Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnosis of postoperative bile leak and accurate localization of the site of leak by gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR cholangiography in a child

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Postoperative bile leaks are difficult to diagnose because signs and symptoms are nonspecific, and definitive diagnosis requires a drainage catheter to be placed that drains frank bile or fluid that turns out bile on laboratory analysis. Hepatobiliary scintigraphy, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) have been traditionally used to diagnose bile leak. Scintigraphy has poor spatial resolution and cannot localize the site of leak, ERCP may not be possible with altered postoperative anatomy and PTC is invasive and difficult to perform in the absence of dilated ducts. Recently, contrast-enhanced MR cholangiography using hepatobiliary-specific contrast media has been shown to be a noninvasive, safe way to diagnose and localize the site of bile leak in adults. We report a case of postoperative bile leak after choledochal cyst resection in a child in whom diagnosis was confirmed and the site of leak was accurately localized using gadobenate-enhanced MR cholangiography. This case demonstrates the potential of hepatobiliary-specific contrast media to diagnose postoperative bile leak and accurately localize the site of the leak in children noninvasively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vitellas KM, El-Dieb A, Vaswani KK et al (2002) Using contrast-enhanced MR cholangiography with IV mangafodipir trisodium (Teslascan) to evaluate bile duct leaks after cholecystectomy: a prospective study of 11 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:409–416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aduna M, Larena JA, Martin D et al (2005) Bile duct leak after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: value of contrast-enhanced MRCP. Abdom Imaging 30:480–487

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Alegre Castellanos A, Molina Granados JF, Escribano Fernandez J et al (2012) Early phase detection of bile leak after hepatobiliary surgery: value of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR cholangiography. Abdom Imaging 37:795–802

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Thanh LN, Hien PD, Dung LA et al (2010) Laparoscopic repair for choledochal cyst: lessons learned from 190 cases. J Pediatr Surg 45:540–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Congo K, Lopes MF, Oliveira PH et al (2012) Outcomes of choledochal cysts with or without intrahepatic involvement in children after extrahepatic cyst excision and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Ann Hepatol 11:536–543

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Seale MK, Catalano OA, Saini S et al (2009) Hepatobiliary-specific contrast agents: role in imaging the liver and biliary tree. Radiographics 29:1725–1748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dahlstrom N, Persson A, Albiin N et al (2007) Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography with Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-BOPTA in healthy subjects. Acta Radiol 48:362–368

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tamrazi A, Vasanawala SS (2011) Functional hepatobiliary MR imaging in children. Pediatr Radiol 41:1250–1258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Govind B. Chavhan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chavhan, G.B., Babyn, P.S., Temple, M. et al. Diagnosis of postoperative bile leak and accurate localization of the site of leak by gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR cholangiography in a child. Pediatr Radiol 43, 763–766 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-012-2563-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-012-2563-3

Keywords

Navigation