L. et al. Relative distribution of pertinent findings on portable neonatal abdominal radiographs: can we shield the gonads?. Pediatr Radiol 43, 1295–1302 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-013-2700-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-013-2700-7

Keywords

Navigation