Skip to main content
Log in

Pulmonary vein flow pattern in children with bidirectional cavopulmonary connection or Fontan circuit

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Typical flow velocity profiles in the extraparenchymal pulmonary veins (PVs) demonstrate two major antegrade flow waves: a biphasic systolic wave (S), with S1 and S2 peaks and a monophasic early diastolic wave (D). Flow reversal during atrial systole (A) is common. There is agreement that the forward diastolic PV flow wave is caused by left ventricular relaxation with opening of the mitral valve. The origin of the PV systolic wave, however, remains a topic of debate. Some studies have suggested that the S wave is created by the relaxation of the left atrium and descent of the mitral valve plane. These studies have concluded that forces generated by the right ventricle (RV) have no effect on the S wave. Others suggest that the forward propagation of the right ventricular systolic pressure pulse is the major contributor to the S wave.

Objective

To determine whether any part of the systolic wave of PV flow is dependent on forces created by the right ventricle.

Materials and methods

We assessed PV flow pattern, as obtained by cardiac MRI in 12 cases (39 pulmonary veins) with RV-independent pulmonary circulation (bidirectional cavopulmonary connection or Fontan circulation). Phase-contrast imaging of the PVs was performed on a 1.5-T MR scanner with velocity encoding set at 120 cm/s. We compared these flow patterns with those of a control group of ten children (15 pulmonary veins) who had RV-dependent pulmonary circulation and underwent CMR for other indications.

Results

In all PVs of children with RV-independent pulmonary circulation the flow curves showed a single systolic peak in early systole (S1) with the S2 peak consistently absent. PV flow pattern in the control group consistently showed distinct early and late systolic peaks.

Conclusion

This study supports the concept that S2 is caused by forward propagation of the right ventricular systolic pressure pulse. It also demonstrates that the S1 is independent of the right ventricle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goo HW, Al-Otay A, Grosse-Wortmann L et al (2009) Phase-contrast magnetic resonance quantification of normal pulmonary venous return. J Magn Reson Imaging 29:588–594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kellenberger CJ, Macgowan CK, Roman KS et al (2005) Hemodynamic evaluation of the peripheral pulmonary circulation by cine-phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 22:780–787

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. de Marchi SF, Bodenmüller M, Lai DL et al (2001) Pulmonary venous flow patterns in 404 individuals without cardiovascular disease. Heart 85:23–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson RH, Baker EJ, Penny D et al (2010) Paediatric cardiology. Churchill Livingstone, Elsevier, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  5. Appleton CP (1997) Hemodynamic determinants of Doppler pulmonary venous flow velocity components: new insights from studies in lightly sedated normal dogs. J Am Coll Cardiol 30:1562–1574

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Smiseth OA, Thompson CR, Lohavanichbutr K et al (1999) The pulmonary venous systolic flow pulse—its origin and relationship to left atrial pressure. J Am Coll Cardiol 34:802–809

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Smallhorn JF, Freedom RM, Olley PM (1987) Pulsed Doppler echocardiographic assessment of extraparenchymal pulmonary vein flow. J Am Coll Cardiol 9:573–579

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Guntheroth WG, Gould R, Butler J et al (1974) Pulsative flow in pulmonary artery, capillary and vein in the dog. Cardiovasc Res 8:330–337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Morgan BC, Abel FL, Mullins GL et al (1966) Flow patterns in cavae, pulmonary artery, pulmonary vein and aorta in intact dogs. Am J Physiol 210:903–909

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rajagopalan B, Friend JA, Stallard T et al (1979) Blood flow in pulmonary veins: II. The influence of events transmitted from the right and left sides of the heart. Cardiovasc Res 13:677–683

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rajagopalan B, Bertram CD, Stallard T et al (1979) Blood flow in pulmonary veins: III. Simultaneous measurement of their dimensions, intravascular pressure and flow. Cardiovasc Res 13:684–692

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Keren G, Sherez J, Megidish R et al (1985) Pulmonary venous flow pattern—its relationship to cardiac dynamics. A pulsed Doppler echocardiographic study. Circulation 71:1105–1112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rydberg A, Teien DE, Karp K et al (1998) Pulmonary venous blood flow pattern in patients with univentricular hearts following total cavo-pulmonary connection. Clin Physiol 18:131–138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masoud Shariat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shariat, M., Grosse-Wortmann, L., Windram, J. et al. Pulmonary vein flow pattern in children with bidirectional cavopulmonary connection or Fontan circuit. Pediatr Radiol 42, 211–214 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-2227-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-2227-8

Keywords

Navigation